Bringing ecosystem services indicators into spatial planning practice: Lessons from collaborative development of a web-based visualization platform

被引:23
|
作者
Hayek, U. Wissen [1 ]
Teich, M. [2 ]
Klein, T. M. [1 ]
Gret-Regamey, A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Planning Landscape & Urban Syst, CH-8093 Zurich, Switzerland
[2] Utah State Univ, Wildland Resources Dept, Logan, UT 84322 USA
关键词
Transdisciplinary research; Ecosystem service indicators; Assessment criteria; Process design; Co-production of spatial decision support; systems; Web-based visualization platform; TRANSDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH; LANDSCAPE VISUALIZATIONS; TOOL;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.03.035
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Considerable efforts are made to integrate ecosystem services (ES) indicators into spatial planning practice. Although a lot of decision support systems already provide helpful functionalities, they are not yet integrated into everyday decision-making, mainly because they do not readily fit into planning processes in practice. There is an increasing awareness that the development should foster collaboration between interdisciplinary researchers and the end users of the tools to secure their suitability for such planning processes. Hence, user-oriented research and experimenting is seen as the appropriate approach for getting the tools ready for practice. Guidelines for conducting such processes are yet missing. Here, we contribute to the development of such guidelines by means of a practical case study. The focus is placed on how transdisciplinary (TD) research on spatial decision support systems should be designed for the integration of ES indicators into planning practice. In a TD project, a web-based visualization platform with indicators of relevant ES was developed to support municipalities of the Canton of Zurich, Switzerland, in assigning adequate watercourse corridors according to the revised Swiss Waters Protection Act. A preliminary as well as an enhanced version of the platform prototype were demonstrated to different actors for evaluating the platform's readiness for practice. We assessed the process design and the quality of the product in a discursive manner. Thereby, we implemented a set of assessment criteria derived from literature and adapted them to the case study at hand for the analysis of empirical material (participant lists, project schedule, meeting minutes and observation protocols). Finally, we discussed the lessons learned on developing significant ES indicators and their visualization and the conclusions drawn with respect to ensuring the quality of the platform development process. The results show that conceptualizing the ES indicators in strong collaboration with practice representatives increased their relevance to the actors' needs and therefore their legitimacy. Providing interfaces for collaboratively translating practical approaches into scientific models is, thus, crucial for the development of significant indicators. Furthermore, specifying the purpose of the visualization platform in planning processes requires prototyping and iterative conceptualization, because practice actors need concrete examples to express their specific demands. This also requires that the concept of developing the ES indicators and the spatial decision support systems should be treated rather as an open working paper than as a final document agreed on in the first collaboration phase. Hence, time scheduling and occupying skilled project managers for this iterative process should be taken seriously. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:90 / 99
页数:10
相关论文
共 42 条
  • [1] Collaborative Web-Based Simulation Platform for Construction Project Planning
    Ismail, Ali
    Srewil, Yaseen
    Scherer, Raimar J.
    COLLABORATIVE SYSTEMS FOR SMART NETWORKED ENVIRONMENTS, 2014, 434 : 471 - 478
  • [2] Applications of the Web-based collaborative visualization in distributed product development
    Chu, CH
    Cheng, CY
    Wu, CW
    COMPUTERS IN INDUSTRY, 2006, 57 (03) : 272 - 282
  • [3] MarineMap: A web-based platform for collaborative marine protected area planning
    Merrifield, Matthew S.
    McClintock, Will
    Burt, Chad
    Fox, Evan
    Serpa, Paulo
    Steinback, Charles
    Gleason, Mary
    OCEAN & COASTAL MANAGEMENT, 2013, 74 : 67 - 76
  • [4] A Web-based OO platform for the development of multimedia collaborative applications
    Guerrero, LA
    Fuller, DA
    DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS, 1999, 27 (03) : 255 - 268
  • [5] Planning and Control system for web-based collaborative media product development
    Ching, CY
    Wu, HE
    Product Lifecycle Management: Emerging Solutions and Challenges for Global Networked Enterprise, 2005, : 331 - 341
  • [6] An integrated user-friendly web-based spatial platform for bioenergy planning
    Tauro, Raul
    Rangel, Roberto
    Suarez, Rodrigo
    Luis Caballero, Jose
    Anaya-Merchant, Carlos
    Salinas-Melgoza, Miguel
    Guzman, Hector
    Ghilardi, Adrian
    BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2021, 145
  • [7] Development of a Web-based visualization platform for climate research using Google Earth
    Sun, Xiaojuan
    Shen, Suhung
    Leptoukh, Gregory G.
    Wang, Panxing
    Di, Liping
    Lu, Mingyue
    COMPUTERS & GEOSCIENCES, 2012, 47 : 160 - 168
  • [8] Web-based configure-to-order platform for collaborative development of customized products
    Jiao, JX
    Helander, M
    Zhang, LF
    2005 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CYBERWORLDS, PROCEEDINGS, 2005, : 51 - 58
  • [9] Empirical study on the merit of web-based 4D visualization in collaborative construction planning and scheduling
    Kang, Julian H.
    Anderson, Stuart D.
    Clayton, Mark J.
    JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT, 2007, 133 (06) : 447 - 461
  • [10] The web-based manufacturing resource sharing technologies and application services in collaborative product development
    Dong, Baoli
    Wei, Xiuting
    Qi, Guoning
    Qian, Yadong
    Gu, Xinjian
    Jiao, Xuejian
    Ma, Jun
    2006 10TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER SUPPORTED COOPERATIVE WORK IN DESIGN, PROCEEDINGS, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2006, : 683 - 688