The impact of different 18FDG PET healthy subject scans for comparison with single patient in SPM analysis

被引:14
|
作者
Gallivanone, Francesca [1 ]
Della Rosa, Pasquale A. [1 ]
Perani, Daniela [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Gilardi, Maria C. [1 ]
Castiglioni, Isabella [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Res Council IBFM CNR, Inst Mol Bioimaging & Physiol, Via Fratelli Cervi 93, I-20090 Segrate, MI, Italy
[2] Univ Vita Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
[3] Ist Sci San Raffaele, Dept Nucl Med, Milan, Italy
[4] Ist Sci San Raffaele, Div Neurosci, Milan, Italy
关键词
Alzheimer Disease; Positron-emission tomography; Fluorodeoxyglucose F18;
D O I
10.23736/S1824-4785.16.02749-7
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Statistical Parametric Mapping (SPM) has been applied for single-subject evaluation of [F-18]FDG uptake in Alzheimer Disease (AD). In a single-subject framework, the patient is compared to a dataset of [F-18]FDG PET images from healthy subjects (HS) evaluating brain metabolic abnormalities. No studies exist that assess the effects on SPM analysis of HS [F-18]FDG PET datasets acquired from different subjects and using different PET scanners including the same or different PET scanners than those used for patients. This work aims to elucidate this issue from a methodological perspective. METHODS: We considered different [F-18]FDG PET datasets, from different HS populations, acquired by different PET scanners. We applied SPM5 procedures for single-subject comparison with each of the six HS datasets in 10 probable AD patients showing the typical [F-18] FDG pattern. We also implemented the same comparison in 3 probable AD patients and in 7 patients with a clinical diagnosis of Mild Cognitive Impariment (MCI), showing subtle changes on visual inspection of [F-18]FDG distribution. RESULTS: Considering the 10 patients with the typical [F-18]FDG pattern, the results were comparable for all the SPM maps. In the 3 probable AD patients with subtle changes in [F-18]FDG distribution, no significant AD pattern emerged when a small number (< 20) of HS was used, whereas a significant AD pattern appeared when a large (> 50) HS image set was used. In the 7 considered MCI patients the use of a large (> 50) HS image set allowed to assess significant hypometabolic patterns related to a probable neurodegenerative pathology. CONCLUSIONS: The use of large HS datasets of PET scans (> 50) is recommended for single-subject SPM analysis. On condition that appropriate preprocessing steps are provided, large HS datasets can include HS images acquired with different PET systems, not including images from the same scanner of that used for patients.
引用
收藏
页码:115 / 132
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Validation of normal control database from different CT-PET scanners for SPM single-subject analysis of 18FDG PET brain images
    Della Rosa, P.
    Gallivanone, F.
    Castiglioni, I.
    Gilardi, M.
    Perani, D.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2013, 40 : S347 - S347
  • [2] Acute stress studies in rats by 18FDG PET and SPM
    Gallivanone, F.
    Di Grigoli, G.
    Salvatore, C.
    Valtorta, S.
    Gilardi, M. C.
    Moresco, R. M.
    Castiglioni, I.
    2012 IEEE NUCLEAR SCIENCE SYMPOSIUM AND MEDICAL IMAGING CONFERENCE RECORD (NSS/MIC), 2012, : 2886 - 2889
  • [3] Validation of 18F-FDG-PET Single-Subject Optimized SPM Procedure with Different PET Scanners
    Presotto, Luca
    Ballarini, Tommaso
    Caminiti, Silvia Paola
    Bettinardi, Valentino
    Gianolli, Luigi
    Perani, Daniela
    NEUROINFORMATICS, 2017, 15 (02) : 151 - 163
  • [4] Validation of 18F–FDG-PET Single-Subject Optimized SPM Procedure with Different PET Scanners
    Luca Presotto
    Tommaso Ballarini
    Silvia Paola Caminiti
    Valentino Bettinardi
    Luigi Gianolli
    Daniela Perani
    Neuroinformatics, 2017, 15 : 151 - 163
  • [5] Quantitative Assessment of Inflammatory 18FDG PET Scans for Diagnosis of Cardiac Sarcoidosis
    Poitrasson-Riviere, Alexis
    Patel, Vaiibhav
    Pieper, Justin
    Arida-Moody, Liliana
    Moody, Jonathan
    Hagio, Tomoe
    Renaud, Jennifer
    Corbett, James
    Weinberg, Richard
    Ficaro, Edward
    Murthy, Venkatesh
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2020, 61
  • [6] Meta-analysis of the additional value of integrated 18FDG PET-CT for tumor distant metastasis staging: Comparison with 18FDG PET alone and CT alone
    Gao, Guangfeng
    Gong, Biyan
    Shen, Wen
    SURGICAL ONCOLOGY-OXFORD, 2013, 22 (03): : 195 - 200
  • [7] A comparison 18FDG PET and CT in the staging of oesophageal carcinoma.
    Cook, G
    Taylor, H
    Mason, R
    Rankin, S
    Fogelman, I
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 1997, 38 (05) : 1043 - 1043
  • [8] Reconstruction parameter alteration in 18FDG PET/CT: Impact on image quality and SUVmax in the obese patient
    Ducharme, Jaylene
    Bybel, Bohdan
    Levin, Daniel
    White, Darin
    Patterson, Judy
    Goertzen, Andrew
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2011, 52
  • [9] 18F-FDG PET in localization of frontal lobe epilepsy:: Comparison of visual and SPM analysis
    Kim, YK
    Lee, DS
    Lee, SK
    Chung, CK
    Chung, JK
    Lee, MC
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2002, 43 (09) : 1167 - 1174
  • [10] Re: Incidental Detection of a Hodgkin Lymphoma on 18F-Choline PET/CT and Comparison With 18FDG PET/CT in a Patient With Prostate Cancer
    Evangelista, Laura
    Pasquale, Reccia
    CLINICAL NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2016, 41 (09) : 746 - 746