Antihypertensive Pharmacotherapy of Patients in Primary Care with either a Statutory or Private Health Insurance

被引:0
|
作者
Laux, Gunter [1 ]
Szecsenyi, Joachim [1 ]
Miksch, Antje [1 ]
Gruen, Barbara [2 ,3 ]
Gutscher, Andreas [1 ]
Gruen, Barbara [2 ,3 ]
Rosemann, Thomas [4 ]
Kuehlein, Thomas [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Klinikum Heidelberg, Abt Allgemeinmed & Versorgungsforsch, D-69115 Heidelberg, Germany
[2] Inst Angew Qualitatsforderung, AQUA, Gottingen, Germany
[3] Univ Klinikum Heidelberg, Abt Innere Med 6, Klin Pharmakol & Pharmakoepidemiol, Heidelberg, Germany
[4] Univ Spital Zurich, Inst Hausarztmed Klin & Poliklin Innere Med, Zurich, Switzerland
关键词
Hypertension; Angiotensin II receptor blockers; Private health insurance; Primary care; ICPC; CONTENT; CONVERTING ENZYME-INHIBITORS; II RECEPTOR BLOCKERS; HYPERTENSION; ANTAGONISTS; MORBIDITY; PATTERNS;
D O I
10.1007/s00063-009-1028-4
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
In Germany, hypertension has a prevalence of about 20%. Cardiovascular morbidity and mortality are closely associated with hypertension. Therefore, antihypertensive medical treatment is of crucial importance. Currently, five groups of drugs for the medical treatment of hypertension are available: diuretics, beta-receptor blockers, calcium antagonists, angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, and angiotensin II receptor blockers. Besides medical considerations for the treatment of hypertension costs of treatment and other economic aspects become more and more important. Within this article, the antihypertensive treatment of insurants of the statutory health insurance and the private health insurance is compared with regard to the medical treatment and associated costs. The analyzed data derive from the general practice morbidity research network CONTENT (CONTinuous morbidity registration Epidemiologic NeTwork). The implementation of this network is funded by the German Federal Ministry of Research and Education (BMBF) for a continuous registration of health-care utilization, morbidity, course of disease, and outcome parameters within primary care. Altogether 4,842 patients from the participating general practitioners were regularly treated with antihypertensive drugs in 2007 and corresponding episodes were documented within electronic medical records. The proportion of insurants of the private health insurance was 7.6%. The costs of the antihypertensive medical treatment within the total sample in 2007 constituted 1.03 million Euros overall and per patient on average 212.82 Euros. Although the regarded sample of private health insurants was less morbid and the sum of defined daily doses (DDDs) within the observation period was notably lower (582.6 vs. 703.1; p < 0.0001), the annual therapy costs of the private health insurants compared to the statutory health insurants were 35.2% higher (280.29 Euros vs. 207.29 Euros; p < 0.0001). Hence, costs per DDD for antihypertensive medical treatment for private health insurants were 63.2% higher than for statutory health insurants. This refers to the great proportion of angiotensin II receptor blockers as well as the low proportion of generic drugs prescribed for private health insurants. Antihypertensive treatment with original drugs and/or angiotensin II receptor blockers is an expensive option. Based on the actual state of knowledge it must be questioned critically whether this constitutes a superior treatment option concerning the potential for lowering high blood pressure levels and organ protection.
引用
收藏
页码:108 / 113
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Antihypertensive medikamentöse Therapie von gesetzlich und privat versicherten Patienten in der PrimärversorgungAntihypertensive Pharmacotherapy of Patients in Primary Care with either a Statutory or Private Health Insurance
    Gunter Laux
    Joachim Szecsenyi
    Antje Miksch
    Barbara Grün
    Andreas Gutscher
    Barbara Grün
    Thomas Rosemann
    Thomas Kühlein
    Medizinische Klinik, 2009, 104 (2) : 108 - 113
  • [2] Lifestyle counseling in patients with hypertension in primary health care and its association with antihypertensive pharmacotherapy
    Lindblom, Sebastian
    Ivarsson, Charlotte
    Waendell, Per
    Bergqvist, Monica
    Norrman, Anders
    Eriksson, Julia
    Lund, Lena
    Hagstroemer, Maria
    Hasselstroem, Jan
    Sandlund, Christina
    Carlsson, Axel C.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL HYPERTENSION, 2024, 26 (07): : 816 - 824
  • [3] Supply of Insulins in Private Health Insurance Compared to Statutory Health Insurance
    Wild, F.
    GESUNDHEITSOEKONOMIE UND QUALITAETSMANAGEMENT, 2009, 14 (04): : 200 - 203
  • [4] Supply of New Pharmaceuticals in Private Health Insurance Compared to Statutory Health Insurance
    Wild, F.
    GESUNDHEITSOEKONOMIE UND QUALITAETSMANAGEMENT, 2008, 13 (01): : 15 - 18
  • [5] Private or statutory? How to Select the right Health Insurance
    Hempel, Ulrike
    AKTUELLE UROLOGIE, 2014, 45 (05) : 361 - 362
  • [6] Analysis of second opinion programs provided by German statutory and private health insurance - a survey of statutory and private health insurers
    Koensgen, Nadja
    Prediger, Barbara
    Bora, Ana-Mihaela
    Glatt, Angelina
    Hess, Simone
    Weissflog, Victoria
    Pieper, Dawid
    BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2021, 21 (01)
  • [7] Analysis of second opinion programs provided by German statutory and private health insurance – a survey of statutory and private health insurers
    Nadja Könsgen
    Barbara Prediger
    Ana-Mihaela Bora
    Angelina Glatt
    Simone Hess
    Victoria Weißflog
    Dawid Pieper
    BMC Health Services Research, 21
  • [8] Outpatient Care: the Perspective of the Statutory Health Insurance
    Tillmanns, Hanna
    Fuerstenberg, Torsten
    ZENTRALBLATT FUR CHIRURGIE, 2024, 149 (06): : 487 - 490
  • [9] THE PRIVATE SICKNESS FUND IN THE SYSTEM OF STATUTORY HEALTH-INSURANCE
    RICHTER, J
    ZUCKERINDUSTRIE, 1984, 109 (11): : 1038 - 1040
  • [10] Inequalities in Health Risks, Morbidity and Health Care of Children by Health Insurance of Their Parents (Statutory vs. Private Health Insurance): Results of the German KiGGS Study
    Huber, J.
    Lampert, T.
    Mielck, A.
    GESUNDHEITSWESEN, 2012, 74 (10) : 627 - 638