Patient-ventilator asynchrony in acute brain-injured patients: a prospective observational study

被引:16
|
作者
Luo, Xu-Ying [1 ]
He, Xuan [1 ]
Zhou, Yi-Min [1 ]
Wang, Yu-Mei [1 ]
Chen, Jing-Ran [1 ]
Chen, Guang-Qiang [1 ]
Li, Hong-Liang [1 ]
Yang, Yan-Lin [1 ]
Zhang, Linlin [1 ]
Zhou, Jian-Xin [1 ]
机构
[1] Capital Med Univ, Beijing Tiantan Hosp, Dept Crit Care Med, 119 South 4th Ring West Rd, Beijing 100070, Peoples R China
关键词
Mechanical ventilation; Asynchrony; Prevalence; Severity; Monitoring; Brain injury; MECHANICAL VENTILATION; INEFFECTIVE EFFORTS; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1186/s13613-020-00763-8
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Background: Patient-ventilator asynchrony is common in mechanically ventilated patients and may be related to adverse outcomes. Few studies have reported the occurrence of asynchrony in brain-injured patients. We aimed to investigate the prevalence, type and severity of patient-ventilator asynchrony in mechanically ventilated patients with brain injury. Methods: This prospective observational study enrolled acute brain-injured patients undergoing mechanical ventilation. Esophageal pressure monitoring was established after enrollment. Flow, airway pressure, and esophageal pressure-time waveforms were recorded for a 15-min interval, four times daily for 3 days, for visually detecting asynchrony by offline analysis. At the end of each dataset recording, the respiratory drive was determined by the airway occlusion maneuver. The asynchrony index was calculated to represent the severity. The relationship between the prevalence and the severity of asynchrony with ventilatory modes and settings, respiratory drive, and analgesia and sedation were determined. Association of severe patient-ventilator asynchrony, which was defined as an asynchrony index >= 10%, with clinical outcomes was analyzed. Results: In 100 enrolled patients, a total of 1076 15-min waveform datasets covering 330,292 breaths were collected, in which 70,156 (38%) asynchronous breaths were detected. Asynchrony occurred in 96% of patients with the median (interquartile range) asynchrony index of 12.4% (4.3%-26.4%). The most prevalent type was ineffective triggering. No significant difference was found in either prevalence or asynchrony index among different classifications of brain injury (p < 0.05). The prevalence of asynchrony was significantly lower during pressure control/assist ventilation than during other ventilatory modes (p 0.05). Compared to the datasets without asynchrony, the airway occlusion pressure was significantly lower in datasets with ineffective triggering (p < 0.001). The asynchrony index was significantly higher during the combined use of opioids and sedatives (p < 0.001). Significantly longer duration of ventilation and hospital length of stay after the inclusion were found in patients with severe ineffective triggering (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Patient-ventilator asynchrony is common in brain-injured patients. The most prevalent type is ineffective triggering and its severity is likely related to a long duration of ventilation and hospital stay. Prevalence and severity of asynchrony are associated with ventilatory modes, respiratory drive and analgesia/sedation strategy, suggesting treatment adjustment in this particular population.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Patient–ventilator asynchrony in acute brain-injured patients: a prospective observational study
    Xu-Ying Luo
    Xuan He
    Yi-Min Zhou
    Yu-Mei Wang
    Jing-Ran Chen
    Guang-Qiang Chen
    Hong-Liang Li
    Yan-Lin Yang
    Linlin Zhang
    Jian-Xin Zhou
    Annals of Intensive Care, 10
  • [2] Patient-Ventilator Asynchrony in a Traumatically Injured Population
    Robinson, Bryce R. H.
    Blakeman, Thomas C.
    Toth, Peter
    Hanseman, Dennis J.
    Mueller, Eric
    Branson, Richard D.
    RESPIRATORY CARE, 2013, 58 (11) : 1847 - 1855
  • [3] Observational study of patient-ventilator asynchrony and relationship to sedation level
    de Wit, Marjolein
    Pedram, Sammy
    Best, Al M.
    Epstein, Scott K.
    JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE, 2009, 24 (01) : 74 - 80
  • [4] Patient-ventilator asynchrony
    Murias, Gaston
    Lucangelo, Umberto
    Blanch, Lluis
    CURRENT OPINION IN CRITICAL CARE, 2016, 22 (01) : 53 - 59
  • [5] Patient-ventilator asynchrony
    Holanda, Marcelo Alcantara
    Vasconcelos, Renata dos Santos
    Ferreira, Juliana Carvalho
    Pinheiro, Bruno Valle
    JORNAL BRASILEIRO DE PNEUMOLOGIA, 2018, 44 (04) : 321 - 333
  • [6] Patient-Ventilator Asynchrony: Adapt the Ventilator, Not the Patient!
    Wrigge, Hermann
    Reske, Andreas W.
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2013, 41 (09) : 2240 - 2241
  • [7] Monitoring patient-ventilator asynchrony
    Dres, Martin
    Rittayamai, Nuttapol
    Brochard, Laurent
    CURRENT OPINION IN CRITICAL CARE, 2016, 22 (03) : 246 - 253
  • [8] Management of Patient-Ventilator Asynchrony
    Bailey, James M.
    ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2021, 134 (04) : 629 - 636
  • [9] Patient-ventilator asynchrony in adult critically ill patients
    Bruni, Andrea
    Garofalo, Eugenio
    Pelaia, Corrado
    Messina, Antonio
    Cammarota, Gianmaria
    Murabito, Paolo
    Corrado, Silvia
    Vetrugno, Luigi
    Longhini, Federico
    Navalesi, Paolo
    MINERVA ANESTESIOLOGICA, 2019, 85 (06) : 676 - 688
  • [10] Patient-ventilator asynchrony: Heartbeat autotrigger
    Embid, Cristina
    Dalmases, Mireia
    Lopez-Escuredo, Lidia
    SLEEP MEDICINE, 2024, 124 : 424 - 425