Stochastic Forecast of Flow Reservoir Behaviour

被引:2
|
作者
Kozel, Tomas [1 ]
Stary, Milos [1 ]
机构
[1] Brno Univ Technol, Fac Civil Engn, Inst Landscape Water Management, Veveri 331-95, Brno 60200, Czech Republic
关键词
stochastic; forecasting; average monthly flow;
D O I
10.1016/j.proeps.2015.08.150
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
The main advantage of stochastic forecasting of flow reservoir behaviour is the fan of a possible value, which deterministic methods of forecasting could not give us. Future development of random process is described well by first stochastic then deterministic forecasting. We can categorize the discharge in measurement profile as a random process. The contents of this article is the development of a forecasting model for the management of large open water reservoirs with supply function. The model is based on a linear autoregressive model, which forecasts values of average monthly flow from a linear combination of previous values of average monthly flow, autoregressive coefficients and random numbers. The autoregressive coefficient was calculated from the Yule-Walker equations [2, 3]. The model was compiled for the forecasts in the range of 1 to 12 month with a backward correlation of 2 to 11 months. The data was freed of asymmetry with the help of the Box-Cox rule [1], the value r was found by optimization. In the next step, the data was transform to a standard normal distribution. Our data was with monthly step and forecasting was recurrent. We used a 90-year long real flow series;Of to compile the model. The first 75 years were used for the calibration of the model (autoregressive coefficient), the last 15 years were used only for validation. The model outputs were compared with the real flow series. For comparison between real flow series (100% successful of forecast) and forecasts, we used as values of forecast average, median, modus and miscellaneous quintiles. Results were statistically evaluated on a monthly level. The main criterion of success was the absolute error between real and forecasted flow. Results show that the longest backward correlation did not give the best results. On the other hand, the flow in months, which were forecasted recurrently, give a smaller error than flow forecasted from real flow. For each length of forecast, even for backward size of correlation, different values of quintiles were reached, for which forecasting values gave the smallest error, [4, 5]. Flows forecasted by the model give very fine results in drought periods. Higher errors were reached in months with higher average flows. This higher flow was caused by floods. The floods are predictable. Due to good results in drought, periods we can use the model managed large open water reservoirs with supply function. (C) 2015 Published by Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:940 / 944
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The real time stochastic flow forecast
    Brezkova, L.
    Stary, M.
    Dolezal, P.
    INTEGRATING WATER SYSTEMS, 2010, : 295 - 300
  • [2] ANNs and inflow forecast to aid stochastic optimization of reservoir operation
    Silva Santos, Kelly Marina
    Celeste, Alcigeimes B.
    El-Shafie, Ahmed
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED WATER ENGINEERING AND RESEARCH, 2019, 7 (04): : 314 - 323
  • [3] The Real-time Stochastic Flow Forecast
    Brezkova, Lucie
    Stary, Milos
    Dolezal, Petr
    SOIL AND WATER RESEARCH, 2010, 5 (02) : 49 - 57
  • [4] CONDITIONAL FLOW SIMULATION - A STOCHASTIC FORECAST MODEL
    ZUZEL, JF
    WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 1981, 17 (03) : 595 - 601
  • [5] River flow forecast for reservoir management through neural networks
    Baratti, R
    Cannas, B
    Fanni, A
    Pintus, M
    Sechi, GM
    Toreno, N
    NEUROCOMPUTING, 2003, 55 (3-4) : 421 - 437
  • [6] GOOD PRODUCTION RATE FORECAST BASED ON FLOW, RESERVOIR ANALYSIS.
    El-Feky, Samy A.
    1600, (85):
  • [7] GOOD PRODUCTION-RATE FORECAST BASED ON FLOW, RESERVOIR ANALYSIS
    ELFEKY, SA
    OIL & GAS JOURNAL, 1987, 85 (11) : 48 - &
  • [8] Stochastic Optimal Power Flow Under Forecast Errors and Failures in Communication
    Alnajjab, Basel
    Lamadrid, Alberto J.
    Snyder, Lawrence V.
    Kishore, Shalinee
    Blum, Rick S.
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SMART GRID, 2019, 10 (04) : 4128 - 4137
  • [9] Sensitivity of Forecast Value in Multiobjective Reservoir Operation to Forecast Lead Time and Reservoir Characteristics
    Yang, Guang
    Guo, Shenglian
    Liu, Pan
    Block, Paul
    JOURNAL OF WATER RESOURCES PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT, 2021, 147 (06)
  • [10] Stochastic simulation model of forecast errors in the process of reservoir runoff based on IGMM-Copula
    Zhang Y.
    Zhang J.
    Tai Y.
    Ji C.
    Ma Q.
    Shuili Xuebao/Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2021, 52 (06): : 689 - 699