The Concerns During Assisted Reproductive Technologies (CART) scale and pregnancy outcomes

被引:62
|
作者
Klonoff-Cohen, H [1 ]
Natarajan, L [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Diego, Dept Family & Prevent Med, La Jolla, CA 92093 USA
关键词
assisted reproductive technologies; concerns; in vitro fertilization; pregnancy; live births;
D O I
10.1016/j.fertnstert.2003.08.050
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To determine whether concerns specific to IVF/GIFT (i.e., side effects, surgery, anesthesia, not enough information, pain, recovery, finances, missing work, and live birth delivery) that were measured by the previously validated Concerns During Assisted Reproductive Technologies (CART) instrument are negatively associated with reproductive endpoints. Design: Prospective study. Setting: Seven centers in Southern California between July 1993 and June 1998. Patient(s): One hundred fifty-one women completed two questionnaires at baseline and at the time of the procedure. Intervention(s): None. Main Outcome Measure(s): Number of oocytes aspirated and fertilized, number of embryos transferred, pregnancy rates, and live birth delivery rates. Result(s): At baseline, women who were concerned about the medical aspects (i.e., side effects, surgery, anesthesia, not enough information, pain, and recovery) of the procedure had 20% fewer oocytes retrieved and 19% fewer oocytes fertilized, while simultaneously adjusting for female age, race, education, smoking status, parity, type of assisted reproductive technologies (ART) procedure (IVF or GIFT), type of infertility, and number of previous attempts. Women who were very concerned about missing work had 30% fewer ooyctes fertilized. For women who were moderately concerned about missing work, the odds ratio was 2.83 for not achieving a pregnancy. Women who were extremely concerned about the finances associated with the procedure had a very high risk (odds ratio [OR] = 11.62) of not achieving a successful live birth delivery. Conclusion(s): The CART scale identified two areas of concerns for women undergoing IVF or GIFT: "missing work/finances" and "medical aspects of the procedure." (C) 2004 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.
引用
收藏
页码:982 / 988
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Validation of a new scale for measuring concerns of women undergoing assisted reproductive technologies (CART)
    Klonoff-Cohen, Hillary
    Natarajan, Loki
    Klonoff, Elizabeth
    JOURNAL OF HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, 2007, 12 (02) : 352 - 356
  • [2] Implications of Assisted Reproductive Technologies for Pregnancy Outcomes in Mammals
    Hansen, Peter J.
    ANNUAL REVIEW OF ANIMAL BIOSCIENCES, VOL 8, 2020, 2020, 8 : 395 - 413
  • [3] Does the ultrasound appearance of the endometrium during treatment with assisted reproductive technologies influence pregnancy outcomes?
    Oluborode, Babawale
    Burks, Heather
    Craig, LaTasha B.
    Peck, Jennifer D.
    HUMAN FERTILITY, 2022, 25 (01) : 166 - 175
  • [4] Metabolomics for improving pregnancy outcomes in women undergoing assisted reproductive technologies
    Siristatidis, Charalampos S.
    Sertedaki, Eleni
    Vaidakis, Dennis
    COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2017, (05):
  • [5] Pregnancy outcomes after kidney transplant utilizing assisted reproductive technologies
    Shah, Silvi
    Rachwal, Brenna
    Vyas, Prema
    Basera, Pragati
    Rao, Swathi
    Leonard, Anthony
    Verma, Prasoon
    Constantinescu, Serban
    Moritz, Michael
    Jesudason, Shilpanjali
    Coscia, Lisa
    TRANSPLANTATION, 2024, 108 (09) : 68 - 68
  • [6] Metabolomics for improving pregnancy outcomes in women undergoing assisted reproductive technologies
    Siristatidis, Charalampos S.
    Sertedaki, Eleni
    Vaidakis, Dennis
    Varounis, Christos
    Trivella, Marialena
    COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2018, (03):
  • [7] Epidemiology of critical states during pregnancy after assisted reproductive technologies
    Bashmakova, N. V.
    Davydenko, N. B.
    Malgina, G. B.
    Putilova, N. V.
    GYNECOLOGICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2016, 32 : 47 - 51
  • [8] Pregnancy outcomes after kidney transplant utilizing assisted reproductive technologies.
    Shah, Silvi
    Rachwal, Brenna
    Vyas, Prema
    Basera, Pragati
    Rao, Swathi
    Leonard, Anthony
    Verma, Prasoon
    Constantinescu, Serban
    Moritz, Michael
    Jesudason, Shilpanjali
    Coscia, Lisa
    TRANSPLANTATION, 2024, 108 (9S)
  • [9] Assisted reproductive technologies and pregnancy outcomes: Mechanistic insights from animal studies
    Sinclair, Kevin D.
    SEMINARS IN REPRODUCTIVE MEDICINE, 2008, 26 (02) : 153 - 161
  • [10] Corpus luteal contribution to maternal pregnancy physiology and outcomes in assisted reproductive technologies\
    Conrad, Kirk P.
    Baker, Valerie L.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-REGULATORY INTEGRATIVE AND COMPARATIVE PHYSIOLOGY, 2013, 304 (02) : R69 - R72