Evaluating the labour productivity of social enterprises in comparison to SMEs in Australia

被引:4
|
作者
Abbott, Malcolm [1 ]
Barraket, Jo [2 ]
Castellas, Erin I-Ping [2 ]
Hiruy, Kiros [1 ]
Suchowerska, Roksolana [1 ]
Ward-Christie, Libby [1 ]
机构
[1] Swinburne Univ Technol, Hawthorn, Vic, Australia
[2] Swinburne Univ Technol, Ctr Social Impact, Hawthorn, Vic, Australia
关键词
SMEs; Social economy; Profitability; Social enterprises; 3RD SECTOR; POLICY;
D O I
10.1108/SEJ-09-2018-0064
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Purpose The social economy - including not-for-profits, cooperatives, mutual organisations and social enterprises - is playing a stronger role than ever in the delivery of public policy. Yet, these organisations are often anecdotally viewed as relatively inefficient providers. The purpose of this paper is to compare the profitability and labour productivity of social enterprises in the State of Victoria in Australia with that of small- and medium-sized business enterprises (SMEs) in the same state. This paper found that, although social enterprises generally generated smaller profits and, therefore, could be less profitable, their relative level of labour productivity (value added and income to labour employed) was comparable or higher than that of SMEs. This paper responds to the need for comparative insights about social enterprise performance and considers the implications of these findings for new public governance. Design/methodology/approach The social economy - including not-for-profits, cooperatives, mutual organisations and social enterprises - is playing a stronger role than ever in the delivery of public policy. Yet these organisations are often anecdotally viewed as relatively inefficient providers. Findings This paper found that, although social enterprises generally generated smaller profits and, therefore, could be less profitable, their relative level of labour productivity (value added and income to labour employed) was comparable or higher than that of SMEs. This paper responds to the need for comparative insights about social enterprise performance and considers the implications of these findings for new public governance. Originality/value This is the first work that has been done of this sort that has looked specifically at Australia circumstances.
引用
收藏
页码:179 / 194
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Labour Productivity at Russian Enterprises Revisited
    Vnutskikh, Alexander
    Pishchalnikov, Dmitriy
    Sokruta, Lidia
    Rudnova, Natalia
    Tolochek, Vladimir
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SOCIAL SCIENCE, PUBLIC HEALTH AND EDUCATION (SSPHE 2018), 2018, 196 : 258 - 260
  • [2] Labour productivity and employment in Australian manufacturing SMEs
    Mahmood M.
    International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 2008, 4 (1) : 51 - 62
  • [3] Labour Productivity and Competitiveness of SMEs in Food Industry
    Volek, Tomas
    Novotna, Martina
    Zeman, Radek
    HRADEC ECONOMIC DAYS, PT II, 2019, 2019, 9 : 501 - 508
  • [4] Factors Affecting Labour Productivity in Manufacturing Enterprises
    Golas, Zbigniew
    CONTEMPORARY ECONOMICS, 2010, 4 (02) : 75 - 87
  • [5] Labour Productivity in State-Owned Enterprises
    Afonso, Antonio
    Guedes, Maria Joao
    Patel, Pankaj C.
    COMPARATIVE ECONOMIC STUDIES, 2021, 63 (03) : 450 - 465
  • [6] Labour Productivity in State-Owned Enterprises
    António Afonso
    Maria João Guedes
    Pankaj C. Patel
    Comparative Economic Studies, 2021, 63 : 450 - 465
  • [7] Construction SMEs labour productivity: causal layered analysis
    Adebowale, Oluseyi Julius
    Agumba, Justus Ngala
    JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING DESIGN AND TECHNOLOGY, 2025, 23 (02) : 501 - 524
  • [8] COMPANIES GROWTH AND LABOUR PRODUCTIVITY IN SMEs: EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE
    Serrasqueiro, Z.
    Nunes, P. M.
    Leitao, J.
    ACTUAL PROBLEMS OF ECONOMICS, 2009, (92): : 229 - 240
  • [9] PRODUCTIVITY OF LABOUR IN AGRICULTURAL ENTERPRISES IN SELECTED EU COUNTRIES
    Jarka, Slawomir
    SCIENTIFIC PAPERS-SERIES MANAGEMENT ECONOMIC ENGINEERING IN AGRICULTURE AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT, 2016, 16 (04) : 185 - 189