Operative management versus non-operative management of rib fractures in flail chest injuries: a systematic review

被引:94
|
作者
Schuurmans, Jaap [1 ]
Goslings, J. C. [1 ]
Schepers, T. [1 ]
机构
[1] Acad Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Trauma Unit, Meibergdreef 9,POB 22660, NL-1100 DD Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
Flail chest; Surgery; Systematic review; Randomized clinical trials; Mortality; Pneumonia; SURGICAL STABILIZATION; FIXATION; TRAUMA;
D O I
10.1007/s00068-016-0721-2
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Flail chest is a life-threatening complication of severe chest trauma with a mortality rate of up to 15 %. The standard non-operative management has high comorbidities with pneumonia and often leads to extended Intensive Care Unit (ICU) stay, due to insufficient respiratory function and complications. The aim of this literature study was to investigate how operative management improves patient care for adults with flail chest. Randomized-controlled trials comparing operative management versus non-operative management of flail chest were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. PubMed, Trip Database, and Google Scholar were used for study identification. We compared operative-to-non-operative management in adult flail chest patients. Mean difference and risk ratio for mortality, pneumonia rate, duration of mechanical ventilation, duration of ICU stay, duration of hospital stay, tracheostomy rate, and treatment costs were calculated by pooling these publication results. Three randomized-controlled trials were included in this systematic review. In total, there were 61 patients receiving operative management compared to 62 patients in the non-operative management group. A positive effect of surgical rib fracture fixation was observed for pneumonia rate [ES 0.5, 95 % CI (0.3, 0.7)], duration of mechanical ventilation (DMV) [ES -6.5 days 95 % CI (-11.9, -1.2)], duration of ICU stay [ES -5.2 days 95 % CI (-6.2, -4.2)], duration of hospital stay (DHS) [ES -11.4 days 95 % CI (-12.4, -10.4)], tracheostomy rate (TRCH) [ES 0.4, 95 % CI (0.2, 0.7)], and treatment costs (saving $9.968,00-14.443,00 per patient). No significant difference was noted in mortality rate [ES 0.6, 95 % CI (0.1, 2.4)] between the two treatment strategies. Despite the relatively small number of patients included, different methodologies and differences in presentation of outcomes, operative management of flail chest seems to be a promising treatment strategy that improves patients' outcomes in various ways. However, the effect on mortality rate remains inconclusive. Therefore, research should continue to explore operative management as a viable method for flail chest injuries.
引用
收藏
页码:163 / 168
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Operative management versus non-operative management of rib fractures in flail chest injuries: a systematic review
    Jaap Schuurmans
    J. C. Goslings
    T. Schepers
    European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery, 2017, 43 : 163 - 168
  • [2] Operative versus non-operative management of rib fractures in flail chest after cardiopulmonary resuscitation manoeuvres
    Dorn, Patrick
    Pfister, Selina
    Oberhaensli, Simone
    Gioutsos, Konstantinos
    Haenggi, Matthias
    Kocher, Gregor J.
    INTERACTIVE CARDIOVASCULAR AND THORACIC SURGERY, 2022, 34 (05) : 768 - 774
  • [3] Operative Management of Rib Fractures in the Setting of Flail Chest A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Leinicke, Jennifer A.
    Elmore, Leisha
    Freeman, Bradley D.
    Colditz, Graham A.
    ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2013, 258 (06) : 914 - 921
  • [4] Operative versus non-operative management of pediatric medial epicondyle fractures: a systematic review
    Kamath, Atul F.
    Baldwin, Keith
    Horneff, John
    Hosalkar, Harish S.
    JOURNAL OF CHILDRENS ORTHOPAEDICS, 2009, 3 (05) : 345 - 357
  • [5] A Comprehensive Review of the Non-operative Management of Traumatic Rib Fractures
    Hemati, Kaveh
    Gray, Andrew T.
    Agrawal, Ashish
    CURRENT ANESTHESIOLOGY REPORTS, 2024, 14 (04) : 567 - 575
  • [6] Management of Humeral Shaft Fractures; Non-Operative Versus Operative
    Clement, Nicholas D.
    ARCHIVES OF TRAUMA RESEARCH, 2015, 4 (02)
  • [7] Operative Versus Non-Operative Management of Osteoporotic Femoral Fractures
    Lenihan, J.
    Waseem, S.
    Rawal, J.
    Hull, P.
    Carrothers, A.
    Chou, D.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2021, 108
  • [8] Management of Sport-Related Fractures: Operative Versus Non-Operative Management
    Robertson, Greg A. J.
    Aitken, Stuart A.
    Wood, Alexander M.
    TRAUMA MONTHLY, 2018, 23 (04)
  • [9] Operative versus non-operative management of blunt pancreatic trauma: A systematic review
    Soon, David S. C.
    Leang, Yit J.
    Pilgrim, Charles H. C.
    TRAUMA-ENGLAND, 2019, 21 (04): : 252 - 258
  • [10] OPERATIVE AND NON-OPERATIVE MANAGEMENT OF FRACTURES OF THE PELVIS
    HOLT, EP
    JOHNSON, WR
    BRILLANTES, S
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1959, 41 (07): : 1356 - 1356