Half-body irradiation: A safe and acceptable treatment

被引:0
|
作者
Miszczyk, Leszek [1 ,2 ]
Gaborek, Aleksandra [3 ]
Tukiendorf, Andrzej [4 ]
Jochymek, Bozena [1 ,2 ]
Wydmanski, Jerzy [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Marie Sklodowska Curie Mem Canc Ctr, Dept Radiotherapy, PL-44100 Gliwice, Poland
[2] Inst Oncol, Gliwice Branch, PL-44100 Gliwice, Poland
[3] Good Compass Hosp, Gliwice, Poland
[4] Cardiff Res Consortium, Cardiff, S Glam, Wales
来源
MEDICAL SCIENCE MONITOR | 2009年 / 15卷 / 06期
关键词
hemibody irradiation; half-body irradiation; acute toxicity; palliative radiotherapy; bone metastases; HBI; HEMIBODY IRRADIATION; OSSEOUS METASTASES; BONE METASTASES; COMBINATION CHEMOTHERAPY; FIELD IRRADIATION; PROSTATE-CANCER; BREAST-CANCER; PHASE-III; PALLIATION; SINGLE;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Background: The aim of this study was all evaluation of the acute toxicity of single-fraction half-body irradiation (HBI). Material/Methods: The material comprised 92 patients. Upper, lower, and middle HBI (UHBI, LHBI, MHBI) were performed in 34, 49, and 9 cases, respectively, with 6 Gy delivered for UHBI, 8 Gy for LHBI, and 6 or 8 Gy for MHBI. The patients weights were measured on the HBI day. Two weeks later their weights and blood parameters were checked and diarrhea, skin toxicity (scale: 0-4), and nausea were evaluated using WHO Toxicity Criteria. Items of all the evaluated symptoms were summarized and the means of the sums were calculated. Results: Mean weight loss after HBI was 0.7 kg. One patient had grade 4 toxicity (thrombopenia). Grade 3 toxicity appeared ill 9 cases (nausea and vomiting in 5, leukopenia in 1, and thrombopenia in 3). None had radiation pneumonitis. The means of the summarized items were 1.9 for UHBI than 1.4 for LBHI. The means of the summarized items were 1.6 for 8 Gy and 1.8 for 6 Gy. UHBI provoked a higher incidence and intensity of nausea and vomiting and LHBI caused a higher incidence and intensity of diarrhea. The remaining evaluated symptoms of toxicity were similar for irradiations of both halves of the body. Conclusions: From these results one can conclude that single-dose (6-8 Gy) HBI is a safe treatment, causing a low percentage of low-level, patient-acceptable adverse radiation sequels.
引用
收藏
页码:CR319 / CR324
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] HALF-BODY IRRADIATION
    BARTELINK, GMM
    BATTERMANN, JJ
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1979, 52 (616): : 345 - 345
  • [2] SEQUENTIAL HALF-BODY IRRADIATION IN CHILDHOOD
    JENKIN, RDT
    BERRY, MP
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1983, 9 (12): : 1969 - 1971
  • [3] HALF-BODY IRRADIATION FOR PAIN RELIEF
    PENE, F
    SCHLIENGER, M
    SCHMITT, T
    IZRAEL, V
    KINAY, M
    AGET, H
    LAUGIER, A
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER & CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1981, 17 (07): : 753 - 758
  • [4] Half-body irradiation in multiple myeloma
    Jacobs, P
    Johnson, C
    leRoux, I
    SOUTH AFRICAN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1995, 85 (12): : 1308 - 1308
  • [5] HALF-BODY IRRADIATION IN THE TREATMENT OF METASTATIC PROSTATIC-CARCINOMA
    ROWLAND, CG
    BULLIMORE, JA
    SMITH, PJB
    ROBERTS, JBM
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1981, 53 (06): : 628 - 629
  • [6] HALF-BODY IRRADIATION FOR TREATMENT OF WIDELY METASTATIC ADENOCARCINOMA OF THE PROSTATE
    KUBAN, DA
    DELBRIDGE, T
    ELMAHDI, AM
    SCHELLHAMMER, PF
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1989, 141 (03): : 572 - 574
  • [7] SEQUENTIAL HALF-BODY IRRADIATION AS SYSTEMIC TREATMENT OF PROGRESSIVE EWING SARCOMA
    LOMBARDI, F
    LATTUADA, A
    GASPARINI, M
    GIANNI, C
    MARCHESINI, R
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1982, 8 (10): : 1679 - 1682
  • [8] PLACE OF DOUBLE HALF-BODY IRRADIATION IN THE TREATMENT OF MULTIPLE-MYELOMA
    TROUSSARD, X
    LEPORRIER, M
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1991, 9 (12) : 2233 - 2234
  • [9] HALF-BODY IRRADIATION IN MULTIPLE-MYELOMA
    TOBIAS, JS
    ROWELL, NP
    RICHARDS, JDM
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1991, 9 (04) : 705 - 705
  • [10] Half-body irradiation in the treatment of multiple myeloma: A report of nine cases
    Plesnicar, A
    Jereb, B
    ZaletelKragelj, L
    TUMORI, 1996, 82 (06) : 588 - 591