A randomized controlled clinical trial of glass carbomer restorations in Class II cavities in primary molars: 12-month results

被引:9
|
作者
EI-Housseiny, Azza A. [1 ,2 ]
Alamoudi, Najlaa M. [1 ]
Nouri, Sumaya [1 ]
Felemban, Osama [1 ]
机构
[1] King Abdulaziz Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Pediat Dent, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
[2] Alexandria Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Pediat Dent, Alexandria, Egypt
来源
QUINTESSENCE INTERNATIONAL | 2019年 / 50卷 / 07期
关键词
composite; Class II; glass carbomer; glass-ionomer cement; primary molars; PRIMARY TEETH; IONOMER CEMENTS; HYDROXYAPATITE; STRENGTH; HEALTH; CARIES;
D O I
10.3290/j.qi.a42573
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objective: To evaluate the clinical performance of Glass Carbomer (GC) (GCP Dental) in restoring Class II cavities in primary molars in comparison with resin-modified glass-ionomer cement (RMGIC) and composite resin (CR) restorations. Method and materials: Healthy children aged between 4 and 8 years with a proximal lesion in at least one primary molar were recruited from the Pediatric Dental Clinics. A sample of 162 molars was randomly assigned to one of the following restoration types: GC, RMGIC, and CR. The restorations were evaluated clinically using the Cvar and Ryge criteria at 6 and 12 months postoperatively. Results: At 12 months, the success rates of anatomical form and marginal adaptation were 67% and 54% for GC, 98% and 93% for RMGIC, and 98% and 98% for CR, respectively. The GC restorations were significantly less successful than RMGIC and CR restorations in terms of anatomical form (P<.001) and marginal adaptation (P<.001). Secondary caries formation was not observed in any of the restorations in the three restorative material groups. Conclusion: The 12-month clinical performance of the GC restorative material was not satisfactory in restoring Class II cavities in primary molars. RMGIC and composite resin restorations performed significantly better. The use of GC cannot be recommended for restoring Class II cavities in primary molars.
引用
收藏
页码:522 / 532
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Clinical Performance of Class II Adhesive Restorations in Pulpectomized Primary Molars: 12-month Results
    Zulfikaroglu, Burcu Togay
    Atac, Atila Stephan
    Cehreli, Zafer C.
    JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY FOR CHILDREN, 2008, 75 (01): : 33 - 43
  • [2] Comparison of Conventional versus Colored Compomers for Class II Restorations in Primary Molars: A 12-Month Clinical Study
    Ertugrul, Fahinur
    Cogulu, Dilsah
    Ozdemir, Yasemin
    Ersin, Nazan
    MEDICAL PRINCIPLES AND PRACTICE, 2010, 19 (02) : 148 - 152
  • [3] BiodentineTM versus formocresol pulpotomy technique in primary molars: a 12-month randomized controlled clinical trial
    El Meligy, Omar Abd El Sadek
    Alamoudi, Najlaa Mohamed
    Allazzam, Sulaiman Mohamed
    El-Housseiny, Azza Abdel Mohsen
    BMC ORAL HEALTH, 2019, 19 (1)
  • [4] Randomized clinical trial of adhesive restorations in primary molars. 18-month results
    Casagrande, Luciano
    Dalpian, Debora Martini
    Ardenghi, Thiago Machado
    Zanatta, Fabricio Batistin
    Agostini Balbinot, Carlos Eduardo
    Garcia-Godoy, Franklin
    de Araujo, Fernando Borba
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2013, 26 (06): : 351 - 355
  • [5] A randomized trial of resin-based restorations in Class I and Class II beveled preparations in primary molars 24-month results
    Alves dos Santos, Marcia Pereira
    Passos, Mariana
    Luiz, Ronir Raggio
    Maia, Lucianne Cople
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION, 2009, 140 (02): : 156 - 166
  • [6] Ketac Molar versus Dyract class II restorations in primary molars: Twelve month clinical results
    Marks, LAM
    van Amerongen, WE
    Borgmeijer, PJ
    Groen, HJ
    Martens, LC
    JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY FOR CHILDREN, 2000, 67 (01) : 37 - 41
  • [7] Anterior implant restorations with a convex emergence profile increase the frequency of recession: 12-month results of a randomized controlled clinical trial
    Siegenthaler, Marina
    Strauss, Franz J.
    Gamper, Felix
    Hammerle, Christoph H. F.
    Jung, Ronald E.
    Thoma, Daniel S.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY, 2022, 49 (11) : 1145 - 1157
  • [8] Glass carbomer and compomer for ART restorations: 3-year results of a randomized clinical trial
    Isabel Cristina Olegário
    Daniela Hesse
    Fausto Medeiros Mendes
    Clarissa Calil Bonifácio
    Daniela Prócida Raggio
    Clinical Oral Investigations, 2019, 23 : 1761 - 1770
  • [9] Six -year results of a randomized controlled clinical trial of two glass ionomer cements in class II cavities
    Heck, Katrin
    Frasheri, Iris
    Diegritz, Christian
    Manhart, Juergen
    Hickel, Reinhard
    Fotiadou, Christina
    JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2020, 97
  • [10] Glass carbomer and compomer for ART restorations: 3-year results of a randomized clinical trial
    Olegario, Isabel Cristina
    Hesse, Daniela
    Mendes, Fausto Medeiros
    Bonifacio, Clarissa Calil
    Raggio, Daniela Procida
    CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2019, 23 (04) : 1761 - 1770