Women's values in contraceptive choice: a systematic review of relevant attributes included in decision aids

被引:56
|
作者
Wyatt, Kirk D. [1 ,2 ]
Anderson, Ryan T. [1 ,2 ]
Creedon, Douglas [3 ]
Montori, Victor M. [2 ,4 ,5 ]
Bachman, John [6 ]
Erwin, Patricia [7 ]
LeBlanc, Annie [2 ,5 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Mayo Clin & Mayo Fdn, Mayo Med Sch, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[2] Mayo Clin, Knowledge & Evaluat Res Unit, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[3] Mayo Clin, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[4] Mayo Clin, Dept Med, Div Endocrinol, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[5] Mayo Clin, Ctr Sci Healthcare Delivery, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[6] Mayo Clin, Dept Family Med, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[7] Mayo Clin, Mayo Clin Libraries, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[8] Mayo Clin, Dept Hlth Sci Res, Div Hlth Care Policy & Res, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
来源
BMC WOMENS HEALTH | 2014年 / 14卷
关键词
Shared decision making; Decision aid; Decision support tool; Contraception; Birth control; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; FAMILY-PLANNING CLIENTS; MAKING TOOL; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PROVIDERS; KNOWLEDGE; PREFERENCES; DISPARITIES; SELECTION; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1186/1472-6874-14-28
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: Women can choose from a range of contraceptive methods that differ in important ways. Inadequate decision support may lead them to select a method that poorly fits their circumstances, leading to dissatisfaction, misuse, or nonuse. Decision support interventions, such as decision aids, may help women choose a method of contraception that best fits their personal circumstances. To guide future decision aid development, we aim to summarize the attributes of contraceptive methods included in available decision aids as well as surveys and interviews of women actively choosing a contraceptive method. Methods: We conducted a systematic review to identify attributes of contraceptive methods that may be important to women when engaging in this decision making process. We performed a database search of MEDLINE/PubMed, Ovid EMBASE, OVID CENTRAL, Ovid PsycInfo, EBSCO CINAHL, Popline, and Scopus from 1985 until 2013 to identify decision aids, structured interviews and questionnaires reporting attributes of contraceptive options that are of importance to women. A free-text internet search was also performed to identify additional decision support tools. All articles and tools were reviewed in duplicate for inclusion, and a summary list of attributes was compiled. Results: We included 20 surveys, 1 semistructured interview report and 19 decision aids, reporting 32 unique attributes. While some attributes were consistently included in surveys/interviews and decision aids, several were included more often in decision aids as opposed to surveys/interviews (e.g., STI prevention, noncontraceptive benefits, how the method is used, requirement of a healthcare provider), and vice versa (e.g., a woman's vicarious experience with contraceptive methods). Key attributes mentioned in both surveys/interviews and decision aids include efficacy (29 total mentioned) and side effects/health risks (28 total mentioned). While a limited number of decision support tools were formally evaluated, many were not rigorously studied. Conclusions: Many attributes were identified as potentially important to women choosing a method of contraception, but these were inconsistently included in the reviewed resources. Formal evaluation of decision support tools for contraceptive choice and involvement of users in the development process may lead to more user-centered design and implementation.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Women’s values in contraceptive choice: a systematic review of relevant attributes included in decision aids
    Kirk D Wyatt
    Ryan T Anderson
    Douglas Creedon
    Victor M Montori
    John Bachman
    Patricia Erwin
    Annie LeBlanc
    BMC Women's Health, 14
  • [2] Young Women's Contraceptive Decision Making: Do Preferences for Contraceptive Attributes Align with Method Choice?
    Marshall, Cassondra
    Guendelman, Sylvia
    Mauldon, Jane
    Nuru-Jeter, Amani
    PERSPECTIVES ON SEXUAL AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH, 2016, 48 (03) : 119 - 127
  • [3] The role of contraceptive attributes in women's contraceptive decision making
    Madden, Tessa
    Secura, Gina M.
    Nease, Robert F.
    Politi, Mary C.
    Peipert, Jeffrey F.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2015, 213 (01) : 46.e1 - 46.e6
  • [4] Effectiveness of Contraceptive Decision Aids in Adolescents and Young Adults: A Systematic Review
    Jones, Anna
    Allison, Bianca A.
    Perry, Martha
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC AND ADOLESCENT GYNECOLOGY, 2022, 35 (01) : 7 - 17
  • [5] Women's contraceptive decision making: how well do women's preferences for certain contraceptive attributes align with the methods they use?
    Marshall, C.
    Guendelman, S.
    Mauldon, J.
    Nuru-Jeter, A.
    CONTRACEPTION, 2015, 92 (04) : 383 - 384
  • [6] Game attributes and their relation to the values considered relevant for women
    Machado, Monica da Consolacao
    Ishitani, Lucila
    DIGITAL CREATIVITY, 2024, 35 (03) : 274 - 299
  • [7] What attributes should be included in a discrete choice experiment related to health technologies? A systematic literature review
    Trapero-Bertran, Marta
    Rodriguez-Martin, Beatriz
    Lopez-Bastida, Julio
    PLOS ONE, 2019, 14 (07):
  • [8] Hormonal contraceptive choice for women with PCOS: a systematic review of randomized trials and observational studies
    Mendoza, Nicolas
    Simoncini, Tommaso
    Genazzani, Alessandro D.
    GYNECOLOGICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2014, 30 (12) : 850 - 860
  • [9] Effects of technology-based contraceptive decision aids: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Goueth, Rose C.
    Maki, Kristin G.
    Babatunde, Ayo
    Eden, Karen B.
    Darney, Blair G.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2022, 227 (05) : 705 - +
  • [10] Patient perceptions of a decision support tool to assist with young women's contraceptive choice
    Marshall, Cassondra
    Nuru-Jeter, Amani
    Guendelman, Sylvia
    Mauldon, Jane
    Raine-Bennett, Tina
    PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2017, 100 (02) : 343 - 348