Outpatient Minimally Invasive Lumbar Fusion Using Multimodal Analgesic Management in the Ambulatory Surgery Setting

被引:18
|
作者
Parrish, James [1 ]
Jenkins, Nathaniel [1 ]
Rush, Augustus J. [1 ]
Massel, Dustin H. [1 ]
Hrynewycz, Nadia [1 ]
Brundage, Thomas [2 ]
Podnar, Jeffrey [3 ]
Singh, Kern [1 ]
机构
[1] Rush Univ, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Med Ctr, 1611 West Harrison St,Suite 300, Chicago, IL 60612 USA
[2] Midwest Anesthesia Partners LLC, Dept Anesthesiol, Naperville, IL USA
[3] Rush Univ, Dept Anesthesiol, Med Ctr, Chicago, IL 60612 USA
来源
关键词
lumbar fusion; minimally invasive surgery; ambulatory surgery center; multimodal analgesia; outpatient; day surgery; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN MANAGEMENT; PATIENT-CONTROLLED ANALGESIA; NONSTEROIDAL ANTIINFLAMMATORY DRUGS; INTERBODY FUSION; SPINAL-FUSION; DOUBLE-BLIND; KETOROLAC; DECOMPRESSION; GABAPENTIN; DISCHARGE;
D O I
10.14444/7146
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The transition of minimally invasive (MIS) spine surgery from the inpatient to outpatient setting has been aided by advances in multimodal analgesic (MMA) protocols. This clinical case series of patients demonstrates the feasibility of ambulatory MIS transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) and lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) procedures while using an enhanced MMA protocol. Methods: Consecutive MIS TLIF or LLIF procedures with percutaneous pedicle screw fixation and direct decompression in the ambulatory setting were reviewed. The procedures were performed using an MMA protocol. The ambulatory surgery center (ASC) did not allow for observation of patients for periods of time greater than 23 hours. We recorded patient demographics, perioperative, and postoperative characteristics. Results: Fifty consecutive patients were identified from September 2016 to July 2019. Forty-one patients (82%) underwent MIS TLIF, and 9 patients underwent MIS LLIF (18.0%). All patients were discharged on the same day of surgery. The mean length of stay was 4.5 hours and 3.8 hours for the TLIF and LLIF cohorts, respectively. Our review of medical records revealed no postoperative complications following either the TLIF or the LLIF procedures. Conclusions: The present study of 50 consecutive patients is the largest clinical series of ASC patients undergoing lumbar fusion procedures in a stand-alone facility with no extended postoperative observation capability. While using MMA protocol within the ASC, no postoperative complications were observed for either MIS TLIF or LLIF procedures. All patients were discharged from the ambulatory surgical center on the day of surgery with well-controlled postoperative pain.
引用
收藏
页码:970 / 981
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Letter to the Editor: "Outpatient Minimally Invasive Lumbar Fusion Using Multimodal Analgesic Management in the Ambulatory Surgery Setting"
    Soffin, Ellen M.
    Hughes, Alexander P.
    Beckman, James D.
    Sama, Andrew A.
    Cammisa, Frank P.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPINE SURGERY, 2021, 15 (05): : 848 - 849
  • [2] Letter to the Editor: ''Outpatient Minimally Invasive Lumbar Fusion Using Multimodal Analgesic Management in the Ambulatory Surgery Setting" Response
    Cha, Elliot D. K.
    Lynch, Conor P.
    Parrish, James M.
    Jenkins, Nathaniel W.
    Buvanendran, Asokumar
    Singh, Kern
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPINE SURGERY, 2021, 15 (05): : 850 - 852
  • [3] Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in the Outpatient Setting
    Emami, Arash
    Faloon, Michael
    Issa, Kimona
    Shafa, Eiman
    Pourtaheri, Sina
    Sinha, Kumar
    Hwang, Ki S.
    ORTHOPEDICS, 2016, 39 (06) : E1218 - E1222
  • [4] Multimodal Analgesic Management for Cervical Spine Surgery in the Ambulatory Setting
    Jenkins, Nathaniel W.
    Parrish, James M.
    Nolte, Michael T.
    Jadczak, Caroline N.
    Mohan, Shruthi
    Geoghegan, Cara E.
    Hrynewycz, Nadia M.
    Podnar, Jeffrey
    Buvanendran, Asokumar
    Singh, Kern
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPINE SURGERY, 2021, 15 (02): : 219 - 227
  • [5] Multimodal Analgesic Management for Lumbar Decompression Surgery in the Ambulatory Setting: Clinical Case Series and Review of the Literature
    Nolte, Michael T.
    Parrish, James M.
    Jenkins, Nathaniel W.
    Cha, Elliot D. K.
    Lynch, Conor P.
    Jacob, Kevin C.
    Patel, Madhav R.
    Jadczak, Caroline N.
    Geoghegan, Cara E.
    Mohan, Shruthi
    Podnar, Jeffrey
    Buvanendran, Asokumar
    Singh, Kern
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2021, 154 : E656 - E664
  • [6] Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in the Ambulatory Setting with an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocol
    Monk, Steve H.
    Rossi, Vincent J.
    Atkins, Tyler G.
    Karimian, Brandon
    Pfortmiller, Deborah
    Kim, Paul K.
    Adamson, Tim E.
    Smith, Mark D.
    McGirt, Matthew J.
    Holland, Christopher M.
    Deshmukh, Vinay R.
    Branch, Byron C.
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2023, 171 : E471 - E477
  • [7] Lumbar Fusion in Octogenarians The Promise of Minimally Invasive Surgery
    Rodgers, William Blake
    Gerber, Edward J.
    Rodgers, Jody A.
    SPINE, 2010, 35 (26) : S355 - S360
  • [8] Safety and Efficacy of Revision Minimally Invasive Lumbar Decompression in the Ambulatory Setting
    Hirsch, Brandon P.
    Khechen, Benjamin
    Patel, Dil V.
    Cardinal, Kaitlyn L.
    Guntin, Jordan A.
    Singh, Kern
    SPINE, 2019, 44 (08) : E494 - E499
  • [9] Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in the Ambulatory Surgery Center Versus Inpatient Setting: A 1-Year Comparative Effectiveness Analysis
    Monk, Steve H.
    Hani, Ummey
    Pfortmiller, Deborah
    Adamson, Tim E.
    Bohl, Michael A.
    Branch, Byron C.
    Kim, Paul K.
    Smith, Mark D.
    Holland, Christopher M.
    Mcgirt, Matthew J.
    NEUROSURGERY, 2023, 93 (04) : 867 - 874
  • [10] Minimally invasive lumbar fusion
    Foley, KT
    Holly, LT
    Schwender, JD
    SPINE, 2003, 28 (15) : S26 - S35