Effect of design-based learning on improving computational thinking

被引:41
|
作者
Jun, SooJin [1 ]
Han, SeonKwan [2 ]
Kim, SooHwan [3 ]
机构
[1] Korea Univ, Grad Sch, Dept Comp Sci Educ, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Gyeongin Natl Univ Educ, Dept Comp Educ, Incheon, South Korea
[3] Chongshin Univ, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
Design-based learning; computational thinking; programming education; childhood education; EDUCATION; SCIENCE; GAME;
D O I
10.1080/0144929X.2016.1188415
中图分类号
TP3 [计算技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
The results of this study indicated that design-based learning (DBL) improves computational thinking (CT) in a sample of elementary school students. The experiment consisted of participants using the Scratch Program and Creative Computing Guidebook, both developed by the MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) media laboratory, for a total of 15 hours. An experimental group and a control group were formed and consisted of fourth to sixth graders. DBL was applied to the experimental group, while a traditional, direct method of teaching was applied to the control group. The experiment was designed to examine several aspects of learning: self-efficacy, self-interest, and self-CT. Moreover, we compared changes in students' perceptions of computers and analysed differences in students' responses between the two groups according to each of the steps of DBL. Then, we verified the effects of DBL by examining the progress of each group and the differences between the two groups. At the end of the experiment, we found that both groups showed enhanced self-efficacy, self-interest, and self-CT. However, the experimental group had a greater number of significant positive changes than the control group did in all areas (p < .01). In conclusion, the findings presented herein demonstrated that applying DBL is more effective for improving CT than traditional methodologies are.
引用
收藏
页码:43 / 53
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Developing Computational Thinking: Design-Based Learning and Interdisciplinary Activity Design
    Wang, Dongqing
    Luo, Liqiang
    Luo, Jing
    Lin, Sihong
    Ren, Guangjie
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2022, 12 (21):
  • [2] Effect of design-based learning on elementary students computational thinking skills in visual programming maker course
    Matere, Isaac M.
    Weng, Cathy
    Astatke, Melese
    Hsia, Chih-Hsien
    Fan, Chen-Guo
    INTERACTIVE LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS, 2023, 31 (06) : 3633 - 3646
  • [3] Assessing creative thinking in design-based learning
    Doppelt, Yaron
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY AND DESIGN EDUCATION, 2009, 19 (01) : 55 - 65
  • [4] Assessing creative thinking in design-based learning
    Yaron Doppelt
    International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 2009, 19 : 55 - 65
  • [5] A design-based pedagogical framework for developing computational thinking skills
    Gupta, Samrat
    Tiwari, Amit Anand
    JOURNAL OF DECISION SYSTEMS, 2022, 31 (04) : 433 - 450
  • [6] Developing Computational Thinking Skills of High School Students: Design-Based Learning Activities and Programming Tasks
    Mustafa Saritepeci
    The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 2020, 29 : 35 - 54
  • [7] Developing Computational Thinking Skills of High School Students: Design-Based Learning Activities and Programming Tasks
    Saritepeci, Mustafa
    ASIA-PACIFIC EDUCATION RESEARCHER, 2020, 29 (01): : 35 - 54
  • [8] Developing a Robotics Program to Support Students’ Computational Thinking: a Design-based Study
    Qijie Vicky Cai
    Huili Hong
    Scot W. McNary
    Liyan Song
    TechTrends, 2023, 67 : 965 - 976
  • [9] Developing a Robotics Program to Support Students' Computational Thinking: a Design-based Study
    Cai, Qijie Vicky
    Hong, Huili
    McNary, Scot W.
    Song, Liyan
    TECHTRENDS, 2023, 67 (06) : 965 - 976
  • [10] An Integrated Design-Based Learning Management Model to Promote Thai Undergraduate Computational Thinking Skills and Programming Proficiency
    Prommun, Phattharapol
    Kantathanawat, Thiyaporn
    Pimdee, Paitoon
    Sukkamart, Thanate
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING PEDAGOGY, 2022, 12 (01): : 75 - 94