Scaffolding student learning: A micro-analysis of teacher-student interaction

被引:53
|
作者
van de Pol, Janneke [1 ]
Elbers, Ed [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Utrecht, Fac Social & Behav Sci, NL-3508 TC Utrecht, Netherlands
关键词
Scaffolding; Contingent support; Challenge; Regulating learning; Small-group work; MATHEMATICS; JUDGMENTS; CONTEXT; 4TH;
D O I
10.1016/j.lcsi.2012.12.001
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Teacher scaffolding and more specifically, support that is adapted to or contingent upon a student's understanding, is considered effective in promoting student learning. Increasing control upon a student's failures, decreasing control upon a student's successes and keeping the degree of control the same in the case of partial student understanding are considered contingent support which provides an appropriate level of challenge. However, these theoretical premises have not yet been tested in classroom situations. The main goal of this study was to investigate different patterns of contingency and to explore how contingency affects student learning. Twenty-two pre-vocational teachers' lessons were analysed regarding contingency and student learning, using micro-analysis. The results show that: (1) if the initial student understanding is poor, contingent support results in increased student understanding, and (2) teachers seldom underestimated students' understanding but often overestimated students' understanding. Contingent support can be effective and future research should focus on facilitating teachers in learning how to correctly diagnose students' understanding. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:32 / 41
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Scaffolding in Teacher-Student Interaction: A Decade of Research
    van de Pol, Janneke
    Volman, Monique
    Beishuizen, Jos
    EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2010, 22 (03) : 271 - 296
  • [2] TEACHER-STUDENT INTERACTION
    GUTHRIE, JT
    READING TEACHER, 1979, 33 (03): : 372 - 374
  • [4] Student Knowledge Prediction for Teacher-Student Interaction
    Kim, Seonghun
    Kim, Woojin
    Jang, Yeonju
    Choi, Seongyune
    Jung, Heeseok
    Kim, Hyeoncheol
    THIRTY-FIFTH AAAI CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, THIRTY-THIRD CONFERENCE ON INNOVATIVE APPLICATIONS OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND THE ELEVENTH SYMPOSIUM ON EDUCATIONAL ADVANCES IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2021, 35 : 15560 - 15568
  • [5] Scaffolding in teacher-student interaction: an operationalization for evaluation in educational and clinical settings
    Diaferia, Chiara
    Artoni, Vanessa
    Rollo, Dolores
    2018 IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON MEDICAL MEASUREMENTS AND APPLICATIONS (MEMEA), 2018, : 707 - 711
  • [6] Fear in teacher-student interaction
    Fabres Campos, Jorge
    REVISTA IBEROAMERICANA DE EDUCACION, 2005, 37 (01):
  • [7] TEACHER-STUDENT INTERACTION IN DISTANCE LEARNING IN EMERGENCY SITUATIONS
    Sason, Hava
    Kellerman, Avichai
    JOURNAL OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY EDUCATION-RESEARCH, 2021, 20 : 479 - 501
  • [8] Research on Teacher-Student Interaction in M-learning
    Zhang, Xiaheng
    Wang, Dan
    EDUCATIONAL SCIENCES-THEORY & PRACTICE, 2018, 18 (05): : 1598 - 1603
  • [9] Teacher-Student Interaction, Student-Student Interaction and Social Presence: Their Impacts on Learning Engagement in Online Learning Environments
    Miao, Jia
    Chang, Jiangmei
    Ma, Li
    JOURNAL OF GENETIC PSYCHOLOGY, 2022, 183 (06): : 514 - 526
  • [10] Teacher-Student Curriculum Learning
    Matiisen, Tambet
    Oliver, Avital
    Cohen, Taco
    Schulman, John
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NEURAL NETWORKS AND LEARNING SYSTEMS, 2020, 31 (09) : 3732 - 3740