Clinically Useful Diagnostic Tool of Contrast Enhanced Ultrasonography for Focal Liver Masses: Comparison to Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging

被引:29
|
作者
Ryu, Sung Woo [1 ]
Bok, Gene Hyun [1 ]
Jang, Jae Young [1 ]
Jeong, Soung Won [1 ]
Ham, Nam Seok [1 ]
Kim, Ji Hye [1 ]
Park, Eui Ju [1 ]
Kim, Jin Nyoung [1 ]
Lee, Woong Cheul [1 ]
Shim, Kwang Yeun [1 ]
Lee, Sae Hwan [1 ]
Kim, Sang Gyune [1 ]
Cha, Sang-Woo [1 ]
Kim, Young Seok [1 ]
Cho, Young Deok [1 ]
Kim, Hong Soo [1 ]
Kim, Boo Sung [1 ]
机构
[1] Soonchunhyang Univ, Soonchunhyang Univ Hosp, Coll Med, Ctr Digest Dis,Inst Digest Res,Dept Internal Med, Seoul 140743, South Korea
关键词
Contrast enhanced ultrasonography; Liver masses; HEPATOCELLULAR-CARCINOMA; ULTRASOUND; LESIONS; SONOGRAPHY; CT; BENIGN;
D O I
10.5009/gnl.2014.8.3.292
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background/Aims: To evaluate the diagnostic value of contrast (SonoVue) enhancement ultrasonography (CEUS) and to compare this method with computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in evaluating liver masses. Methods: CEUS (n=50), CT (n=47), and MRI (n=43) were performed on 50 liver masses in 48 patients for baseline mass characterization. The most likely impression for each modality and the final diagnosis, based on the combined biopsy results (n=14), angiography findings (n=36), and clinical course, were determined. The diagnostic value of CEUS was compared to those of CT and MRI. Results: The final diagnosis of the masses was hepatocellular carcinoma (n=43), hemangioma (n=3), benign adenoma (n=2), eosinophilic abscess (n=1), and liver metastasis (n=1). The overall diagnostic agreement with the final diagnosis was substantial for CEUS, CT, and MRI, with K values of 0.621, 0.763, and 0.784, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 83.3%, 87.5%, and 84.0%, respectively, for CEUS; 95.0%, 87.5%, and 93.8%, respectively, for CT; and 94.6%, 83.3%, and 93.0%, respectively for MRI. After excluding the lesions with poor acoustic sonographic windows, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for CEUS were 94.6%, 87.5%, and 93.3%, respectively, with a K value of 0.765. Conclusions: If an appropriate acoustic window is available, CEUS is comparable to CT and MRI for the diagnosis of liver masses.
引用
收藏
页码:292 / 297
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Characterization of Focal Liver Masses A Multicenter Comparison of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound, Computed Tomography, and Magnetic Resonance Imaging
    Burrowes, David P.
    Medellin, Alexandra
    Harris, Allison C.
    Milot, Laurent
    Lethebe, Brendan C.
    Wilson, Stephanie R.
    JOURNAL OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE, 2021, 40 (12) : 2581 - 2593
  • [2] The role of ultrasonography in the detection of adrenal masses: Comparison with computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging
    Suzuki Y.
    Sasagawa I.
    Suzuki H.
    Izumi T.
    Kaneko H.
    Nakada T.
    International Urology and Nephrology, 2001, 32 (3) : 303 - 306
  • [3] DIAGNOSTIC VALUE OF CONTRAST-ENHANCED ULTRASOUND, COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY AND MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING FOR FOCAL LIVER LESIONS: A META-ANALYSIS
    Xie, Limei
    Guang, Yang
    Ding, Hailong
    Cai, Ailu
    Huang, Ying
    ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2011, 37 (06): : 854 - 861
  • [4] Comparative diagnostic value of computed tomography and contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in diagnosis of focal liver lesions
    Zviniene, Kristina
    Zaboriene, Inga
    Basevicius, Algidas
    Pundzius, Juozas
    MEDICINA-LITHUANIA, 2009, 45 (10): : 751 - 763
  • [5] Comparative diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging in diagnosis of hepatic hemangiomas
    Zviniene, Kristina
    Zaboriene, Inga
    Basevicius, Algidas
    Jurkiene, Nemira
    Barauskas, Giedrius
    Pundzius, Juozas
    MEDICINA-LITHUANIA, 2010, 46 (05): : 329 - 335
  • [6] Diagnostic confidence of computed tomography and magnetic resonance in focal liver pathology
    Saba, Luca
    di Martino, Michele
    de Cecco, Carlo N.
    Catalano, Carlo
    Piga, Mario
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY, 2015, 27 (01) : 97 - 101
  • [7] Comparison of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography with grey-scale ultrasonography and contrast-enhanced computed tomography in diagnosing focal fatty liver infiltrations and focal fatty sparing
    Janica, J.
    Ustymowicz, A.
    Lukasiewicz, A.
    Panasiuk, A.
    Niemcunowicz-Janica, A.
    Turecka-Kulesza, E.
    Lebkowska, U.
    ADVANCES IN MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2013, 58 (02): : 408 - 418
  • [8] Diagnosis of focal liver masses on ultrasonography - Comparison of unenhanced and contrast-enhanced scans
    Wilson, Stephanie R.
    Jang, Hyun-Jung
    Kim, Tae Kyoung
    Burns, Peter N.
    JOURNAL OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE, 2007, 26 (06) : 775 - 787
  • [9] Comparison of the Diagnostic Performance of Contrast-enhanced Ultrasound with That of Contrast-enhanced Computed Tomography and Contrast-enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Evaluation of Renal Masses: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Furrer, Marc A.
    Spycher, Samuel C. J.
    Buettiker, Sophia M.
    Gross, Tobias
    Bosshard, Piet
    Thalmann, George N.
    Schneider, Marc P.
    Roth, Beat
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY ONCOLOGY, 2020, 3 (04): : 464 - 473
  • [10] Diagnostic value of magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography for oral masses in dogs
    Kafka, UCM
    Carstens, A
    Steenkamp, G
    Symington, H
    JOURNAL OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN VETERINARY ASSOCIATION, 2004, 75 (04) : 163 - 168