Morphological assessment of the behavior of three-dimensional anionic collagen matrices in bone regeneration in rats

被引:11
|
作者
Miguel, Fulvio B.
Cardoso, Ana Karina M. V.
Barbosa, Aryon A., Jr.
Marcantonio, Elcio, Jr.
Goissis, Gilberto
Rosa, Fabiana P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Bahia, Hlth Sci Inst, Salvador, BA, Brazil
[2] Univ Fed Bahia, Fac Dent, Salvador, BA, Brazil
[3] Oswaldo Cruz Fdn, Goncalo Moniz Res Ctr, Salvador, BA, Brazil
[4] State Paulista Univ, Fac Dent, Araraquara, SP, Brazil
[5] Univ Sao Paulo, Dept Chem, Sao Paulo, Brazil
关键词
tissue bioengineering; anionic collagen; three-dimensional matrix; bone regeneration; critical size defect;
D O I
10.1002/jbm.b.30492
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
The osteogenic behavior of three-dimensional collagenic and anionic matrices (M3DGA) implanted in critical bone defects of 8 mm diameter was morphologically assessed. The defects were performed in the calvaria of 48 adult male (Wistar) rats, and observed at days 15, 30, and 60. The animals were distributed in four groups of equal number: GA1 (M3DGA with 60 min of cross-linking in glutaraldehyde [GA]); GA2 (M3DGA with 30 min of cross-linking in GA); GA3 (M3DGA with 15 min of cross-linking in GA); and G4 (control group, without any implanted biomaterial). The M3DGAs were biocompatible, with mild and regressive chronic granulomatous inflammation, associated with the degradation of their fibers. Furthermore, tissue neovascularization and neomineralization was noted, with statistically significant differences in these amounts among the groups (GA1, GA2, and GA3) and G4. In G4 neoformation was limited to the edges of the defect as well as interstitial fibrosis. Under the experimental conditions and for the parameters analyzed, the M3DGAs had osteogenic behavior, which was more evident in M3DGA 15 min. (c) 2006 Wiley Periodicals. Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:334 / 339
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Investigating endothelial invasion and sprouting behavior in three-dimensional collagen matrices
    Kayla J Bayless
    Hyeong-Il Kwak
    Shih-Chi Su
    Nature Protocols, 2009, 4 : 1888 - 1898
  • [2] Investigating endothelial invasion and sprouting behavior in three-dimensional collagen matrices
    Bayless, Kayla J.
    Kwak, Hyeong-Il
    Su, Shih-Chi
    NATURE PROTOCOLS, 2009, 4 (12) : 1888 - 1898
  • [3] Biomimetic Remineralized Three-Dimensional Collagen Bone Matrices with an Enhanced Osteostimulating Effect
    Fadeeva, Irina S.
    Teterina, Anastasia Yu.
    Minaychev, Vladislav V.
    Senotov, Anatoliy S.
    Smirnov, Igor V.
    Fadeev, Roman S.
    Smirnova, Polina V.
    Menukhov, Vladislav O.
    Lomovskaya, Yana V.
    Akatov, Vladimir S.
    Barinov, Sergey M.
    Komlev, Vladimir S.
    BIOMIMETICS, 2023, 8 (01)
  • [4] Fibroblast mechanics in three-dimensional collagen matrices
    Grinnell, Frederick
    JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES, 2008, 12 (03) : 191 - 193
  • [5] Dendritic fibroblasts in three-dimensional collagen matrices
    Grinnell, F
    Ho, CH
    Tamariz, E
    Lee, DJ
    Skuta, G
    MOLECULAR BIOLOGY OF THE CELL, 2003, 14 (02) : 384 - 395
  • [6] Fibroblast biology in three-dimensional collagen matrices
    Grinnell, F
    TRENDS IN CELL BIOLOGY, 2003, 13 (05) : 264 - 269
  • [7] Positive Effects of Three-Dimensional Collagen-Based Matrices on the Behavior of Osteoprogenitors
    Lin, Zhikai
    Nica, Cristina
    Sculean, Anton
    Asparuhova, Maria B.
    FRONTIERS IN BIOENGINEERING AND BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2021, 9
  • [8] Three-dimensional scaffold in bone regeneration
    Sordi, M. B.
    Encarnacao, I. C.
    Aragones, A.
    Benfatti, C. A. M.
    Magini, R. S.
    BIODENTAL ENGINEERING IV, 2018, : 111 - 115
  • [9] Cell Motility and Mechanics in Three-Dimensional Collagen Matrices
    Grinnell, Frederick
    Petroll, W. Matthew
    ANNUAL REVIEW OF CELL AND DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY, VOL 26, 2010, 26 : 335 - 361
  • [10] Three-dimensional bioprinting for bone tissue regeneration
    Adepu, Shivakalyani
    Dhiman, Nandini
    Laha, Anindita
    Sharma, Chandra S.
    Ramakrishna, Seeram
    Khandelwal, Mudrika
    CURRENT OPINION IN BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 2017, 2 : 22 - 28