Developments in vapour cloud explosion blast modeling

被引:43
|
作者
Mercx, WPM
van den Berg, AC
Hayhurst, CJ
Robertson, NJ
Moran, KC
机构
[1] TNO, Prins Maurits Lab, NL-2280 AA Rijswijk, Netherlands
[2] Century Dynam, Horsham RH12 2DT, W Sussex, England
关键词
vapour cloud explosion; explosion simulation; blast prediction; quantitative risk analysis; source term prediction;
D O I
10.1016/S0304-3894(99)00085-0
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
TNT Equivalency methods are widely used for vapour cloud explosion blast modeling. Presently, however, other types of models are available which do not have the fundamental objections TNT Equivalency models have. TNO Multi-Energy method is increasingly accepted as a more reasonable alternative to be used as a simple and practical method, Computer codes based on computational fluid dynamics (CFD) like AutoReaGas, developed by TNO and Century Dynamics, could be used also in case a more rigorous analysis is required. Application of the Multi-Energy method requires knowledge of two parameters describing the explosion: a charge size and a charge strength. During the last years, research has led to an improved determination of the charge strength (i.e,, the class number or source overpressure) to be chosen to apply the blast charts. A correlation has been derived relating the charge strength to a set of parameters describing the boundary conditions of the flammable cloud and the fuel in the cloud. A simple approach may not be satisfactory in all situations. The overpressure distribution inside a vapour cloud explosion is generally not homogeneous and the presence of obstructions causes directional blast propagation in the near field. A CFD approach, in which che actual situation is modeled, supplies case-specific results. An overview of the key aspects relevant to the application of the Multi-Energy method and CFD modeling is provided. Then the application of the two methods is demonstrated for an example problem involving the calculation of the explosion blast load on a structure at some distance from the explosion in an offshore platform complex. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:301 / 319
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] METHODS FOR VAPOR CLOUD EXPLOSION BLAST MODELING
    VANDENBERG, AC
    LANNOY, A
    JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS, 1993, 34 (02) : 151 - 171
  • [2] Predicting uncertain effects of a blast load generated by an accidental vapour cloud explosion
    Sukys, Ritoldas
    Vaidogas, Egidijus R.
    9TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE: MODERN BUILDING MATERIALS, STRUCTURES AND TECHNIQUES, VOLS 1-3, 2008, : 1221 - 1226
  • [3] Buncefield: A violent, episodic vapour cloud explosion
    Atkinson, G.
    Cusco, L.
    PROCESS SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, 2011, 89 (06) : 360 - 370
  • [4] Minimizing uncertainty in vapour cloud explosion modelling
    Raman, R
    Grillo, P
    PROCESS SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, 2005, 83 (B4) : 298 - 306
  • [5] Sectioning of Potential Explosion Domains to Reduce the Severity of a Vapour Cloud Explosion
    Baron, Norbert
    Keim, Kelly K.
    Buchwald, Chris R.
    Hertoghe, Nicolas P.
    15TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON LOSS PREVENTION AND SAFETY PROMOTION (LOSS 2016), 2016, 48 : 319 - 324
  • [6] Vapour cloud chief suspect in Buncefield blast
    Kletz, Trevor
    TCE, 2006, (776): : 3 - 3
  • [7] Calculation of vapor cloud explosion blast parameters
    Zhu, JH
    Chen, JF
    PROGRESS IN SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, VOL II, PT A AND B, 2000, 2 : 745 - 749
  • [8] THE BUNCEFIELD EXPLOSION: VAPOUR CLOUD DISPERSION AND OTHER OBSERVATIONS
    Venart, J. E. S.
    Rogers, R. J.
    HAZARDS XXII: PROCESS SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, 2011, (156): : 519 - 527
  • [9] A review of very large vapour cloud explosions: Cloud formation and explosion severity
    Atkinson, Graham
    Cowpe, Edmund
    Halliday, Julie
    Painter, David
    JOURNAL OF LOSS PREVENTION IN THE PROCESS INDUSTRIES, 2017, 48 : 367 - 375
  • [10] Potential risk of vapour cloud explosion in FLNG liquefaction modules
    Park, Sayyoon
    Jeong, Byongug
    Lee, Byung Suk
    Oterkus, Selda
    Zhou, Peilin
    OCEAN ENGINEERING, 2018, 149 : 423 - 437