A comparison of risk assessment of single and combination manual handling tasks .1. Maximum acceptable weight measures

被引:19
|
作者
Straker, LM [1 ]
Stevenson, MG [1 ]
Twomey, LT [1 ]
机构
[1] WORKSAFE AUSTRALIA, SYDNEY, NSW 2001, AUSTRALIA
关键词
manual handling; evaluation methodology; psychophysics;
D O I
10.1080/00140139608964439
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Many manual handling activities involve combinations of pull, lift, carry, lower and push, yet few studies have investigated how to assess the risk of such combination tasks. Most recommendations assume that a combination task can be split into its components for assessment. The aim of this study was to compare the risks assessed in single manual handling tasks with those in combination tasks. Nine male and nine female students participated in a study to determine Maximum Acceptable Weights (MAWs) in single and combination tasks at different frequencies (1 min(-1) and 3 min(-1) for combination tasks and 3 min(-1) and 6 min(-1) for single tasks) and heights (floor, knuckle, shoulder). Combination tasks consisted of one each of the single tasks (pull, lift, carry, lower and push). The MAW of each combination task was compared to the MAWs of the single tasks of which it was composed using repeated measures analysis of variance with specified contrasts. In at least one of the 12 comparisons each single task MAW was found to be different from its related combination task MAW. It was concluded that the current use of single task MAWs to estimate the risk in combination tasks was unacceptable. Prediction models for combination task MAWs based on single tasks MAWs were also developed, using step-wise regression. Although coefficients of determination of around 0.8 were achieved it was argued that owing to their situation-specific nature the prediction of combination task risk using single task MAWs was likely to result in unacceptable risk errors.
引用
收藏
页码:128 / 140
页数:13
相关论文
共 14 条
  • [1] A comparison of risk assessment of single and combination manual handling tasks .1. Maximum acceptable weight measures (vol 39, pg 128, 1996)
    Straker, LM
    Stevenson, MG
    Twomey, LT
    ERGONOMICS, 1997, 40 (06) : 656 - 656
  • [2] A comparison of risk assessment of single and combination manual handling tasks .3. Biomechanical measures
    Straker, LM
    Stevenson, MG
    Twomey, LT
    Smith, LM
    ERGONOMICS, 1997, 40 (07) : 708 - 728
  • [3] Determination of Maximum Acceptable Weight of Handling in Combined Manual Materials Handling Tasks
    Li, Kai Way
    Liu, Chih Fung
    2009 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING AND ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, VOLS 1-4, 2009, : 2039 - 2043
  • [4] A comparison of risk assessment of single and combination manual handling tasks .2. Discomfort, rating of perceived exertion and heart rate measures
    Straker, LM
    Stevenson, MG
    Twomey, LT
    ERGONOMICS, 1997, 40 (06) : 656 - 669
  • [5] Effect of Background Music on Maximum Acceptable Weight of Manual Lifting Tasks
    Yu, Ruifeng
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND ERGONOMICS, 2014, 20 (03) : 437 - 445
  • [6] THE DESIGN OF MANUAL HANDLING TASKS - REVISED TABLES OF MAXIMUM ACCEPTABLE WEIGHTS AND FORCES
    SNOOK, SH
    CIRIELLO, VM
    ERGONOMICS, 1991, 34 (09) : 1197 - 1213
  • [7] Static and Dynamic Work Activity Classification from a Single Accelerometer: Implications for Ergonomic Assessment of Manual Handling Tasks
    Hosseinian, Seyed Mohammadreza
    Zhu, Yibo
    Mehta, Ranjana K.
    Erraguntla, Madhav
    Lawley, Mark A.
    IISE TRANSACTIONS ON OCCUPATIONAL ERGONOMICS & HUMAN FACTORS, 2019, 7 (01): : 59 - 68
  • [8] Prospective validation of a low-back disorder risk model and assessment of ergonomic interventions associated with manual materials handling tasks
    Marras, WS
    Allread, WG
    Burr, DL
    Fathallah, FA
    ERGONOMICS, 2000, 43 (11) : 1866 - 1886
  • [9] Single Building Seismic Risk Assessment Including the Vertical Component: Quantitative Comparison, Intensity Measures, and Nonstructural Fragility Uncertainties
    Triantafyllou, Georgios
    Kohrangi, Mohsen
    Vamvatsikos, Dimitrios
    Bazzurro, Paolo
    EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING & STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, 2025,
  • [10] Using systems thinking-based risk assessment methods to assess hazardous manual tasks: a comparison of Net-HARMS, EAST-BL, FRAM and STPA
    McCormack, Peter
    Read, Gemma J. M.
    Hulme, Adam
    Lane, Ben R.
    McLean, Scott
    Salmon, Paul M.
    ERGONOMICS, 2023, 66 (05) : 609 - 626