The Impact of Corporate Sustainability on Organizational Processes and Performance

被引:1530
作者
Eccles, Robert G. [1 ]
Ioannou, Ioannis [2 ]
Serafeim, George [1 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Univ, Sch Business, Boston, MA 02163 USA
[2] London Business Sch, Strategy & Entrepreneurship Area, London NW1 4SA, England
关键词
organizational studies; strategy; effectiveness performance; behavior; sustainability; SOCIAL-RESPONSIBILITY; STAKEHOLDER THEORY; CHARITABLE CONTRIBUTIONS; MANAGEMENT; ASSOCIATIONS; CAPABILITIES; STRATEGY; ISSUES;
D O I
10.1287/mnsc.2014.1984
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
We investigate the effect of corporate sustainability on organizational processes and performance. Using a matched sample of 180 U. S. companies, we find that corporations that voluntarily adopted sustainability policies by 1993-termed as high sustainability companies-exhibit by 2009 distinct organizational processes compared to a matched sample of companies that adopted almost none of these policies-termed as low sustainability companies. The boards of directors of high sustainability companies are more likely to be formally responsible for sustainability, and top executive compensation incentives are more likely to be a function of sustainability metrics. High sustainability companies are more likely to have established processes for stakeholder engagement, to be more long-term oriented, and to exhibit higher measurement and disclosure of nonfinancial information. Finally, high sustainability companies significantly outperform their counterparts over the long term, both in terms of stock market and accounting performance.
引用
收藏
页码:2835 / 2857
页数:23
相关论文
共 63 条
[1]   What We Know and Don't Know About Corporate Social Responsibility: A Review and Research Agenda [J].
Aguinis, Herman ;
Glavas, Ante .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2012, 38 (04) :932-968
[2]  
Balotti RF, 1999, BUS LAWYER, V54, P965
[3]   Stakeholder influence capacity and the variability of financial returns to corporate social responsibility [J].
Barnett, Michael L. .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2007, 32 (03) :794-816
[4]   Managerial power and rent extraction in the design of executive compensation [J].
Bebchuk, LA ;
Fried, JM ;
Walker, DI .
UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO LAW REVIEW, 2002, 69 (03) :751-846
[5]   Corporate associations and consumer product responses: The moderating role of corporate brand dominance [J].
Berens, G ;
van Riel, CBM ;
van Bruggen, GH .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING, 2005, 69 (03) :35-48
[6]   Does stakeholder orientation matter? The relationship between stakeholder management models and firm financial performance [J].
Berman, SL ;
Wicks, AC ;
Kotha, S ;
Jones, TM .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 1999, 42 (05) :488-506
[7]   Doing better at dong good: When, why, and how consumers respond to corporate social initiatives [J].
Bhattacharya, CB ;
Sen, S .
CALIFORNIA MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2004, 47 (01) :9-+
[8]   A team production theory of corporate law [J].
Blair, MM ;
Stout, LA .
VIRGINIA LAW REVIEW, 1999, 85 (02) :247-328
[9]  
Brochet F, 2014, 12072 HBS ACC MAN UN
[10]  
Brown T.J., 1998, Corporate Reputation Review, V1, P215