共 50 条
Efficacy and Safety of Pegylated Interferon Plus Ribavirin Therapy for Chronic Hepatitis C Genotype 6: A Meta-Analysis
被引:13
|作者:
Wang, Xiwei
[1
]
Liu, Fen
[1
]
Wei, Fang
[1
]
Ren, Hong
[1
]
Hu, Huaidong
[1
]
机构:
[1] Chongqing Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 2, Dept Infect Dis, Inst Viral Hepatitis,Key Lab Mol Biol Infect Dis, Chongqing, Peoples R China
来源:
关键词:
RESPONSE-GUIDED THERAPY;
VIROLOGICAL RESPONSE;
COMBINATION THERAPY;
HCV GENOTYPE-2;
VIRUS;
INFECTION;
EPIDEMIOLOGY;
STRATEGIES;
D O I:
10.1371/journal.pone.0100128
中图分类号:
O [数理科学和化学];
P [天文学、地球科学];
Q [生物科学];
N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号:
07 ;
0710 ;
09 ;
摘要:
Background: Hepatitis C genotype 6 (HCV-6) is prevalent in Southeast Asia. Data on the efficacy of direct-acting antiviral agents in chronic HCV-6 patients is limited and pegylated interferon (Peg-IFN) plus ribavirin (RBV) combination therapy remains standard therapy for those patients. Aim: Meta-analysis was performed to assess the efficacy and safety of Peg-IFN plus RBV combination therapy for chronic HCV-6 patients. Methods: Relevant studies were found by database search through Medline, Embase, Web of Science and The Cochrane Library. All published clinical trials assessing the efficacy of Peg-IFN plus RBV combination therapy for chronic HCV-6 patients were included. Sustained virological response rate (SVR) was pooled. We performed additional meta-analyses to compare the SVR outcomes of 24 versus 48 weeks of treatment in four head-to-head trials. Another second meta-analysis was also conducted to compare the efficacy of combination Peg-IFN plus RBV therapy in HCV-6 versus HCV-1 patients. Results: Thirteen studies met the inclusion criteria. The pooled SVR of all single arms was 75% (95% CI: 0.68-0.81). The SVR of 24 weeks treatment was significantly lower than that at 48 weeks, with a risk difference of 214% (95% CI: 20.25 to 20.02, p = 0.02). However, when restricted to the patients with rapid virological response (RVR), there was no significant effect on SVR between these two treatment groups, with a risk difference of 21% (95% CI: 20.1 to 0.07, p = 0.67). The SVR in HCV-6 patients was significantly higher than that in HCV-1 patients, with a relative risk of 1.35 (95% CI: 1.16-1.57, p < 0.001). Side effects were common, but rarely caused treatment discontinuation. Conclusions: The results of this meta-analysis suggest that Peg-IFN plus RBV is effective and safe for HCV-6 patients. Shortening treatment seems to be feasible in HCV-6 patients with RVR when tolerance to treatment is poor. However, this decision should be made cautiously.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文