Seeing me, hearing me, imagining me

The author discusses a clinical session in which the subjective object was constituted following the destruction of the traces left by the object in person, that is, the analyst. An interpretation of the transference in the second topic, <<imagining me isn't the same as seeing me>>, underlines the strangeness of the process in the session, the confusion between phantasy and perception and triggers the evoking of a screenmemory whose repetition, enacted in the transference and followed by dreams, enabled us to decompose it into a splitting of identifications of the ego with the father. The transference on theory indicated the counter-transference.