Improved anaerobic process efficiency using mesophilic and thermophilic elutriated phased treatment

被引:14
|
作者
Kim, M
Bae, W
Speece, RE
机构
[1] Hanyang Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Ansan 425791, Kyunggi, South Korea
[2] Vanderbilt Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Nashville, TN 37235 USA
来源
关键词
anaerobic digestion; organic loads; acids; biological treatment;
D O I
10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(2004)130:9(960)
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
An innovative anaerobic digestion elutriated phased treatment (ADEPT) has been evaluated at mesophilic (M-ADEPT) (35degreesC) and thermophilic (T-ADEPT) (55degreesC) temperatures in which the organic loading rate (OLR) was increased until reactor failure (pH<5.5). Single-stage continuously stirred tank reactors (CSTRs) at both temperatures were also operated as controls (M-CSTR for 35degreesC and T-CSTR for 55degreesC). The T-CSTR failed at an OLR of 7.4 g volatile solid (VS)/L day and the M-CSTR at an OLR of 10 g VS/L day while the M-ADEPT continued until an OLR of 18 g VS/L day and the T-ADEPT reached an OLR of 24 g VS/L day before system failure. The T-CSTR produced the poorest effluent quality as manifested by high propionate concentrations (1,500-2,500 mg/L) while both M-ADEPT and T-ADEPT produced much better quality of effluent with propionate concentrations below 100 mg/L. Thus it appears that the T-ADEPT design may solve effluent quality problems associated with normally high propionate concentrations produced during thermophilic anaerobic digestion. Superior effluent quality, reduced reactor volume requirements, more stable methanogenesis due to the extended solids retention time, and uncoupling of the methanogen wasting from the refractory sludge wasting process resulted in stable and efficient processing at both temperatures for the innovative ADEPT design. Because the higher amounts of volatile fatty acids produced in the acid elutriation phase of the ADEPT system can be a favorable carbon source for biological nutrient removal in wastewater treatment plants, this positive aspect should be considered in future applications of the ADEPT system.
引用
收藏
页码:960 / 966
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Anaerobic digestion elutriated phased treatment of piggery waste
    Ahn, YH
    Bae, JY
    Park, SM
    Min, KS
    WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2004, 49 (5-6) : 181 - 189
  • [2] Comparative process stability and efficiency of anaerobic digestion; mesophilic vs. thermophilic
    Kim, M
    Ahn, YH
    Speece, RE
    WATER RESEARCH, 2002, 36 (17) : 4369 - 4385
  • [3] Mesophilic, Thermophilic And Temperature Phased Anaerobic Digestion Of Waste Activated Sludge
    Bolzonella, David
    Fatone, Francesco
    Di Fabio, Silvia
    Cecchi, Franco
    ICHEAP-9: 9TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CHEMICAL AND PROCESS ENGINEERING, PTS 1-3, 2009, 17 : 385 - +
  • [4] Aerobic thermophilic and anaerobic mesophilic treatment of sludge
    Cheunbarn, T
    Pagilla, KR
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING-ASCE, 2000, 126 (09): : 790 - 795
  • [5] Aerobic thermophilic and anaerobic mesophilic treatment of swine waste
    Pagilla, KR
    Kim, H
    Cheunbarn, T
    WATER RESEARCH, 2000, 34 (10) : 2747 - 2753
  • [6] Pre-treatment mechanisms during thermophilic-mesophilic temperature phased anaerobic digestion of primary sludge
    Ge, Huoqing
    Jensen, Paul D.
    Batstone, Damien J.
    WATER RESEARCH, 2010, 44 (01) : 123 - 130
  • [7] Improved efficiency of anaerobic digestion through direct interspecies electron transfer at mesophilic and thermophilic temperature ranges
    Lin, Richen
    Cheng, Jun
    Ding, Lingkan
    Murphy, Jerry D.
    CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 2018, 350 : 681 - 691
  • [9] Digested Sludge Quality in Mesophilic, Thermophilic and Temperature-Phased Anaerobic Digestion Systems
    Lanko, Iryna
    Hejnic, Jakub
    Rihova-Ambrozova, Jana
    Ferrer, Ivet
    Jenicek, Pavel
    WATER, 2021, 13 (20)
  • [10] Microbial diversity in innovative mesophilic/thermophilic temperature-phased anaerobic digestion of sludge
    Gagliano, M. C.
    Braguglia, C. M.
    Gallipoli, A.
    Gianico, A.
    Rossetti, S.
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2015, 22 (10) : 7339 - 7348