Septal fractures predict poor outcomes after closed nasal reduction: Retrospective review and survey

Objectives/Hypothesis To determine outcomes of patients with displaced nasal bone fractures after closed nasal reduction (CNR). Study Design Retrospective patient review. Methods Review of all patients presenting to the emergency department of a tertiary-care, level 1 trauma hospital with a nasal bone fracture over a 2-year period, followed by telephone survey after CNR. Results Six hundred seven patients presented to the emergency department in 2015 and 2016 with a diagnosis of nasal bone fracture. Of these, 134 patients met inclusion criteria and underwent CNR without septal reduction. Those with sports-related injuries and those with a septal fracture identified on computed tomography imaging were significantly more likely to undergo CNR. Ninety-one patients completed the post-CNR telephone survey. Over 90% of patients were satisfied with the procedure. However, patients with septal fractures reported worse outcomes, as 53.6% versus 24.1% (P = .0025) disagreed that CNR improved nasal breathing. Of all patients, 11 (2%) eventually underwent septorhinoplasty, with the presence of septal fracture on imaging a significant risk factor. Conclusions Nasal bone fractures are a common injury, often managed initially with CNR. Patients with septal fractures should be counseled on the high risk of posttraumatic nasal deformity and obstruction despite CNR. In addition, addressing a septal fracture found on imaging may be warranted with either closed septal reduction or early aggressive management given the poorer outcomes seen in the present study. Although these patients are more likely to have definitive treatment, many forego later intervention despite persistent symptoms, emphasizing the need for early intervention or close follow-up. Level of Evidence 3 Laryngoscope, 129:1784-1790, 2019