The right to health as the basis for universal health coverage: A cross-national analysis of national medicines policies of 71 countries

被引:20
|
作者
Perehudoff, S. Katrina [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Alexandrov, Nikita V. [1 ]
Hogerzeil, Hans V. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Hlth Sci, Global Hlth Unit, Groningen, Netherlands
[2] Univ Toronto, Dalla Lana Sch Publ Hlth, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Univ Ghent, Int Ctr Reprod Hlth, Dept Publ Hlth & Primary Care, Ghent, Belgium
来源
PLOS ONE | 2019年 / 14卷 / 06期
关键词
DRUG POLICIES; ACCESS;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0215577
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Persistent barriers to universal access to medicines are limited social protection in the event of illness, inadequate financing for essential medicines, frequent stock-outs in the public sector, and high prices in the private sector. We argue that greater coherence between human rights law, national medicines policies, and universal health coverage schemes can address these barriers. We present a cross-national content analysis of national medicines policies from 71 countries published between 1990-2016. The World Health Organization's ( WHO) 2001 guidelines for developing and implementing a national medicines policy and all 71 national medicines policies were assessed on 12 principles, linking a health systems approach to essential medicines with international human rights law for medicines affordability and financing for vulnerable groups. National medicines policies most frequently contain measures for medicines selection and efficient spending/cost-effectiveness. Four principles ( legal right to health; government financing; efficient spending; and financial protection of vulnerable populations) are significantly stronger in national medicines policies published after 2004 than before. Six principles have remained weak or absent: pooling user contributions, international cooperation, and four principles for good governance. Overall, South Africa ( 1996), Indonesia and South Sudan ( 2006), Philippines ( 2011-2016), Malaysia ( 2012), Somalia ( 2013), Afghanistan ( 2014), and Uganda ( 2015) include the most relevant texts and can be used as models for other settings. We conclude that WHO's 2001 guidelines have guided the content and language of many subsequent national medicines policies. WHO and national policy makers can use these principles and the practical examples identified in our study to further align national medicines policies with human rights law and with Target 3.8 for universal access to essential medicines in the Sustainable Development Goals.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Universal access to essential medicines as part of the right to health: a cross-national comparison of national laws, medicines policies, and health system indicators
    Perehudoff, Katrina
    GLOBAL HEALTH ACTION, 2020, 13 (01)
  • [2] Effects of Governance on Health: a Cross-National Analysis of 101 Countries
    Klomp, Jeroen
    de Haan, Jakob
    KYKLOS, 2008, 61 (04) : 599 - 614
  • [3] Cross-national analysis of a model of reproductive health in developing countries
    Pillai, VK
    Gupta, R
    SOCIAL SCIENCE RESEARCH, 2006, 35 (01) : 210 - 227
  • [4] NATIONAL DETERMINANTS OF HEALTH: A CROSS-NATIONAL AGGREGATE ANALYSIS
    Schultz, David
    MEDICINE LAW & SOCIETY, 2022, 15 (02): : 241 - 252
  • [5] Public financing of health in developing countries: a cross-national systematic analysis
    Lu, Chunling
    Schneider, Matthew T.
    Gubbins, Paul
    Leach-Kemon, Katherine
    Jamison, Dean
    Murray, Christopher J. L.
    LANCET, 2010, 375 (9723): : 1375 - 1387
  • [6] Oral health and welfare state regimes: a cross-national analysis of European countries
    Guarnizo-Herreno, Carol C.
    Tsakos, Georgios
    Sheiham, Aubrey
    Watt, Richard G.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORAL SCIENCES, 2013, 121 (03) : 169 - 175
  • [7] Impact of Universal Health Insurance Coverage on Hypertension Management: A Cross-National Study in the United States and England
    Dalton, Andrew R. H.
    Vamos, Eszter P.
    Harris, Matthew J.
    Netuveli, Gopalakrishnan
    Wachter, Robert M.
    Majeed, Azeem
    Millett, Christopher
    PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (01):
  • [8] New technologies and adolescents' health: A cross-national study in 35 countries
    Lenciauskiene, I.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2007, 17 : 173 - 173
  • [9] The Policies of Social Innovation: A Cross-National Analysis
    Krlev, Gorgi
    Einarsson, Torbjorn
    Wijkstrom, Filip
    Heyer, Lea
    Mildenberger, Georg
    NONPROFIT AND VOLUNTARY SECTOR QUARTERLY, 2020, 49 (03) : 457 - 478
  • [10] Identifying effects of health and long-term care policies through cross-national analysis
    Boersch-Supan, Axel
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF AGEING, 2012, 9 (01) : 65 - 68