The dark side of open access in Google and Google Scholar: the case of Latin-American repositories

被引:21
作者
Orduna-Malea, Enrique [1 ]
Delgado Lopez-Cozar, Emilio [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Politecn Valencia, Res Grp EC3, Valencia 46022, Spain
[2] Univ Granada, Res Grp EC3, E-18071 Granada, Spain
关键词
Open access; Repositories; Google; Google Scholar; Webometrics; Web indicators; Web visibility; Indexing; Latin America; INSTITUTIONAL REPOSITORIES; LIBRARIES; RESEARCHERS; IMPACT; MEDIA;
D O I
10.1007/s11192-014-1369-5
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Since repositories are a key tool in making scholarly knowledge open access (OA), determining their web presence and visibility on the Web (both are proxies of web impact) is essential, particularly in Google (search engine par excellence) and Google Scholar (a tool increasingly used by researchers to search for academic information). The few studies conducted so far have been limited to very specific geographic areas (USA), which makes it necessary to find out what is happening in other regions that are not part of mainstream academia, and where repositories play a decisive role in the visibility of scholarly production. The main objective of this study is to ascertain the web presence and visibility of Latin American repositories in Google and Google Scholar through the application of page count and web mention indicators respectively. For a sample of 137 repositories, the results indicate that the indexing ratio is low in Google, and virtually nonexistent in Google Scholar; they also indicate a complete lack of correspondence between the repository records and the data produced by these two search tools. These results are mainly attributable to limitations arising from the use of description schemas that are incompatible with Google Scholar (repository design) and the reliability of web mention indicators (search engines). We conclude that neither Google nor Google Scholar accurately represent the actual size of OA content published by Latin American repositories; this may indicate a non-indexed, hidden side to OA, which could be limiting the dissemination and consumption of OA scholarly literature.
引用
收藏
页码:829 / 846
页数:18
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]  
Aguillo I.F., 2011, WORKSH NEW RES LIN I
[2]  
Aguillo I. F., 2006, Revista de Universidad y Sociedad del Conocimiento (RUSC), V3, P68
[3]   Measuring the institution's footprint in the web [J].
Aguillo, Isidro .
LIBRARY HI TECH, 2009, 27 (04) :540-556
[4]   Indicators for a webometric ranking of open access repositories [J].
Aguillo, Isidro F. ;
Ortega, Jose L. ;
Fernandez, Mario ;
Utrilla, Ana M. .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 2010, 82 (03) :477-486
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2003, ARL BIMONTHLY REPORT
[6]  
[Anonymous], P 8 INT C WEB INF SC
[7]  
[Anonymous], PLOS ONE
[8]  
Archambault E., 2013, TECHNICAL REPORT
[9]  
Arlitsch K, 2013, J LIBR ADM, V53, P177
[10]   Invisible institutional repositories: addressing the low indexing ratios of IRs in Google [J].
Arlitsch, Kenning ;
O'Brien, Patrick S. .
LIBRARY HI TECH, 2012, 30 (01) :60-81