Development and consensus testing of quality indicators for geriatric pharmacotherapy in primary care using a modified Delphi study

被引:4
|
作者
Sato, Noriko [1 ]
Fujita, Kenji [2 ,3 ]
Kushida, Kazuki [4 ]
Chen, Timothy F. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sydney, Fac Med & Hlth, Sch Pharm, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[2] Univ Sydney, Fac Med & Hlth, Kolling Inst, Dept Clin Pharmacol, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[3] Univ Sydney, Fac Med & Hlth, Kolling Inst, Dept Aged Care, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[4] Showa Pharmaceut Univ, Fac Pharm, Tokyo, Japan
关键词
Community pharmacy; Geriatric pharmacotherapy; Older people; Primary care; Quality indicators; PHARMACEUTICAL CARE; SCREENING TOOL; OLDER-PEOPLE; HEALTH; PHARMACISTS; PRESCRIPTIONS; INTERVENTIONS; METAANALYSIS; CRITERIA; PATIENT;
D O I
10.1007/s11096-022-01375-x
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Background Polypharmacy is associated with an increased risk of adverse drug events in older people. Although national guidance on geriatric pharmacotherapy exists in Japan, tools to routinely monitor the quality of care provided by community pharmacists are lacking. Aim To develop a set of quality indicators (QIs) to measure the quality of care provided by community pharmacists in improving geriatric pharmacotherapy in primary care in Japan, using a modified Delphi study. Method The development of QIs for the Japanese community pharmacy context followed a two-step process: national guidance review and consensus testing using a modified Delphi study. The latter involved two rounds of rating with a face-to-face meeting between the rounds. Ten experts in geriatric pharmacotherapy in primary care were recruited for the panel discussion. QIs were mapped to three key taxonomies and frameworks: the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) classification system, problems and causes of drug-related problems (DRPs) taxonomy and Donabedian's framework. Results A total of 134 QIs for geriatric pharmacotherapy were developed. This QI set included 111 medicine specific indicators, covering medicines in 243 third-level ATC classifications. QIs were classified into the problem of treatment safety (80%) and causes of drug selection (38%) based on validated classification for DRPs. In Donabedian's framework, most QIs (82%) were process indicators. There were no structure indicators. Conclusion A set of 134 QIs for geriatric pharmacotherapy was rigorously developed. Measurement properties of these QIs will be evaluated for feasibility, applicability, room for improvement, sensitivity to change, predictive validity, acceptability and implementation issues in a subsequent study.
引用
收藏
页码:517 / 538
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Development and consensus testing of quality indicators for geriatric pharmacotherapy in primary care using a modified Delphi study
    Noriko Sato
    Kenji Fujita
    Kazuki Kushida
    Timothy F. Chen
    International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy, 2022, 44 : 517 - 538
  • [2] Development of consensus quality indicators for cancer supportive care: a Delphi study and pilot testing
    Amelia Hyatt
    Karla Gough
    Holly Chung
    Wendy Wood
    Ruth Aston
    Jo Cockwill
    Spiridoula Galetakis
    Meinir Krishnasamy
    BMC Health Services Research, 24
  • [3] Development of consensus quality indicators for cancer supportive care: a Delphi study and pilot testing
    Hyatt, Amelia
    Gough, Karla
    Chung, Holly
    Wood, Wendy
    Aston, Ruth
    Cockwill, Jo
    Galetakis, Spiridoula
    Krishnasamy, Meinir
    BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2024, 24 (01)
  • [4] Validation of quality indicators for evaluating geriatric pharmacotherapy services in primary care: a mixed methods study
    Sato, Noriko
    Fujita, Kenji
    Okada, Hiroshi
    Kushida, Kazuki
    Chen, Timothy F.
    BMJ OPEN, 2023, 13 (03):
  • [5] Development of care quality indicators for palliative care in China: A modified Delphi method study
    Zheng, Hongling
    Cheng, Qinqin
    Xu, Xianghua
    Yan, Yixia
    Luo, Ge
    Gong, Youwen
    Chen, Yongyi
    ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY NURSING, 2023, 10 (12)
  • [6] Nationwide consensus on quality indicators to assess glaucoma care: A modified Delphi approach
    Iorio-Aranha, Flavio
    de Freitas, Claudia
    Rocha-Sousa, Amandio
    Azevedo, Ana
    Barbosa-Breda, Joao
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2024, 34 (01) : 217 - 225
  • [7] Development of Health Equity Indicators in Primary Health Care Organizations Using a Modified Delphi
    Wong, Sabrina T.
    Browne, Annette J.
    Varcoe, Colleen
    Lavoie, Josee
    Fridkin, Alycia
    Smye, Victoria
    Godwin, Olive
    Tu, David
    PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (12):
  • [8] Development of nursing quality care process metrics and indicators for intellectual disability services: a literature review and modified Delphi consensus study
    Doody, Owen
    Murphy, Fiona
    Lyons, Rosemary
    Gallen, Anne
    Ryan, Judy
    Downey, Johanna
    Sezgin, Duygu
    BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2019, 19 (01)
  • [9] Development of nursing quality care process metrics and indicators for intellectual disability services: a literature review and modified Delphi consensus study
    Owen Doody
    Fiona Murphy
    Rosemary Lyons
    Anne Gallen
    Judy Ryan
    Johanna Downey
    Duygu Sezgin
    BMC Health Services Research, 19
  • [10] Development and Validation of Quality Indicators for Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Management in Japan: A Modified Delphi Consensus Study
    Tamura, Yuichi
    Hosokawa, Kazuya
    Horimoto, Koshin
    Ikeda, Satoshi
    Inami, Takumi
    Kubota, Kayoko
    Nakanishi, Naohiko
    Shirai, Yuichiro
    Tanabe, Nobuhiro
    Tsujino, Ichizo
    Matsubara, Hiromi
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2024, 14 (23)