Multiple-Objective Genetic Algorithm Using the Multiple Criteria Decision Making Method TOPSIS

被引:0
|
作者
Mendez, Maximo [1 ]
Galvan, Blas [1 ]
Salazar, Daniel [1 ]
Greiner, David [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Las Palmas Gran Canaria, Dept Comp Sci, Edif Informat & Matemat,Campus Tafira, Las Palmas Gran Canaria 35017, Spain
关键词
Multi-objective evolutionary algorithm; 0-1 Multi-objective knapsack problem (0-1MOKP); Multiple criteria decision making; Preferences; Safety systems design optimisation; TOPSIS;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
C93 [管理学]; O22 [运筹学];
学科分类号
070105 ; 12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
The so called second generation of Multi-Objective Evolutionary Algorithms (MOEAs) like NSGA-II, are highly efficient and obtain Pareto optimal fronts characterized mainly by a wider spread and visually distributed fronts. The subjacent idea is to provide the decision-makers (DM) with the most representative set of alternatives in terms of objective values, reserving the articulation of preferences to an a posteriori stage. Nevertheless, in many real discrete problems the number of solutions that belong the Pareto front is unknown and if the specified size of the non-dominated population in the MOEA is less than the number of solutions of the problem, the found front will be incomplete for a posteriori Making Decision. A possible strategy to overcome this difficulty is to promote those solutions placed in the region of interest while neglecting the others during the search, according to some DM's preferences. We propose TOPSISGA, that merges the second generation of MOEAs (we use NSGA-II) with the well known multiple criteria decision making technique TOPSIS whose main principle is to identify as preferred solutions those ones with the shortest distance to the positive ideal solution and the longest distance from the negative ideal solution. The method induces an ordered list of alternatives in accordance to the DM's preferences based on Similarity to the ideal point.
引用
收藏
页码:145 / +
页数:2
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Behavior coordination using multiple-objective decision making
    Pirjanian, P
    Christensen, HI
    SENSOR FUSION AND DECENTRALIZED CONTROL IN AUTONOMOUS ROBOTIC SYSTEMS, 1997, 3209 : 78 - 89
  • [2] A NEW APPROACH FOR MULTIPLE-OBJECTIVE DECISION-MAKING
    HWANG, CL
    LAI, YJ
    LIU, TY
    COMPUTERS & OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 1993, 20 (08) : 889 - 899
  • [3] Maximum entropy method for solving bilevel multiple-objective decision making problem
    Liu, Shancun
    Qiu, Wanhua
    Wei, Cunping
    Xitong Gongcheng Lilun yu Shijian/System Engineering Theory and Practice, 2000, 20 (03): : 99 - 103
  • [4] Multiple-objective optimization decision-making method for large scale systems
    Qian, FC
    Li, Q
    Liu, D
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 4TH WORLD CONGRESS ON INTELLIGENT CONTROL AND AUTOMATION, VOLS 1-4, 2002, : 936 - 939
  • [5] A Cloud TOPSIS Method for Multiple Criteria Decision Making with Interval Number
    Wang, Tie-Dan
    Peng, Ding-Hong
    Shao, Xiao-Shi
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON WIRELESS COMMUNICATION AND SENSOR NETWORKS (WCSN 2016), 2016, 44 : 389 - 394
  • [6] A COMPARISON OF INTERACTIVE MULTIPLE-OBJECTIVE DECISION-MAKING PROCEDURES
    GIBSON, M
    BERNARDO, JJ
    CHUNG, C
    BADINELLI, R
    COMPUTERS & OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 1987, 14 (02) : 97 - 105
  • [7] Decision Making with Prostate Cancer: A Multiple-Objective Model with Uncertainty
    Simon, Jay
    INTERFACES, 2009, 39 (03) : 218 - 227
  • [8] Multiple-objective optimization of drinking water production strategies using a genetic algorithm
    Vink, K
    Schot, P
    WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2002, 38 (09) : 20 - 1
  • [9] Investigation of Metacognitive Awareness in Learning Programming Course Using Multiple Criteria Decision Making Algorithm: TOPSIS
    Hota, C. P. Pavan Kumar
    Asanambigai, V.
    Lakshmi, D.
    JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL NEGATIVE RESULTS, 2022, 13 : 1007 - 1016
  • [10] Decision Making with Prostate Cancer: A Multiple-Objective Model with Uncertainty Comment
    Neville, Tom
    INTERFACES, 2009, 39 (03) : 227 - 227