When decarbonization meets development: The sectoral feasibility of greenhouse gas mitigation in India

被引:29
|
作者
Busby, Joshua W. [1 ]
Shidore, Sarang [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Austin, Sch Publ Affairs, Austin, TX 78712 USA
关键词
Climate change; Sectoral; India; Mitigation; Political feasibility; RENEWABLE ENERGY; SOCIAL-SCIENCE; POLITICS; POWER;
D O I
10.1016/j.erss.2016.11.011
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
In the run-up to the 2015 Paris climate talks, the Indian government announced ambitious climate mitigation goals as part of its INDC (Intended Nationally Determined Contributions). Whether India can meet these targets is a critical question with implications for the success of the Paris climate agreement. We assess India's potential for emissions mitigation through a sectoral lens, focusing on eight dominant sectors - namely electricity production, agriculture, road transport, buildings, and four disaggregated industry subsectors (steel, cement, petrochemicals, and fertilizers). We argue that whether emissions mitigation is favorable from a structural perspective is a function of two main factors: (1) political/organizational feasibility and (2) techno-economic feasibility. Political/organizational feasibility in turn is assessed through two additional factors, market concentration and government concentration. Our central intuition is that fragmented markets and/or fragmented government structures pose barriers for collective action. Road transport represents the most favorable sector for emissions mitigation followed by petrochemicals. Cement and fertilizers are already at or near the global efficiency frontier. Three sectors - electricity, agriculture, and steel - represent hard cases on both dimensions of feasibility. Buildings possess strong techno-economic feasibility but challenging political/organizational feasibility. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:60 / 73
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Regional and sectoral assessment of greenhouse gas emissions in India
    Garg, A
    Bhattacharya, S
    Shukla, PR
    Dadhwal, WK
    ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2001, 35 (15) : 2679 - 2695
  • [2] The modelling of policy options for greenhouse gas mitigation in India
    Shukla, PR
    AMBIO, 1996, 25 (04) : 240 - 248
  • [3] On the potential for alternative greenhouse gas equivalence metrics to influence sectoral mitigation patterns
    Brennan, Mark E.
    Zaitchik, Benjamin F.
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2013, 8 (01):
  • [4] Lessons learnt from a sectoral analysis of greenhouse gas mitigation potential in the Balkans
    Georgopoulou, E.
    Mirasgedis, S.
    Sarafidis, Y.
    Gakis, N.
    Hontou, V.
    Lalas, D. P.
    Steiner, D.
    Tuerk, A.
    Fruhmann, C.
    Pucker, J.
    ENERGY, 2015, 92 : 577 - 591
  • [5] When national defence meets decarbonization: Arming India's just transition with military assistance
    Sravan, Ch.
    Mishra, Prajna Paramita
    ENERGY RESEARCH & SOCIAL SCIENCE, 2023, 98
  • [6] Sectoral greenhouse gas emission mitigation possibilities. Why broad spectrum of indicators is applied
    Pubule, Jelena
    Gancone, Agita
    Rosa, Marika
    Blumberga, Dagnija
    INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE - ENVIRONMENTAL AND CLIMATE TECHNOLOGIES, CONECT 2016, 2017, 113 : 377 - 381
  • [7] Gendered impacts of greenhouse gas mitigation options for rice cultivation in India
    Gartaula, Hom
    Sapkota, Tek
    Khatri-Chhetri, Arun
    Prasad, Gokul
    Badstue, Lone
    CLIMATIC CHANGE, 2020, 163 (02) : 1045 - 1063
  • [8] Gendered impacts of greenhouse gas mitigation options for rice cultivation in India
    Hom Gartaula
    Tek B Sapkota
    Arun Khatri-Chhetri
    Gokul Prasad
    Lone Badstue
    Climatic Change, 2020, 163 : 1045 - 1063
  • [9] Integrated Energy Planning and Greenhouse Gas Mitigation - India Case Study
    Kumar, John Arun
    Radhakrishna, C.
    TENCON 2009 - 2009 IEEE REGION 10 CONFERENCE, VOLS 1-4, 2009, : 2154 - +
  • [10] Modeling the greenhouse gas budget of straw returning in China Feasibility of mitigation and countermeasures
    Lu, Fei
    Wang, Xiao-Ke
    Han, Bing
    Ouyang, Zhi-Yun
    Zheng, Hua
    ECOLOGICAL COMPLEXITY AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2010, 1195 (S1): : E107 - E130