Changes in hospital safety following penalties in the US Hospital Acquired Condition Reduction Program: retrospective cohort study

被引:36
|
作者
Sankaran, Roshun [1 ,2 ]
Sukul, Devraj [2 ]
Nuliyalu, Ushapoorna [3 ,4 ]
Gulseren, Baris [1 ]
Engler, Tedi A. [1 ,3 ]
Arntson, Emily [1 ,2 ]
Zlotnick, Hanna [5 ]
Dimick, Justin B. [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Ryan, Andrew M. [1 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Sch Publ Hlth, 1415 Washington Hts, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[2] Univ Michigan, Med Sch, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[3] Ctr Healthcare Outcomes & Policy, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[4] Inst Healthcare Policy & Innovat, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[5] Univ Michigan, Gerald R Ford Sch Publ Policy, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
来源
基金
美国医疗保健研究与质量局;
关键词
REGRESSION DISCONTINUITY DESIGNS; READMISSION REDUCTION; HEALTH-CARE; ASSOCIATION; PERFORMANCE; INFECTIONS; OUTCOMES; QUALITY; RATES; PAY;
D O I
10.1136/bmj.l4109
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the association between hospital penalization in the US Hospital Acquired Condition Reduction Program (HACRP) and subsequent changes in clinical outcomes. DESIGN Regression discontinuity design applied to a retrospective cohort from inpatient Medicare claims. SETTING 3238 acute care hospitals in the United States. PARTICIPANTS Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries discharged from acute care hospitals between 23 July 2014 and 30 November 2016 and eligible for at least one targeted hospital acquired condition (n=15 470 334). INTERVENTION Hospital receipt of a penalty in the first year of the HACRP. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Episode level count of targeted hospital acquired conditions per 1000 episodes, 30 day readmissions, and 30 day mortality. RESULTS Of 724 hospitals penalized under the HACRP in fiscal year 2015, 708 were represented in the study. Mean counts of hospital acquired conditions were 2.72 per 1000 episodes for penalized hospitals and 2.06 per 1000 episodes for non-penalized hospitals; 30 day readmissions were 14.4% and 14.0%, respectively, and 30 day mortality was 9.0% for both hospital groups. Penalized hospitals were more likely to be large, teaching institutions, and have a greater share of patients with low socioeconomic status than non-penalized hospitals. HACRP penalties were associated with a non-significant change of -0.16 hospital acquired conditions per 1000 episodes (95% confidence interval -0.53 to 0.20), -0.36 percentage points in 30 day readmission (-1.06 to 0.33), and -0.04 percentage points in 30 day mortality (-0.59 to 0.52). No clear patterns of clinical improvement were observed across hospital characteristics. CONCLUSIONS Penalization was not associated with significant changes in rates of hospital acquired conditions, 30 day readmission, or 30 day mortality, and does not appear to drive meaningful clinical improvements. By disproportionately penalizing hospitals caring for more disadvantaged patients, the HACRP could exacerbate inequities in care.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Hospital Characteristics Associated With Penalties in the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Hospital-Acquired Condition Reduction Program
    Rajaram, Ravi
    Chung, Jeanette W.
    Kinnier, Christine V.
    Barnard, Cynthia
    Mohanty, Sanjay
    Pavey, Emily S.
    McHugh, Megan C.
    Bilimoria, Karl Y.
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2015, 314 (04): : 375 - 383
  • [2] Changes in Hospital-acquired Conditions and Mortality Associated With the Hospital-acquired Condition Reduction Program
    Arntson, Emily
    Dimick, Justin B.
    Nuliyalu, Ushapoorna
    Errickson, Josh
    Engler, Tedi A.
    Ryan, Andrew M.
    ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2021, 274 (04) : E301 - E307
  • [3] Teaching and Safety-Net Hospital Penalization in the Hospital-Acquired Condition Reduction Program
    Serpa, Jose A.
    Gemeinhardt, Gretchen
    Arias, Cesar A.
    Morgan, Robert O.
    Russell, Heidi
    Miao, Hongyu
    Cazaban, Cecilia M. Ganduglia
    JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2024, 7 (02) : E2356196
  • [4] The Hospital-Acquired Condition Reduction Program
    Brooks, Jo Ann
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NURSING, 2017, 117 (10) : 63 - 66
  • [5] Hospital-Acquired Condition Reduction Program Is Not Associated With Additional Patient Safety Improvement
    Sheetz, Kyle H.
    Dimick, Justin B.
    Englesbe, Michael J.
    Ryan, Andrew M.
    HEALTH AFFAIRS, 2019, 38 (11) : 1858 - 1865
  • [6] Introduction to the Hospital-Acquired Condition Reduction Program for Pharmacy
    Kripal, Joni
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACY BENEFITS, 2016, 8 (05) : 181 - 184
  • [7] Is the CMS Hospital-Acquired Condition Reduction Program a Valid Measure of Hospital Performance?
    Fuller, Richard L.
    Goldfield, Norbert I.
    Averill, Richard F.
    Hughes, John S.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL QUALITY, 2017, 32 (03) : 254 - 260
  • [8] A Comparison of Estimated Cost Savings from Potential Reductions in Hospital-Acquired Conditions to Levied Penalties Under the CMS Hospital-Acquired Condition Reduction Program
    Sankaran, Roshun
    Gulseren, Baris
    Nuliyalu, Ushapoorna
    Dimick, Justin B.
    Sheetz, Kyle
    Arntson, Emily
    Chhabra, Karan
    Ryan, Andrew M.
    JOINT COMMISSION JOURNAL ON QUALITY AND PATIENT SAFETY, 2020, 46 (08): : 438 - 447
  • [9] Readmissions, penalties, and the Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program
    Kulaylat, Audrey S.
    Jung, Jeah
    Hollenbeak, Christopher S.
    Messaris, Evangelos
    SEMINARS IN COLON AND RECTAL SURGERY, 2018, 29 (02) : 55 - 59
  • [10] ANALYSIS OF NATIONAL TRENDS IN HOSPITAL ACQUIRED CONDITIONS FOLLOWING MAJOR UROLOGIC SURGERY BEFORE AND AFTER IMPLEMENTATION OF THE HOSPITAL ACQUIRED CONDITION REDUCTION PROGRAM
    Rude, Temitope
    Donin, Nicholas
    Cohn, Matthew
    Meeks, William
    Gulig, Scott
    Wysock, James
    Makarov, Danil
    Bjurlin, Marc
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2017, 197 (04): : E1300 - E1300