Comparative Analysis of Energy and Exergy Performance of Hydrogen Production Methods

被引:32
|
作者
Martinez-Rodriguez, Angel [1 ]
Abanades, Alberto [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Politecn Madrid, ETSII UPM, Energy Engn Dept, C Jose Gutierrez Abascal 2, Madrid 28006, Spain
关键词
hydrogen production; energy analysis; exergy analysis; hydrogen economy; hydrogen methods comparison; POWER-TO-GAS; PARTIAL OXIDATION; CARBON CAPTURE; METHANE; EFFICIENCY; DRY;
D O I
10.3390/e22111286
中图分类号
O4 [物理学];
学科分类号
0702 ;
摘要
The study of the viability of hydrogen production as a sustainable energy source is a current challenge, to satisfy the great world energy demand. There are several techniques to produce hydrogen, either mature or under development. The election of the hydrogen production method will have a high impact on practical sustainability of the hydrogen economy. An important profile for the viability of a process is the calculation of energy and exergy efficiencies, as well as their overall integration into the circular economy. To carry out theoretical energy and exergy analyses we have estimated proposed hydrogen production using different software (DWSIM and MATLAB) and reference conditions. The analysis consolidates methane reforming or auto-thermal reforming as the viable technologies at the present state of the art, with reasonable energy and exergy efficiencies, but pending on the impact of environmental constraints as CO2 emission countermeasures. However, natural gas or electrolysis show very promising results, and should be advanced in their technological and maturity scaling. Electrolysis shows a very good exergy efficiency due to the fact that electricity itself is a high exergy source. Pyrolysis exergy loses are mostly in the form of solid carbon material, which has a very high integration potential into the hydrogen economy.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 17
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A comprehensive comparative energy and exergy analysis in solar based hydrogen production systems
    Ozdemir, Aysenur
    Genc, Gamze
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2022, 47 (24) : 12189 - 12203
  • [2] Energy and exergy analysis of green hydrogen production
    Buyuk, Pinar
    Eryasar, Ahmet
    JOURNAL OF POLYTECHNIC-POLITEKNIK DERGISI, 2024,
  • [3] Exergy analysis of hydrogen production methods from biomass
    Ptasinski, Krzysztof J.
    Prins, Mark J.
    van der Heijden, Simon P.
    ECOS 2006: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 19TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EFFICIENCY, COST, OPTIMIZATION, SIMULATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT OF ENERGY SYSTEMS, VOLS 1-3, 2006, : 1601 - +
  • [4] A review on exergy comparison of hydrogen production methods from renewable energy sources
    Christopher, Koroneos
    Dimitrios, Rovas
    ENERGY & ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2012, 5 (05) : 6640 - 6651
  • [5] Exergy analysis of biological hydrogen production
    Modarresi, Ala
    Wukovits, Walter
    Friedl, Anton
    18TH EUROPEAN SYMPOSIUM ON COMPUTER AIDED PROCESS ENGINEERING, 2008, 25 : 1137 - 1142
  • [6] Energy and exergy analysis of hydrogen production by solid oxide steam electrolyzer plant
    Ni, Meng
    Leung, Michael K. H.
    Leung, DennisY. C.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2007, 32 (18) : 4648 - 4660
  • [7] Energy and exergy analysis as tools for optimization of hydrogen production by glycerol autothermal reforming
    Hajjaji, Noureddine
    Baccar, Ines
    Pons, Marie-Noelle
    RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2014, 71 : 368 - 380
  • [8] Energy/exergy, economic, and environment (3E) analysis of the hydrogen energy production process
    Nugroho, Rusdan Aditya Aji
    Hsu, Hsin-Wei
    Wang, Wei-Cheng
    Utomo, Valencia Lilian
    Saputro, Herman
    Sittijunda, Sureewan
    Kuo, Jenn-Kun
    Surjasatyo, Adi
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2025, 103 : 467 - 479
  • [9] Comparative energy and exergy analyses of two solar-based integrated hydrogen production systems
    Ratlamwala, T. A. H.
    Dincer, I.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2015, 40 (24) : 7568 - 7578
  • [10] Energy and exergy analyses of hydrogen production by coal gasification
    Seyitoglu, S. S.
    Dincer, I.
    Kilicarslan, A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2017, 42 (04) : 2592 - 2600