Environmental risk assessment for new human pharmaceuticals in the European Union according to the draft guideline/discussion paper of January 2001

被引:37
|
作者
Straub, JO [1 ]
机构
[1] F Hoffmann La Roche & Co Ltd, CSE, Corp Safety & Environm Protect, EurProBiol CBiol MIBiol, CH-4070 Basel, Switzerland
关键词
pharmaceuticals; environmental risk assessment; European Union; tiered assessment; Draft Guideline 2001;
D O I
10.1016/S0378-4274(02)00049-8
中图分类号
R99 [毒物学(毒理学)];
学科分类号
100405 ;
摘要
Since 1993, an environmental risk assessment (ERA) for a new drug application has been Stipulated by EU Directive 93/39/EEC amending Directive 65/65/EEC. In early 2001, after several unpublished draft versions for an ERA guideline, a draft guideline/discussion paper for an ERA for non-GMO-containing drugs was published by the European Medicines Evaluation Agency (EMEA). The draft guideline describes a step-wise. tiered procedure for the ERA. The first tier consists of deriving a crude predicted environmental concentration (PEC) in the aquatic compartment for the active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) or its major metabolites, based on predicted amounts used and specific removal rates in sewage treatment or surface waters. If this crude PEC is <0.01 mug/l and no environmental concerns are apparent, no further assessment is deemed necessary. Else, in the second tier, a crude predicted no-effect level (PNEC) for the aquatic compartment is to be extrapolated by dividing the lowest 50%-effect concentration from acute ecotoxicity tests with algae, daphnia or fish (EC50, LC50) by an assessment factor (usually 1000). If the ratio PEC/PNEC is < 1, no further assessment is deemed necessary. Lastly, in the third tier, further considerations on a case-by-case basis are needed. This may encompass refining the environmental fate information and thereby the PEC, considering further environmental compartments and their respective PECs (up to and including field studies), but also refining the PNEC. While the ERA addresses mainly the API, excipients of the formulated drug should be considered as well. In the case of medicinal products, the benefit for patients has relative precedence over environmental risks, meaning that even in the case of an unacceptable residual risk for new drugs after third-tier considerations, prohibition of a new API is not taken into consideration. Instead, possible mitigating or precautionary safety measures may consist of specific product labelling (i.e. package leaflets for the patients regarding returning and proper disposal of unused medicines), restricted use through in-hospital or in-surgery administration under supervision only, or the recommendation of environmental analytical monitoring up to ecological field studies. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:137 / 143
页数:7
相关论文
共 9 条
  • [1] Environmental risk assessment for new human pharmaceuticals in the European Union according to the draft guideline/discussion paper of January 2001 (vol 131, pg 137, 2002)
    Straub, JO
    TOXICOLOGY LETTERS, 2002, 135 (03) : 229 - +
  • [2] Effective Waiver Strategies for Environmental Risk Assessment of Pharmaceuticals in the European Union
    Crawley, Francis E. H.
    Mayfield, David B.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TOXICOLOGY, 2023, 42 (01) : 75 - 75
  • [3] Commentary on the draft revised guideline on the environmental risk assessment of medicinal products for human use
    Whomsley, Rhys
    Brendler-Schwaab, Susanne
    Griffin, Eadaoin
    Jensen, John
    Moermond, Caroline
    Scholz, Birger
    Nilssen, Laila Sortvik
    Stemplewski, Henry
    Roennefahrt, Ines
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES EUROPE, 2019, 31 (1)
  • [4] Commentary on the draft revised guideline on the environmental risk assessment of medicinal products for human use
    Rhys Whomsley
    Susanne Brendler-Schwaab
    Eadaoin Griffin
    John Jensen
    Caroline Moermond
    Birger Scholz
    Laila Sortvik Nilssen
    Henry Stemplewski
    Ines Roennefahrt
    Environmental Sciences Europe, 2019, 31
  • [5] Environmental risk assessment of medicinal products for human use according to European commission recommendations
    Huschek, G
    Hansen, PD
    Maurer, HH
    Krengel, D
    Kayser, A
    ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGY, 2004, 19 (03) : 226 - 240
  • [6] Improving the regulatory environmental risk assessment of human pharmaceuticals: Required changes in the new legislation
    Gildemeister, Daniela
    Moermond, Caroline T. A.
    Berg, Cecilia
    Bergstrom, Ulrika
    Bielska, Lucie
    Evandri, Maria Grazia
    Franceschin, Marco
    Kolar, Boris
    Montforts, Mark H. M. M.
    Vaculik, Christine
    REGULATORY TOXICOLOGY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 2023, 142
  • [7] What impact will EPPO's new resistance risk assessment guideline have on selection pressure in the European Union?
    Leonard, PK
    Dutton, R
    PEST MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2002, 58 (09) : 939 - 943
  • [8] Critical discussion of the current environmental risk assessment (ERA) of veterinary medicinal products (VMPs) in the European Union, considering changes in animal husbandry
    Haupt, Ruth
    Heinemann, Celine
    Hayer, Jason Jeremia
    Schmid, Simone Magdalene
    Guse, Miriam
    Bleeser, Ramona
    Steinhoff-Wagner, Julia
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES EUROPE, 2021, 33 (01)
  • [9] Critical discussion of the current environmental risk assessment (ERA) of veterinary medicinal products (VMPs) in the European Union, considering changes in animal husbandry
    Ruth Haupt
    Céline Heinemann
    Jason Jeremia Hayer
    Simone Magdalene Schmid
    Miriam Guse
    Ramona Bleeser
    Julia Steinhoff-Wagner
    Environmental Sciences Europe, 2021, 33