Emission trading and carbon market performance in Shenzhen, China

被引:157
|
作者
Ren, Cong [1 ]
Lo, Alex Y. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hong Kong, Dept Geog, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Hong Kong, HKU Shenzhen Inst Res & Innovat, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Emission trading; Carbon market; Allowance price; Climate change; GARCH model; China; TIME-SERIES; STOCK RETURNS; UNIT-ROOT; VOLATILITY; PRICES; CHALLENGES; LESSONS; PILOTS; MODEL; SPOT;
D O I
10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.02.037
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
China has developed its own domestic carbon markets by setting up emission trading schemes. This study addresses concerns about the functioning of these schemes and the financial performance of the Chinese carbon market. It aims to assess an actual outcome of this policy intervention, i.e. trading records, which were used in our analysis to examine a key financial property of the allowance-based market in Shenzhen. In a mature market, assets that incur higher risks are likely to yield higher returns, i.e. a positive relationship. To examine this property, we solicited historical data on the price and trading volume of emission allowances. We statistically estimated the degree of volatility in the Shenzhen market and its relationship with expected return premium. We found that the rate of return was negatively associated with expected risk. This stands at odds with the usual expectation in the financial market and the prediction of asset pricing theory. Also, kurtosis in trading volume was excessively high and its fluctuations were highly concentrated. We discuss these findings in terms of market liquidity and information uncertainties, and offer some policy recommendations. More regulatory attention and economic fixes are needed to improve market efficiency and eliminate sources of market distortions. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:414 / 425
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Research on China's carbon emission trading market
    Yin, Yingkai
    Zhou, Lei
    Chen, Yanzhou
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2017 3RD INTERNATIONAL FORUM ON ENERGY, ENVIRONMENT SCIENCE AND MATERIALS (IFEESM 2017), 2017, 120 : 1429 - 1433
  • [2] A CRITICAL STUDY OF CARBON EMISSION TRADING MARKET IN CHINA
    Wang, Qiushuang
    Zheng, Xiaosong
    6TH INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE BUSINESS AND MANAGEMENT 2010, VOLS I AND II, 2010, : 752 - 759
  • [3] Innovative Carbon Allowance Allocation Policy for the Shenzhen Emission Trading Scheme in China
    Ye, Bin
    Jiang, Jingjing
    Miao, Lixin
    Li, Ji
    Peng, Yang
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2016, 8 (01):
  • [4] Research on the Construction of China's Carbon Emission Trading Market
    Shi, Changfeng
    Zhang, Yangyang
    2017 2ND PMSS INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON TEACHING RESEARCH AND SOCIAL SCIENCE (PMSS-TRSS 2017), 2017, 102 : 31 - 35
  • [5] The construction of Shenzhen's carbon emission trading scheme
    Jiang, Jing Jing
    Ye, Bin
    Ma, Xiao Ming
    ENERGY POLICY, 2014, 75 : 17 - 21
  • [6] Do the performance and efficiency of China's carbon emission trading market change over time?
    Zhang, Shiyi
    Jiang, Kai
    Wang, Lan
    Bongers, Geoff
    Hu, Guoping
    Li, Jia
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2020, 27 (26) : 33140 - 33160
  • [7] Do the performance and efficiency of China’s carbon emission trading market change over time?
    Shiyi Zhang
    Kai Jiang
    Lan Wang
    Geoff Bongers
    Guoping Hu
    Jia Li
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2020, 27 : 33140 - 33160
  • [8] Carbon Emission Trading Market in China: Operation Mechanism and Development Path
    Feng, Tiantian
    Gong, Xiaolei
    Yang, Yisheng
    EKOLOJI, 2019, 28 (107): : 3417 - 3427
  • [9] Fragmented or Unified? The State of China's Carbon Emission Trading Market
    Wu, Liangzheng
    Huang, Yan
    Gu, Yimiao
    ENERGIES, 2023, 16 (05)
  • [10] Global Carbon Emission Trading Market and China's Sustainable Development
    Chen Jian
    Li Maoguan
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2017 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EDUCATION, ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT RESEARCH (ICEEMR 2017), 2017, 95 : 438 - 442