Ambidextrous Leadership and Employees' Self-Reported Innovative Performance: The Role of Exploration and Exploitation Behaviors

被引:139
作者
Zacher, Hannes [1 ]
Robinson, Alecia J. [2 ]
Rosing, Kathrin [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Groningen, NL-9712 TS Groningen, Netherlands
[2] Univ Queensland, Brisbane, Qld 4072, Australia
[3] Univ Kassel, Kassel, Germany
关键词
ambidexterity; ambidextrous leadership; exploration; exploitation; innovation; TRANSFORMATIONAL LEADERSHIP; ORGANIZATIONAL AMBIDEXTERITY; NEGATIVE AFFECT; MEDIATING ROLE; METHOD BIAS; CREATIVITY; WORK; ANTECEDENTS; COMPLEXITY; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1002/jocb.66
中图分类号
G44 [教育心理学];
学科分类号
0402 ; 040202 ;
摘要
The ambidexterity theory of leadership for innovation proposes that leaders' opening and closing behaviors positively predict employees' exploration and exploitation behaviors, respectively. The interaction of exploration and exploitation behaviors, in turn, is assumed to influence employee innovative performance, such that innovative performance is highest when both exploration and exploitation behaviors are high. The goal of this study was to provide the first empirical test of these hypotheses at the individual employee level. Results based on self-report data provided by 388 employees were consistent with ambidexterity theory, even after controlling for employee reports of their leaders' transformational and transactional leadership behaviors as well as employees' openness to experience, conscientiousness, and positive affect. The findings extend previous research on ambidexterity at the team and organizational levels and suggest a possible way for leaders to enhance employee self-reported innovative performance.
引用
收藏
页码:24 / 46
页数:23
相关论文
共 77 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1985, Leadership and performance beyond expectations
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2004, MLQ MULTIFACTOR LEAD
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2006, LEADERSHIP ORG
[4]   Engaging the aging workforce: The relationship between perceived age similarity, satisfaction with coworkers, and employee engagement [J].
Avery, Derek R. ;
McKay, Patrick F. ;
Wilson, David C. .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2007, 92 (06) :1542-1556
[5]   Re-examining the components of transformational and transactional leadership using the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire [J].
Avolio, BJ ;
Bass, BM ;
Jung, DI .
JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL AND ORGANIZATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1999, 72 :441-462
[6]   Leadership: Current Theories, Research, and Future Directions [J].
Avolio, Bruce J. ;
Walumbwa, Fred O. ;
Weber, Todd J. .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2009, 60 :421-449
[7]   A Meta-Analysis of 25 Years of Mood-Creativity Research: Hedonic Tone, Activation, or Regulatory Focus? [J].
Baas, Matthijs ;
De Dreu, Carsten K. W. ;
Nijstad, Bernard A. .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 2008, 134 (06) :779-806
[8]   Exploitation, exploration, and process management: The productivity dilemma revisited [J].
Benner, MJ ;
Tushman, ML .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2003, 28 (02) :238-256
[9]   A Dialectic Perspective on Innovation: Conflicting Demands, Multiple Pathways, and Ambidexterity [J].
Bledow, Ronald ;
Frese, Michael ;
Anderson, Neil ;
Erez, Miriam ;
Farr, James .
INDUSTRIAL AND ORGANIZATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY-PERSPECTIVES ON SCIENCE AND PRACTICE, 2009, 2 (03) :305-337
[10]  
Bono JE, 2003, ACAD MANAGE J, V46, P554, DOI [10.2307/30040649, 10.5465/30040649]