Current Methods of Tissue Extraction in Minimally Invasive Surgical Treatment of Uterine Fibroids

被引:4
|
作者
Kim, Renita [1 ,6 ]
Pepin, Kristen [2 ]
Dmello, Monalisa [3 ]
Clark, Nisse [4 ]
Ajao, Mobolaji [3 ]
Einarsson, Jon [3 ]
Rassier, Sarah Cohen [5 ]
机构
[1] Mt Sinai Hosp, Dept Obstet Gynecol & Reprod Sci, New York, NY USA
[2] New York Presbyterian Weill Cornell Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, New York, NY USA
[3] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Boston, MA USA
[4] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Boston, MA USA
[5] Mayo Clin, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Rochester, MN USA
[6] Mt Sinai Hosp, Dept Obstet Gynecol & Reprod Sci, 1176 5th Ave, New York, NY 10029 USA
关键词
Leiomyoma; Morcellation; Survey; Tissue extraction; MORCELLATION; HYSTERECTOMY; IMPACT;
D O I
10.4293/JSLS.2022.00036
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and Objectives: Since the 2014 Food and Drug Administration communication regarding the use of power morcellation, gynecologists have adopted alterna-tive tissue extraction strategies. The objective of this study is to investigate the current techniques used by gyneco-logic surgeons for tissue extraction following minimally invasive hysterectomy or myomectomy for fibroids.Methods: An online survey was distributed to all AAGL members and responses were collected between March 26, 2019 and April 17, 2019.Results: Four hundred thirty-six respondents completed the survey. For hysterectomy, the most common methods of tissue extraction were manual morcellation through the colpotomy (72.4%) or minilaparotomy (66.9%). Nearly one-third (31.7%) endorsed using power morcellation. For myo-mectomy, manual morcellation via minilaparotomy (71.9%) was the most common approach, followed by power morcellation (35.7%). Use of containment bags was com-mon. Minilaparotomy incisions were typically three cm and most often at the umbilicus.Geographic differences were detected, particularly with power morcellation. During hysterectomy, 18.4% of US-based surgeons reported its use, compared to 56.9% of nonUS-based surgeons. During myomectomy, 20.5% of US-based surgeons reported its use compared to 67.5% of their international counterparts. Age, years in practice, fellowship training, and practice location were all significantly associated with power morcellator use.Conclusion: A large majority of practitioners are perform-ing manual morcellation through the colpotomy or minila-parotomy. Use of containment bags is common with all routes of tissue removal. Power morcellation use is less common in the United States than in other countries.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Minimally Invasive Surgery for Uterine Fibroids with Contained Tissue Extraction
    Brown, Douglas N.
    Lum, Deirdre
    CURRENT WOMENS HEALTH REVIEWS, 2018, 14 (01) : 42 - 47
  • [2] Uterine artery embolization: A minimally invasive technique for the treatment of uterine fibroids
    Wong, GCH
    Muir, SJ
    Lai, APW
    Goodwin, SC
    JOURNAL OF WOMENS HEALTH & GENDER-BASED MEDICINE, 2000, 9 (04): : 357 - 362
  • [3] Minimally invasive surgery for uterine fibroids
    Wang, Yuehan
    Zhang, Shitai
    Li, Chenyang
    Li, Bo
    Ouyang, Ling
    GINEKOLOGIA POLSKA, 2020, 91 (03) : 149 - 157
  • [4] Minimally invasive management of uterine fibroids
    Falcone, T
    Bedaiwy, MA
    CURRENT OPINION IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2002, 14 (04) : 401 - 407
  • [5] Minimally invasive surgical techniques versus open myomectomy for uterine fibroids
    Chittawar, Priya Bhave
    Franik, Sebastian
    Pouwer, Annefloor W.
    Farquhar, Cindy
    COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2014, (10):
  • [6] Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques for Tissue Extraction
    Haber, Hilary R.
    Namazi, Golnaz
    Pepin, Kristen
    Einarsson, Jon I.
    JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 2021, 28 (03) : 388 - 388
  • [7] The impact of body mass index on surgical complications in minimally invasive hysterectomy for uterine fibroids
    Axelrod, Michal
    Hamilton, Kacey M.
    Schneyer, Rebecca J.
    Levin, Gabriel
    Weiss, Yotam
    Siedhoff, Matthew T.
    Wright, Kelly N.
    Meyer, Raanan
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2025, 305 : 387 - 393
  • [8] Minimally invasive treatment options for uterine fibroids-state-of-the art 2021
    Krzyzanowski, Jaroslaw
    Wozniak, Slawomir
    Szkodziak, Piotr
    Krzyzanowski, Arkadiusz
    Wojciech, Wrona
    Paszkowski, Tomasz
    GINEKOLOGIA POLSKA, 2022, 93 (03) : 242 - 247
  • [9] Review of nonsurgical/minimally invasive treatments for uterine fibroids
    van der Kooij, Sanne M.
    Ankum, Willem M.
    Hehenkamp, Wouter J. K.
    CURRENT OPINION IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2012, 24 (06) : 368 - 375
  • [10] Minimally Invasive Approaches to the Surgical Management of Fibroids
    Wu, Harold Y.
    Wang, Karen C.
    SEMINARS IN REPRODUCTIVE MEDICINE, 2017, 35 (06) : 533 - 548