The Association Between Satisfaction and Commitment Differs Across Marital Couple Types

被引:26
|
作者
Givertz, Michelle [1 ]
Segrin, Chris [2 ]
Hanzal, Alesia [3 ]
机构
[1] Calif State Univ Chico, Dept Commun Arts & Sci, Chico, CA 95929 USA
[2] Univ Arizona, Dept Commun, Tucson, AZ 85721 USA
[3] Univ Kansas, Dept Commun Studies, Lawrence, KS 66045 USA
关键词
marital couple types; satisfaction; personal commitment; dedication commitment; constraint commitment; INVESTMENT MODEL; CLOSE RELATIONSHIPS; CONFLICT; QUALITY; ROLES;
D O I
10.1177/0093650209333035
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
Research and theory indicate that satisfaction is a key determinant of commitment. Because some marriages are defined by a traditional ideology that anchors commitment in a value system rather than inherent rewards of the relationship, the association between satisfaction and commitment was expected to vary by couple type. Participants completed self-report measures of relational ideology, autonomy, communication, satisfaction, and several types of commitment. Results indicated that separate couples reported the lowest marital satisfaction and personal commitment of all the couple types. Separate couples also reported the lowest dedication commitment of all the couple types, whereas traditional couples reported the highest. The opposite pattern emerged for constraint commitment; separate couples reported the highest and traditional couples reported the lowest. Finally, actor-partner interdependence models revealed strong and positive associations between satisfaction and commitment for separate couples, as well as for wives in independent couples, but no such association among traditional couples.
引用
收藏
页码:561 / 584
页数:24
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Couple Types, Ethnicity and Marital Satisfaction in Malaysia
    Mustafa, Hasrina
    Hasim, Marshina Juliza Mohd
    Aripin, Norizah
    Hamid, Hamidah Abdul
    APPLIED RESEARCH IN QUALITY OF LIFE, 2013, 8 (03) : 299 - 317
  • [2] Couple Types, Ethnicity and Marital Satisfaction in Malaysia
    Hasrina Mustafa
    Marshina Juliza Mohd Hasim
    Norizah Aripin
    Hamidah Abdul Hamid
    Applied Research in Quality of Life, 2013, 8 : 299 - 317
  • [3] The association between forgiveness and marital satisfaction
    Hosseini, Ashrafalsadat
    Younesi, Seyed Jallal
    Ghaheh, Hooria Seyedhosseini
    Aryanpur, Hadis
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2012, 47 : 187 - 187
  • [4] Couple-Level Patterns of Disclosure Process Beliefs and Their Association with Marital Satisfaction
    Crapo, J. Scott
    Miller, Jacqueline A.
    Rhodes, Mitchell R.
    Bradford, Kay
    Higginbotham, Brian J.
    MARRIAGE AND FAMILY REVIEW, 2020, 56 (07): : 657 - 676
  • [5] A PSYCHOMETRIC EXPLORATION OF MARITAL SATISFACTION AND COMMITMENT
    JONES, WH
    ADAMS, JM
    MONROE, PR
    BERRY, JO
    JOURNAL OF SOCIAL BEHAVIOR AND PERSONALITY, 1995, 10 (04): : 923 - 932
  • [6] Predicting the marital satisfaction of musicians and their partners from attachment, commitment, attention to alternatives, couple style and personality
    Costello, J
    Findlay, B
    AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2005, 57 : 283 - 284
  • [7] The Mediating Effects of Autonomy, Competence, and Relatedness During Couple Leisure on the Relationship Between Total Couple Leisure Satisfaction and Marital Satisfaction
    Amato, Miriam Puerta
    Lundberg, Neil
    Ward, Peter J.
    Schaalje, Bruce G.
    Zabriskie, Ramon
    JOURNAL OF LEISURE RESEARCH, 2016, 48 (05) : 349 - 373
  • [8] Couple similarity on stimulus characteristics and marital satisfaction
    George, Darren
    Luo, Shanhong
    Webb, Jared
    Pugh, Jennifer
    Martinez, Alan
    Foulston, Jeremy
    PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2015, 86 : 126 - 131
  • [9] Marital satisfaction as an expression of adjustment to couple life
    Clinciu, A. I.
    PSYCHOLOGY & HEALTH, 2012, 27 : 181 - 181
  • [10] Couple Communication as a Mediator Between Work-Family Conflict and Marital Satisfaction
    Carroll S.J.
    Hill E.J.
    Yorgason J.B.
    Larson J.H.
    Sandberg J.G.
    Contemporary Family Therapy, 2013, 35 (3) : 530 - 545