Towards Easy Comparison of Local Businesses Using Online Reviews

被引:16
|
作者
Wang, Yong [1 ]
Haleem, Hammad [1 ]
Shi, Conglei [2 ]
Wu, Yanhong [3 ]
Zhao, Xun [1 ]
Fu, Siwei [1 ]
Qu, Huamin [1 ]
机构
[1] Hong Kong Univ Sci & Technol, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[2] Airbnb Inc, San Francisco, CA USA
[3] Vis Res, Palo Alto, CA USA
关键词
VISUAL ANALYSIS; VISUALIZATION; EXPLORATION; DYNAMICS; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1111/cgf.13401
中图分类号
TP31 [计算机软件];
学科分类号
081202 ; 0835 ;
摘要
With the rapid development of e-commerce, there is an increasing number of online review websites, such as Yelp, to help customers make better purchase decisions. Viewing online reviews, including the rating score and text comments by other customers, and conducting a comparison between different businesses are the key to making an optimal decision. However, due to the massive amount of online reviews, the potential difference of user rating standards, and the significant variance of review time, length, details and quality, it is difficult for customers to achieve a quick and comprehensive comparison. In this paper, we present E-Comp, a carefully-designed visual analytics system based on online reviews, to help customers compare local businesses at different levels of details. More specifically, intuitive glyphs overlaid on maps are designed for quick candidate selection. Grouped Sankey diagram visualizing the rating difference by common customers is chosen for more reliable comparison of two businesses. Augmented word cloud showing adjective-noun word pairs, combined with a temporal view, is proposed to facilitate in-depth comparison of businesses in terms of different time periods, rating scores and features. The effectiveness and usability of E-Comp are demonstrated through a case study and in-depth user interviews.
引用
收藏
页码:63 / 74
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Towards optimising local reviews of severe incidents in maternity care: messages from a comparison of local and external reviews
    Shah, Anjali
    Kemp, Bryn
    Sellers, Susan
    Hinton, Lisa
    O'Connor, Melanie
    Brocklehurst, Peter
    Kurinczuk, Jenny
    Knight, Marian
    BMJ QUALITY & SAFETY, 2017, 26 (04) : 271 - 278
  • [2] Online reviews towards reducing risk
    Yadav, Neha
    Verma, Sanjeev
    Chikhalkar, Rekha
    JOURNAL OF TOURISM FUTURES, 2023, : 299 - 316
  • [3] ReviewCollage: A Mobile Interface for Direct Comparison Using Online Reviews
    Jin, Haojian
    Sakai, Tetsuya
    Yatani, Koji
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 16TH ACM INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON HUMAN-COMPUTER INTERACTION WITH MOBILE DEVICES AND SERVICES (MOBILEHCI'14), 2014, : 349 - 358
  • [4] Towards Collusive Fraud Detection in Online Reviews
    Xu, Chang
    Zhang, Jie
    2015 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON DATA MINING (ICDM), 2015, : 1051 - 1056
  • [5] Detecting Human Trafficking: Automated Classification of Online Customer Reviews of Massage Businesses
    Li, Ruoting
    Tobey, Margaret
    Mayorga, Maria E.
    Caltagirone, Sherrie
    Ozaltin, Osman Y.
    M&SOM-MANUFACTURING & SERVICE OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT, 2023, 25 (03) : 1051 - 1065
  • [6] Use and Impact of Online Travel Reviews for Planning Free and Easy Holidays
    Halawani, Yahya Mohamad
    Soh, Patrick Chin-Hooi
    Halawani, Firas Mohamad
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SYSTEMS IN THE SERVICE SECTOR, 2022, 14 (01)
  • [7] Comparing online reviews of hyper-local restaurants using deductive content analysis
    Kim, Yoonah
    Rahman, Imran
    Bernard, Shaniel
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HOSPITALITY MANAGEMENT, 2020, 86
  • [8] The importance of behavioral data to identify online fake reviews for tourism businesses: a systematic review
    Reyes-Menendez, Ana
    Ramon Saura, Jose
    Filipe, Ferrao
    PEERJ COMPUTER SCIENCE, 2019, 2019 (09)
  • [9] Using online consumer reviews as a source for demographic recommendations: A case study using online travel reviews
    Korfiatis, Nikolaos
    Poulos, Marios
    EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2013, 40 (14) : 5507 - 5515
  • [10] Using Online Reviews in Social Care
    Trigg, Lisa
    SOCIAL POLICY & ADMINISTRATION, 2014, 48 (03) : 361 - 378