Newborn early discharge revisited: Are California newborns receiving recommended postnatal services?

被引:49
|
作者
Galbraith, AA
Egerter, SA
Marchi, KS
Chavez, G
Braveman, PA
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Robert Wood Johnson Clin Scholars Program, Hlth Sci Ctr H220, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[2] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Family & Community Med, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[3] Calif Dept Hlth Serv, Sacramento, CA USA
关键词
infant; newborn; length of stay; early discharge; home visits; postnatal care; postpartum care;
D O I
10.1542/peds.111.2.364
中图分类号
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号
100202 ;
摘要
Context. Responding to safety concerns, federal and state legislation mandated coverage of minimum postnatal stays and state legislation in California mandated coverage of follow-up after early discharge. Little is known about the postnatal services newborns are receiving. Objective. To describe rates of early discharge and of timely follow-up for early-discharged newborns. Design and Setting. Retrospective, population-based cohort study using a 1999 postpartum survey in California. Participants. A total of 2828 infants of mothers with medically low-risk singleton births. Main Outcome Measures. Rates of early discharge (less than or equal to1-night stay after vaginal delivery and less than or equal to3-night stay after cesarean section) and untimely follow-up (no home or office visit within 2 days of early discharge). Results. Overall, 49.4% of newborns were discharged early. Of these, 67.5% had untimely follow-up. The odds of early discharge were greater with lower incomes: the adjusted odds ratios (AORs) (with 95% confidence intervals) were 2.06 (1.50-2.83) for incomes less than or equal to100% of poverty, 2.20 (1.65-2.93) for incomes from 101%-200% of poverty, and 2.24 (1.63-3.08) for incomes from 201%-300% of poverty. Untimely follow-up was more likely for infants of women with incomes less than or equal to100% of poverty (AOR=1.89 [1.13-3.17]) and 201%-300% of poverty (AOR=1.78 [1.09-2.91]), Medicaid coverage (AOR=1.73 [1.20-2.47]), Latina ethnicity (AOR=1.47 [1.02-2.14]), and non-English language (AOR=1.72 [1.16-2.55]). Conclusions. Despite an apparent decline in short stays after legislation, many newborns-particularly from lower-income families-continue to be discharged early. Most newborns discharged early-particularly those with Medicaid and those from low-income, Latina, and non-English- speaking homes-do not receive recommended follow-up. The most socioeconomically vulnerable newborns are receiving fewer postnatal services.
引用
收藏
页码:364 / 371
页数:8
相关论文
共 4 条
  • [1] Newborn Hearing Screening and Follow-up: Are Children Receiving Recommended Services?
    Gaffney, Marcus
    Green, Denise R.
    Gaffney, Claudia
    PUBLIC HEALTH REPORTS, 2010, 125 (02) : 199 - 207
  • [2] Early postnatal hospital discharge: the consequences of reducing length of stay for women and newborns
    Bravo, Paulina
    Uribe, Claudia
    Contreras, Aixa
    REVISTA DA ESCOLA DE ENFERMAGEM DA USP, 2011, 45 (03) : 754 - 759
  • [3] Length of postnatal stay in healthy newborns and re-hospitalization following their early discharge
    Piyush Gupta
    Saurabh Malhotra
    Dharmendra K. Singh
    Tarun Dua
    The Indian Journal of Pediatrics, 2006, 73 (10) : 897 - 900
  • [4] Length of postnatal hospital stay in healthy newborns and re-hospitalization following early discharge
    Farhat, Rawad
    Rajab, Mariam
    NORTH AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2011, 3 (03) : 146 - 151