Modeled effects of sagebrush-steppe restoration on Greater Sage-Grouse in the interior Columbia Basin, USA

被引:33
|
作者
Wisdom, MJ
Rowland, MM
Wales, BC
Hemstrom, MA
Hann, WJ
Raphael, MG
Holthausen, RS
Gravenmier, RA
Rich, TD
机构
[1] US Forest Serv, Pacific NW Res Stn, La Grande, OR 97850 USA
[2] US Bur Land Management, La Grande, OR 97850 USA
[3] US Forest Serv, Pacific NW Res Stn, Portland, OR 97204 USA
[4] US Forest Serv, Leadville, CO 80461 USA
[5] US Forest Serv, Pacific NW Res Stn, Olympia, WA 98512 USA
[6] US Forest Serv, Forestry Sci Lab, Flagstaff, AZ 86001 USA
[7] US Bur Land Management, Portland, OR 97204 USA
[8] US Fish & Wildlife Serv, Boise, ID 83709 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1046/j.1523-1739.2002.01073.x
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Habitats of Greater Sage-Grouse (Centrocercus urophasianus) have declined across western North America, and most remaining habitats occur on lands administered by the U.S. Forest Service (FS) and U.S. Bureau of Land Management (BLM). Consequently, managers of FS-BLM lands need effective strategies to recover sagebrush (Artemisia spp.) habitats on which this species depends. In response to this need, we evaluated the potential benefits of two restoration scenarios on Greater Sage-Grouse in the interior Columbia Basin and adjacent portions of the Great Basin of the western United States. Scenario 1 assumed a 50% reduction in detrimental grazing effects (through changes in stocking rates and grazing systems) and a six-fold increase in areas treated with active restoration (e.g., prescribed burning, native seedings, wildfire suppression) compared with future management proposed by the FS-BLM. Scenario 2 assumed a 100% reduction in detrimental grazing effects and the same increase in active restoration as scenario 1. To evaluate benefits, we estimated the risk of population extirpation for sage grouse 100 years in the future under the two scenarios and compared this risk with that estimated for proposed (100-year) FS-BLM management. We used estimates of extirpation risk for historical (circa 1850-1890) and current time periods as a context for our comparison. Under historical conditions, risk of extirpation was very low on FS-BLM lands, but increased to a moderate probability under current conditions. Under proposed FS-BLM management, risk of extirpation on FS-BLM lands increased to a high probability 100 years in the future. Benefits of the two restoration scenarios, however, constrained the future risk of extirpation to a moderate probability. Our results suggest that expansive and sustained habitat restoration can maintain desired conditions and reduce future extirpation risk for sage grouse on FS-BLM lands in western North America. The continued spread of exotic plants, however, presents a formidable challenge to successful restoration and warrants substantial research and management attention.
引用
收藏
页码:1223 / 1231
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Sagebrush-steppe vegetation dynamics and restoration potential in the interior Columbia Basin, USA
    Hemstrom, MA
    Wisdom, MJ
    Hann, WJ
    Rowland, MM
    Wales, BC
    Gravenmier, RA
    CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2002, 16 (05) : 1243 - 1255
  • [2] Performance of Greater Sage-Grouse models for conservation assessment in the interior Columbia Basin, USA
    Wisdom, MJ
    Wales, BC
    Rowland, MM
    Raphael, MG
    Holthausen, RS
    Rich, TD
    Saab, VA
    CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2002, 16 (05) : 1232 - 1242
  • [3] Greater sage-grouse response to sagebrush management in Utah
    Dahlgren, David K.
    Chi, Renee
    Messmer, Terry A.
    WILDLIFE SOCIETY BULLETIN, 2006, 34 (04): : 975 - 985
  • [4] SAGEBRUSH, GREATER SAGE-GROUSE, AND THE OCCURRENCE AND IMPORTANCE OF FORBS
    Pennington, Victoria E.
    Schlaepfer, Daniel R.
    Beck, Jeffrey L.
    Bradford, John B.
    Palmquist, Kyle A.
    Lauenroth, William K.
    WESTERN NORTH AMERICAN NATURALIST, 2016, 76 (03) : 298 - 312
  • [5] Response of greater sage-grouse to sagebrush reduction treatments in Wyoming big sagebrush
    Smith, Kurt T.
    Levan, Jason R.
    Chalfoun, Anna D.
    Christiansen, Thomas J.
    Harter, Stanley R.
    Oberlie, Sue
    Beck, Jeffrey L.
    WILDLIFE MONOGRAPHS, 2023, 212 (01)
  • [6] Managing for multiple species: greater sage-grouse and sagebrush songbirds
    Timmer, Jennifer M.
    Aldridge, Cameron L.
    Fernandez-Gimenez, Maria E.
    JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT, 2019, 83 (05): : 1043 - 1056
  • [7] The abundance of Greater Sage-Grouse as a proxy for the abundance of sagebrush-associated songbirds in Wyoming, USA
    Carlisle, Jason D.
    Chalfoun, Anna D.
    AVIAN CONSERVATION AND ECOLOGY, 2020, 15 (02)
  • [8] Impact of sagebrush nutrients and monoterpenes on greater sage-grouse vital rates
    Wing, Brian R.
    Messmer, Terry A.
    HUMAN-WILDLIFE INTERACTIONS, 2016, 10 (02): : 157 - 168
  • [9] Sagebrush treatments influence annual population change for greater sage-grouse
    Smith, Kurt T.
    Beck, Jeffrey L.
    RESTORATION ECOLOGY, 2018, 26 (03) : 497 - 505
  • [10] Greater sage-grouse as an umbrella species for sagebrush-associated vertebrates
    Rowland, MM
    Wisdom, MJ
    Suring, LH
    Meinke, CW
    BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2006, 129 (03) : 323 - 335