Testing the single opt-out reminder in choice experiments: An application to fuel break management in Spain

被引：23

作者：

Varela, Elsa ^{[1
,2
,3
]}

Mahieu, Pierre-Alexandre ^{[4
]}

Giergiczny, Marek ^{[5
]}

Riera, Pere ^{[6
]}

Solino, Mario ^{[1
,2
,7
]}

机构：

[1] Univ Valladolid, CIFOR, INIA, Sustainable Forest Management Res Inst, Palencia 34004, Spain

[2] Univ Valladolid, Sch Agr Engn, Palencia 34004, Spain

[3] European Forest Inst, EFIMED, Mediterranean Reg Off, Pavello St Leopold,St Antoni M Claret 167, Barcelona 08025, Spain

[4] Univ Nantes, LEMNA, F-44322 Nantes, France

[5] Univ Warsaw, Dept Econ Sci, PL-00241 Warsaw, Poland

[6] Autonomous Univ Barcelona, Inst Ciencia & Tecnol Ambientals, Bellaterra 08193, Spain

[7] Forest Res Ctr CIFOR, Natl Inst Agr & Food Res & Technol INIA, Madrid 28040, Spain

来源：

JOURNAL OF FOREST ECONOMICS | 2014年 / 20卷 / 03期

关键词：

Cheap talk; Discrete choice experiment; Random parameters models; Scale parameters; Wildfires; Willingness to pay; WILLINGNESS-TO-PAY; CHEAP TALK; FIELD EXPERIMENT; HYPOTHETICAL BIAS; MODELS; VALUATION;

D O I：

10.1016/j.jfe.2014.05.001

中图分类号：

F [经济];

学科分类号：

02 ;

摘要：

Cheap talk (CT) scripts have been broadly tested in contingent valuation studies to mitigate the effects of hypothetical bias. However, this approach may not fully be adequate when the individual is faced with several choices such as in discrete choice experiments (DCE) because the respondent may tend to forget about the CT script. This paper tests the effects of a single opt-out reminder (SOUR) to lower the hypothetical bias in a DCE dealing with the valuation of social preferences for forest fire prevention programs in Southern Spain. Results show that the inclusion of a SOUR does not contribute sufficiently to improve the CT effect on the DCE data. (C) 2014 Department of Forest Economics, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Umea. Published by Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.

引用

页码：212 / 222

页数：11

共 12 条

[1] THE EFFECT OF INCLUDING AN OPT-OUT OPTION IN DISCRETE CHOICE EXPERIMENTS
Veldwijk, J.
Lambooij, M. S.
de Bekker-Grob, E.
Smit, H. A.
de Wit, Ga
VALUE IN HEALTH, 2013, 16 (03) : A46 - A47
[2] Can a Repeated Opt-Out Reminder mitigate hypothetical bias in discrete choice experiments? An application to consumer valuation of novel food products
Alemu, Mohammed H.
Olsen, Soren B.
EUROPEAN REVIEW OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2018, 45 (05) : 749 - 782
[3] LITERATURE REVIEW ON THE USE OF OPT-OUT IN DISCRETE CHOICE EXPERIMENTS
Ng, X.
Lu, H.
Heidenreich, S.
Tervonen, T.
VALUE IN HEALTH, 2023, 26 (06) : S330 - S331
[4] The Effect of Including an Opt-Out Option in Discrete Choice Experiments
Veldwijk, Jorien
Lambooij, Mattijs S.
de Bekker-Grob, Esther W.
Smit, Henriette A.
de Wit, G. Ardine
PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (11):
[5] Including Opt-Out Options in Discrete Choice Experiments: Issues to Consider
Danny Campbell
Seda Erdem
The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, 2019, 12 : 1 - 14
[6] Including Opt-Out Options in Discrete Choice Experiments: Issues to Consider
Campbell, Danny
Erdem, Seda
PATIENT-PATIENT CENTERED OUTCOMES RESEARCH, 2019, 12 (01): : 1 - 14
[7] Augmenting short Cheap Talk scripts with a repeated Opt-Out Reminder in Choice Experiment surveys
Ladenburg, Jacob
Olsen, Soren Boye
RESOURCE AND ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2014, 37 : 39 - 63
[8] Mitigating Cost-Vector Effects in Stated Choice Experiments Using Cheap Talk and Opt-Out Reminders
Boerger, Tobias
Glenk, Klaus
Meyerhoff, Juergen
Rehdanz, Katrin
JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL AND RESOURCE ECONOMISTS, 2025, 12 (03) : 701 - 737
[9] Nurse-led management of HIV results from emergency department opt-out testing
Pinto, Jessica
Edwards, Sarah
Barber, Tristan
Burns, Fiona
HIV MEDICINE, 2023, 24 : 73 - 74
[10] Social preferences for fuel break management programs in Spain: a choice modelling application to prevention of forest fires
Varela, Elsa
Giergiczny, Marek
Riera, Pere
Mahieu, Pierre-Alexandre
Solino, Mario
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF WILDLAND FIRE, 2014, 23 (02) : 281 - 289

← 1 2 →