Empirical treatment followed by a test-and-treat strategy is more cost-effective in comparison with prompt endoscopy or radiography in patients with dyspeptic symptoms: a randomized trial in a primary care setting

被引:6
|
作者
Laheij, RJF
Hermsen, JT
Jansen, JBMJ
Horrevorts, AM
Rongen, RJ
van Rossum, LGM
Witteman, E
de Koning, RW
机构
[1] Radboud Univ Nijmegen Med Ctr, Dept Gastroenterol, NL-6500 HB Nijmegen, Netherlands
[2] Canisius Wilhelmina Hosp, Med Diagnost Ctr, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[3] Canisius Wilhelmina Hosp, Dept Microbiol, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[4] Canisius Wilhelmina Hosp, Dept Radiol, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[5] Canisius Wilhelmina Hosp, Dept Internal Med, Nijmegen, Netherlands
关键词
dyspepsia; endoscopy; radiography; randomized controlled trial; treat-and-test;
D O I
10.1093/fampra/cmh304
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Objective. Management of patients with dyspepsia remains controversial. No consensus has yet been reached concerning diagnostic and medical strategies. We conducted a randomized trial to assess the effectiveness of three management strategies for patients with uninvestigated persistent dyspeptic symptoms. Methods. A total of 199 patients presenting in primary care with dyspeptic symptoms (age 18-65 years, no alarming symptoms) were randomized to either empirical treatment with omeprazole and, in the case of symptomatic relapse, serological Helicobacter pylori infection testing plus eradication therapy (treat-and-test group), prompt upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (endoscopy group) or prompt upper gastrointestinal radiography (radiography group) followed by directed medical treatment. Symptoms, patients' satisfaction and use of resources were recorded during 6 months of follow-up. Results. Sixty-nine patients were assigned to the treat-and-test group, 64 to the radiography group and 66 to the endoscopy group. The median age was 44 years; 104 patients were male and 37% were H.pylori infected. A total of 170 patients (85%) returned the 6 months questionnaire. The numbers of patients with complete symptom relief in the treat-and-test group, endoscopy group and radiography group were 21, 16 and 15, respectively, at 3 months (P = 0.59), and 23, 13 and 12, respectively, at 6 months (P = 0.05). Twenty-two patients in the treat-and-test group underwent endoscopy or radiography. Two patients in the endoscopy group and four patients in the radiography group underwent more than one diagnostic test. The average medical cost per patient for the treat-and-test group was e276, for the endoscopy group e426 and for the radiography group e321, respectively. Conclusion. Empirical treatment followed by a test-and-eradicate strategy resulted in fewer diagnostic tests, more symptom relief and lower medical costs compared with prompt upper gastrointestinal radiography or endoscopy in the management of uninvestigated patients with persistent dyspeptic symptoms.
引用
收藏
页码:238 / 243
页数:6
相关论文
共 9 条
  • [1] Empirical treatment followed by a test and treat strategy versus prompt endoscopy or radiography in patients with dyspeptic symptoms. A randomized trial in primary care setting
    Laheij, RJF
    Hermsen, JT
    Horrevorts, AM
    Rongen, RJ
    Witteman, E
    Rossum, LGM
    Jansen, JBMJ
    De Koning, RW
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2001, 120 (05) : A88 - A88
  • [2] Approach to treatment of dyspepsia in primary care -: A randomized trial comparing "Test-and-treat" with prompt endoscopy
    Arents, NLA
    Thijs, JC
    van Zwet, AA
    Pool, MO
    Götz, JM
    van de Werf, GT
    Reenders, K
    Sluiter, WJ
    Kleibeuker, JH
    ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2003, 163 (13) : 1606 - 1612
  • [3] Economic evaluation of a randomized trial comparing Helicobacter pylori test-and-treat and prompt endoscopy strategies for managing dyspepsia in a primary-care setting
    Klok, RM
    Arents, NLA
    de Vries, R
    Thijs, JC
    Brouwers, JRBJ
    Kleibeuker, JH
    Postma, MJ
    CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2005, 27 (10) : 1647 - 1657
  • [4] The economic evaluation of a randomized trial comparing "test-and-treat" with prompt endoscopy in primary care; The health economics of the sense-study
    Klok, RM
    Arents, NL
    De Vries, R
    Thijs, JC
    Brouwers, JR
    Kleibeuker, JH
    Postma, MJ
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2004, 7 (06) : 754 - 754
  • [5] What is the most cost-effective strategy when managing young dyspeptic patients in the primary care setting?
    Makris, N
    Barkun, AN
    Fallone, CA
    Crott, R
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1999, 116 (04) : A120 - A120
  • [6] Comparison between empirical prokinetics, Helicobacter test-and-treat and empirical endoscopy in primary-care patients presenting with dyspepsia: A one-year study
    Wayne HC Hu
    SK Lam
    Cindy LK Lam
    WM Wong
    KF Lam
    YH Wong
    Benjamin CY Wong
    Annie OO Chan
    CK Chan
    Gabriel M Leung
    World Journal of Gastroenterology, 2006, (31) : 5010 - 5016
  • [7] H-pylori "test and treat" or prompt endoscopy for dyspeptic patients in primary care.: A randomized controlled trial of two management strategies:: One year follow-up.
    Lassen, AT
    Pedersen, FM
    Bytzer, P
    de Muckadell, OBS
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1998, 114 (04) : A196 - A196
  • [8] Helicobacter pylori test-and-eradicate vs. prompt endoscopy for management of dyspeptic patients in primary care:: 6.7 years follow-up of a randomized trial
    Lassen, AT
    Hallas, J
    de Muckadell, OBS
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2004, 126 (04) : A83 - A83
  • [9] APP-BASED TREATMENT FOR FEMALE URINARY INCONTINENCE AS EFFECTIVE AND COST-EFFECTIVE IN COMPARISON TO CARE AS USUAL IN PRIMARY CARE: A PRAGMATIC RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL.
    Loohuis, A.
    van der Worp
    Wessels, N.
    Dekker, J.
    Slieker-Ten Hove, M.
    Berger, M.
    Vermeulen, K.
    Blanker, M.
    NEUROUROLOGY AND URODYNAMICS, 2020, 39 : S366 - S367