Value capture mechanisms in publicly funded research

被引:8
|
作者
O'Kane, Conor [1 ]
Zhang, Jing A. [1 ]
Cunningham, James A. [2 ]
Dooley, Lawrence [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Otago, Otago Business Sch, Dunedin, New Zealand
[2] Northumbria Univ, Newcastle Business Sch, Newcastle Upon Tyne, Tyne & Wear, England
[3] Univ Coll Cork, Cork Univ Business Sch, Cork, Ireland
基金
爱尔兰科学基金会;
关键词
Principal investigators; Public research funding; Value capture; Science-to-business; Qualitative research; VALUE CO-CREATION; TECHNOLOGY-TRANSFER OFFICES; PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATORS; KNOWLEDGE BROKERS; QUADRUPLE HELIX; SCIENCE; COMMERCIALIZATION; INNOVATION; INDUSTRIAL; ECONOMICS;
D O I
10.1016/j.indmarman.2020.08.006
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
There is increasing pressure on academic scientists to acquire research funding and to produce impactful research that stakeholders external to the research can capture value from. However, our understanding of the mechanisms by which funded scientists do this remain unclear. We conceptualize a two stage process of value capture in publicly funded research, the first being resource exchange and knowledge exploration and the second, exploiting the funded research to expand its use. Based on this framing we ask, what are the mechanisms through which value in use is captured in publicly funded research? We draw on interviews with 41 health science principal investigators (PIs) in New Zealand along with related secondary material. Our findings identify two value capture in use mechanisms - boundary spanning and brokering - that PIs employ to extend the use of their funded research to a diverse range of ecosystem actors. While boundary spanning facilitates efficient and deep value capture with select ecosystem actors, brokering allows for wider value capture by identifying, combining and balancing multiple ecosystem interests simultaneously. Our research shows that PIs are not only at the nexus of science to business interactions, their influence surpasses industry to incorporate much broader ecosystem engagement.
引用
收藏
页码:400 / 416
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The publicness of publicly funded research
    Link, Albert N.
    Wagner, Caroline S.
    SCIENCE AND PUBLIC POLICY, 2021, 48 (05) : 757 - 762
  • [2] Using value of information analysis to inform publicly funded research priorities
    Ginnelly L.
    Claxton K.
    Sculpher M.J.
    Golder S.
    Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, 2005, 4 (1) : 37 - 46
  • [3] Directory of publicly funded research projects
    Gopalan, K.
    CURRENT SCIENCE, 2009, 96 (09): : 1163 - 1163
  • [4] The allocation of publicly funded biomedical research
    Lichtenberg, FR
    MEDICAL CARE OUTPUT AND PRODUCTIVITY, 2001, 62 : 565 - 589
  • [5] Ensuring open access for publicly funded research
    Suber, Peter
    BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2012, 345
  • [6] IS PUBLICLY FUNDED AGRICULTURAL-RESEARCH EXCESSIVE
    THIRTLE, C
    BOTTOMLEY, P
    JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 1988, 39 (01) : 99 - 111
  • [7] Assessing the societal impact of publicly funded research
    Irwin Feller
    The Journal of Technology Transfer, 2022, 47 : 632 - 650
  • [8] Assessing the societal impact of publicly funded research
    Feller, Irwin
    JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER, 2022, 47 (03): : 632 - 650
  • [9] Public value as a framework for reforming publicly funded museums
    Herguner, Burak
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PUBLIC SECTOR MANAGEMENT, 2015, 28 (06) : 461 - 474
  • [10] The balancing role of evaluation mechanisms in organizational governance-The case of publicly funded research institutions
    Luo, Junwen
    Ordonez-Matamoros, Gonzalo
    Kuhlmann, Stefan
    RESEARCH EVALUATION, 2019, 28 (04) : 344 - 354