Agricultural soil greenhouse gas emissions: A review of National Inventory Methods

被引:88
|
作者
Lokupitiya, Erandathie [1 ]
Paustian, Keith [1 ]
机构
[1] Colorado State Univ, Dept Soil & Crop Sci & Nat Resource Ecol, Ft Collins, CO 80523 USA
关键词
ORGANIC-CARBON STORAGE; NEW-ZEALAND; LAND-USE; MANAGEMENT IMPACTS; TERRESTRIAL CARBON; NITROUS-OXIDE; FOREST SOILS; MODEL; ECOSYSTEMS; BUDGET;
D O I
10.2134/jeq2005.0157
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) are required to submit national greenhouse gas (GHG) inventories, together with information on methods used in estimating their emissions. Currently agricultural activities contribute a significant portion (approximately 20%) of global anthropogenic GHG emissions, and agricultural soils have been identified as one of the main GHG source categories within the agricultural sector. However, compared to many other GHG sources, inventory methods for soils are relatively more complex and have been implemented only to varying degrees among member countries. This review summarizes and evaluates the methods used by Annex 1 countries in estimating CO, and N2O emissions in agricultural soils. While most countries utilize the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) default methodology, several Annex 1 countries are developing more advanced methods that are tailored for specific country circumstances. Based on the latest national inventory reporting, about 56% of the Annex 1 countries use IPCC Tier I methods, about 26% use Tier 2 methods, and about 18% do not estirnate or report N2O emissions from agricultural soils. More than 65% of the countries do not report CO2 emissions from the cultivation of mineral soils, organic soils, or liming, and only a handful of countries have used country-specific, Tier 3 methods. Tier 3 methods usually involve process-based models and detailed, geographically specific activity data. Such methods can provide more robust, accurate estimates of emissions and removals but require greater diligence in documentation, transparency, and uncertainty assessment to ensure comparability between countries. Availability of detailed, spatially explicit activity data is a major constraint to implementing higher tiered methods in many countries.
引用
收藏
页码:1413 / 1427
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A Review of Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Agricultural Soil
    Basheer, Sana
    Wang, Xiuquan
    Farooque, Aitazaz A.
    Nawaz, Rana Ali
    Pang, Tianze
    Neokye, Emmanuel Okine
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2024, 16 (11)
  • [2] IMPACT OF AGRICULTURAL WASTE RETURN ON SOIL GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS
    Huang, D. D.
    Cao, G. J.
    Geng, Y. H.
    Wang, L. C.
    Chen, X. W.
    Liang, A. Z.
    APPLIED ECOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH, 2019, 17 (01): : 1321 - 1335
  • [3] A greenhouse gas emissions inventory for Pennsylvania
    Rose, A
    Neff, R
    Yarnal, B
    Greenberg, H
    JOURNAL OF THE AIR & WASTE MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION, 2005, 55 (08) : 1122 - 1133
  • [4] Review of Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Rewetted Agricultural Soils
    Bianchi, Andrea
    Larmola, Tuula
    Kekkonen, Hanna
    Saarnio, Sanna
    Lang, Kristiina
    WETLANDS, 2021, 41 (08)
  • [5] Review of Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Rewetted Agricultural Soils
    Andrea Bianchi
    Tuula Larmola
    Hanna Kekkonen
    Sanna Saarnio
    Kristiina Lång
    Wetlands, 2021, 41
  • [7] Peat-based emissions in Finland's national greenhouse gas inventory
    Lapvetelainen, Tuija
    Regina, Kristiina
    Perala, Paula
    BOREAL ENVIRONMENT RESEARCH, 2007, 12 (02): : 225 - 236
  • [8] The reduction of agricultural greenhouse gas emissions
    Hediger, Werner
    Peter, Simon
    Hartmann, Michael
    Weber, Michael
    Lehmann, Bernard
    AGRARFORSCHUNG, 2009, 16 (09): : 354 - 359
  • [9] INVENTORY OF GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS IN THE NETHERLANDS
    SWART, RJ
    BOUWMAN, L
    OLIVIER, J
    VANDENBORN, GJ
    AMBIO, 1993, 22 (08) : 518 - 523
  • [10] Carbon dynamics in agricultural greenhouse gas emissions and removals: a comprehensive review
    Kamyab, Hesam
    Saberikamarposhti, Morteza
    Hashim, Haslenda
    Yusuf, Mohammad
    CARBON LETTERS, 2024, 34 (01) : 265 - 289