Exploring Gender Differences in Online Consumer Purchase Decision Making: An Online Product Presentation Perspective

被引:94
|
作者
Lin, Xiaolin [1 ]
Featherman, Mauricio [2 ]
Brooks, Stoney L. [3 ]
Hajli, Nick [4 ]
机构
[1] Texas A&M Univ Corpus Christi, Coll Business, 6300 Ocean Dr, Corpus Christi, TX 78412 USA
[2] Washington State Univ, Todd Hall 442, Pullman, WA 99164 USA
[3] Middle Tennessee State Univ, Jones Coll Business, MTSU Box 45,Business & Aerosp N349, Murfreesboro, TN 37132 USA
[4] Univ Tehran, Tehran, Iran
关键词
E-commerce; Online purchase decision; Gender; Gender differences; The selectivity hypothesis; PERCEIVED RISK; TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE; ATTITUDES; INTERNET; WOMEN; PERCEPTIONS; INTENTIONS; COMMERCE; BEHAVIOR; AD;
D O I
10.1007/s10796-018-9831-1
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Gender effects remain poorly understood in the E-commerce setting. Using the selectivity model, this research further investigates gender differences in consumer Web-based purchase decisions. Specifically, gender differences in the effects of interactivity, vividness, diagnosticity, and perceived risk on subsequent consumer attitude and online purchase intentions are investigated and explained. An empirical survey-based research study in the e-commerce context found that gender differences exist in the relative influence of each antecedent. Specifically, interactivity and perceived risk influenced attitude formation more for males than females, while vividness and diagnosticity influenced attitude formation more for females than males. In addition, attitude toward online product presentation influenced purchase intention more strongly for males than females. For e-Commerce web-site designers and brand managers, our results highlight the importance of being gender aware when developing their web presence. While some sites may benefit from a gender-neutral design, others may benefit from a design based on results reported here.
引用
收藏
页码:1187 / 1201
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Exploring Gender Differences in Online Consumer Purchase Decision Making: An Online Product Presentation Perspective
    Xiaolin Lin
    Mauricio Featherman
    Stoney L. Brooks
    Nick Hajli
    Information Systems Frontiers, 2019, 21 : 1187 - 1201
  • [2] Exploring consumer online purchase and search behavior: An FCB grid perspective
    Huang, Shiu-Li
    Lin, Yi-Hsien
    ASIA PACIFIC MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2022, 27 (04) : 245 - 256
  • [3] Consumer Trust as the Antecedent of Online Consumer Purchase Decision
    Hidayat, Anas
    Wijaya, Tony
    Ishak, Asmai
    Endi Catyanadika, Putra
    INFORMATION, 2021, 12 (04)
  • [4] The impact of consumer archetypes on online purchase decision-making processes and outcomes: A behavioural process perspective
    Karimi, Sahar
    Holland, Christopher P.
    Papamichail, K. Nadia
    JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2018, 91 : 71 - 82
  • [5] The impact research of online reviews' sentiment polarity presentation on consumer purchase decision
    Wang, Qi
    Wang, Lin
    Zhang, Xiaohang
    Mao, Yunxia
    Wang, Peng
    INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY & PEOPLE, 2017, 30 (03) : 522 - 541
  • [6] The Influence of Consumer's Decision Making Process to Online Purchase Behavior Analysis
    Imaniya, Taliya
    Agus, Anna Amalyah
    2019 2ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF COMPUTER AND INFORMATICS ENGINEERING (IC2IE 2019): ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE ROLES IN INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION 4.0, 2019, : 116 - 121
  • [7] The effects of online product presentation on consumer responses: A mental imagery perspective
    Yoo, Jungmin
    Kim, Minjeong
    JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2014, 67 (11) : 2464 - 2472
  • [8] Gender differences in online shoppers' decision-making styles
    Yang, Chyan
    Wu, Chia Chun
    E-BUSINESS AND TELECOMMUNICATION NETWORKS, 2006, : 99 - +
  • [9] Consumer decision making in online environments
    Häubl, G
    ADVANCES IN CONSUMER RESEARCH, VOL 26, 1999, 26 : 477 - 477
  • [10] Exploring the Influence of Consumer Demographics on Online Purchase Benefits
    Bhat, Suhail Ahmad
    Darzi, Mushtaq Ahmad
    FIIB BUSINESS REVIEW, 2019, 8 (04) : 303 - 316