Duration and recovery profile of cisatracurium after succinylcholine during propofol or isoflurane anesthesia

被引:5
|
作者
Soppitt, AJ [1 ]
Glass, PSA [1 ]
El-Moalem, H [1 ]
Ginsberg, B [1 ]
Weatherwax, K [1 ]
Gan, TJ [1 ]
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Anesthesiol, Durham, NC 27710 USA
关键词
anesthesia; isoflurane; propofol; neuromuscular blockers : cisatracurium; succinylcholine; pharmacodynamic interactions;
D O I
10.1016/S0952-8180(99)00118-X
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Study Objective: To determine the duration and recovery profile of maintenance doses of cisatracurium besylate following succinylcholine, and during propofol or isoflurane anesthesia. Design: Randomized, open-label study. Setting: Operating suite of a university-affiliated medical center. Patients: Forty ASA physical status I and II adult patients having elective surgery with general anesthesia lasting longer than 90 minutes. Interventions: Following a standardized induction sequence, a baseline electromyogram (EMG) was obtained. An intubating dose of intravenous (IV) succinylcholine 1.0 mg/kg was administered. Ventilation was maintained with a face mask until the first twitch (T-1) of the evoked train-of-four (TOF) reached 10% of control when tracheal intubation runs performed. Spontaneous recovery from neuromuscular blockade was allowed to occur until the first twitch returned to 25% of control. Patients then were randomized to receive cisatracurium as follows. Group 1: 0.025 mg/kg [0.5 X 95% effective dose (ED95)]; Group 2: 0.05 mg/kg (ED95); Group 3: 0.05 mg/kg (ED95); and Group 4: 0.1 mg/kg (2 x ED95). Anesthesia for Groups 1 and 2 were maintained with isoflurane 1% to 2%, 66% nitrous oxide (N2O) in oxygen (O-2), and in Groups 3 and 4, anesthesia was maintained with propofol 80 to 160 mu g/kg/min, 66% N2O in O-2. The TOF-evoked EMG was recorded at 10-second intervals. The time for the evoked EMG to spontaneously return to 25%, 50%, and 75% of the original baseline was recorded. Measurements and Main Results: There were 10 patients in each of the four groups. The duration of action of cisatracurium 0.05 mg/kg (ED95) after an intubating dose of succinylcholine is 24.5 +/- 10 minutes and 21.3 +/- 9 minutes during anesthesia maintained with isoflurane and propofol, respectively. Doubling the dose of cisatracurium resulted in approximately twice the duration of action (40.2 +/- 7 min) during propofol anesthesia. Following a dose of cisatracurium 0.025 mg/kg (0.5 x ED95), the T-1 of the EMG-evoked response did not decrease below 25% in 7 of 10 patients. Conclusion: Following succinylcholine, the duration of action of a single dose of cisatracurium 0.05 mg/kg is 20 to 25 minutes during anesthesia maintained with propofol or isoflurane. The duration and recovery profile of cisatracurium is dose dependent during propofol and isoflurane anesthetics. Cisatracurium 0.025 mg/kg is an inadequate maintenance dose following recovery from succinylcholine and it fails to provide adequate surgical relaxation. (C) 2000 by Elsevier Science Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:652 / 656
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Duration and recovery profile of cisatracurium after succinylcholine during propofol and isoflurane anesthesia
    Gan, TJ
    Sanderson, I
    Ginsberg, B
    Weatherwax, K
    Williams, A
    Glass, P
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1998, 86 (2S):
  • [2] Comparison of the neuromuscular blocking effects of cisatracurium during isoflurane or propofol anesthesia in dogs
    Chen, I-Ying
    Liang, Yun-Yu
    Chen, Kuan-Sheng
    Lee, Wei -Ming
    Wang, Hsien-Chi
    VETERINARY ANAESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2020, 47 (04) : 454 - 462
  • [3] Recovery profile - A comparison of isoflurane and propofol anesthesia for laparoscopic cholecystectomy
    Khalid, Asma
    Siddiqui, Safia Zafar
    Aftab, Sadqa
    Sabbar, Saleem
    Haider, Saeeda
    JCPSP-JOURNAL OF THE COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS AND SURGEONS PAKISTAN, 2008, 18 (06): : 329 - 333
  • [4] Comparison of recovery profile after ambulatory anesthesia with propofol, isoflurane, sevoflurane and desflurane: A systematic review
    Gupta, A
    Stierer, T
    Zuckerman, R
    Sakima, N
    Parker, SD
    Fleisher, LA
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2004, 98 (03): : 632 - 641
  • [5] Recovery from sevoflurane anesthesia - A comparison to isoflurane and propofol anesthesia
    Ebert, TJ
    Robinson, BJ
    Uhrich, TD
    Mackenthun, A
    Pichotta, PJ
    ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1998, 89 (06) : 1524 - 1531
  • [6] Effect of low dose isoflurane vs propofol on recovery times after long infusions of cisatracurium or rocuronium
    Jellish, WS
    Brody, M
    Gangasingh, D
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1998, 86 (2S):
  • [7] The metabolomic profile during isoflurane anesthesia differs from propofol anesthesia in the live rodent brain
    Makaryus, Rany
    Lee, Hedok
    Yu, Mei
    Zhang, Shaonan
    Smith, S. David
    Rebecchi, Mario
    Glass, Peter S.
    Benveniste, Helene
    JOURNAL OF CEREBRAL BLOOD FLOW AND METABOLISM, 2011, 31 (06): : 1432 - 1442
  • [8] RECOVERY AFTER ORAL-SURGERY WITH HALOTHANE, ENFLURANE, ISOFLURANE OR PROPOFOL ANESTHESIA
    POLLARD, BJ
    BRYAN, A
    BENNETT, D
    FARAGHER, EB
    UN, EN
    KEEGAN, M
    WILSON, A
    BURKILL, M
    BEATTY, PCW
    STOLLERY, BT
    SNOWDON, AT
    HEALY, TEJ
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1994, 72 (05) : 559 - 566
  • [9] Recovery and outcome after propofol and isoflurane anesthesia in patients undergoing laparoscopic hysterectomy
    Nelskyla, K
    Eriksson, H
    Soikkeli, A
    Korttila, K
    ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1997, 41 (03) : 360 - 363
  • [10] Antegrade amnesia after propofol and isoflurane anesthesia
    Ono, K
    Maeshima, K
    Nishimura, Y
    NEW BALANCED ANESTHESIA, 1998, 1164 : 207 - 208