Comparison of four different methods for Salmonella detection in fecal samples of porcine origin

被引:11
|
作者
Korsak, N [1 ]
Degeye, JN [1 ]
Etienne, G [1 ]
China, B [1 ]
Daube, G [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Liege, Fac Vet Med, Dept Food Sci, B-4000 Liege, Belgium
关键词
D O I
10.4315/0362-028X-67.10.2158
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Performances of four detection methods were evaluated for recovery of Salmonella spp. in naturally contaminated fecal specimens of porcine origin. The NMKL 71 method consisted of enrichment in Rappaport-Vassiliadis broth and plating on xylose-lysine-desoxycholate medium, whereas the SP-VG-M002 method relied on a Diasalm enrichment followed by streaking on xylose-lysine-tergitol 4 agar (XLT-4). The VIDAS SLM method was composed of double enrichment in Muller-Kauffmann tetrathionate broth and in M broths before processing in a VIDAS device. lf the results were positive, the VIDAS ICS immunoenrichment was performed and the result transferred onto three different selective media. The VIDAS ICS protocol is an immunoconcentration step followed by plating on XLT-4. Seventy-eight samples were tested with all four methods simultaneously, leading to 34 positive samples with at least one method. For this assay, VIDAS SLM revealed 31 positive samples (91.2%), whereas the average positive percentage of the three other methods was 37.3% (P < 0.001). Two-paired comparisons with the VIDAS SLM method were also performed. McNemar values were systematically highly significant (P < 0.001). The proportion of agreement was significantly inferior (P < 0.05) for the comparison of VIDAS ICS and VIDAS SLM (68.7%) compared with the two other paired comparisons (average percentage, 81.5%). The conclusion reached by this trial is that VIDAS SLM significantly improves the recovery of Salmonella in naturally contaminated fecal specimens. For the paired-comparisons, NMKL 71 and SP-VG-M002 were comparable in terms of efficiency, whereas the VIDAS ICS protocol, as established by the manufacturer for food samples only, seemed less efficient than the other two.
引用
收藏
页码:2158 / 2164
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of cultivation and PCR-hybridization for detection of Salmonella in porcine fecal and water samples
    Feder, I
    Nietfeld, JC
    Galland, J
    Yeary, T
    Sargeant, JM
    Oberst, R
    Tamplin, ML
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2001, 39 (07) : 2477 - 2484
  • [2] Comparison of conventional culture methods and two commercial enzyme immunoassays for detection of Salmonella in porcine fecal samples and cecal contents
    Wegener, HC
    Baggesen, DL
    JOURNAL OF VETERINARY DIAGNOSTIC INVESTIGATION, 1997, 9 (04) : 352 - 356
  • [3] Comparison of Culture Methods for Isolation of Salmonella in Yak Fecal Samples
    Yue, Hua
    Zhang, Bin
    Zhu, Xiaoxia
    Zhang, Huanrong
    Tang, Cheng
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGY, 2014, 54 (02) : 223 - 226
  • [4] Comparison of Culture Methods for Isolation of Salmonella in Yak Fecal Samples
    Hua Yue
    Bin Zhang
    Xiaoxia Zhu
    Huanrong Zhang
    Cheng Tang
    Indian Journal of Microbiology, 2014, 54 : 223 - 226
  • [5] Comparison of Different Methods for the Detection of Salmonella spp. in Minced Meat Samples
    Ozer, Didem
    Kimiran-Erdem, Ayten
    KAFKAS UNIVERSITESI VETERINER FAKULTESI DERGISI, 2013, 19 (05) : 801 - 806
  • [6] Comparison of four methods for the detection of fecal streptococci in water
    Heiber, I
    Frahm, E
    Obst, U
    ZENTRALBLATT FUR HYGIENE UND UMWELTMEDIZIN, 1998, 201 (4-5): : 357 - 369
  • [7] Salmonella detection in poultry samples Comparison of two commercial real-time PCR systems with culture methods for the detection of Salmonella spp. in environmental and fecal samples of poultry
    Sommer, D.
    Enderlein, D.
    Antakli, A.
    Schoenenbruecher, H.
    Slaghuis, J.
    Redmann, T.
    Lierz, M.
    TIERAERZTLICHE PRAXIS AUSGABE GROSSTIERE NUTZTIERE, 2012, 40 (06): : 383 - 389
  • [8] Comparison of four methods of HPV detection in cervical samples
    Kurtycz, Daniel F.
    Smith, Michele
    He, Rhong
    Shul, Jinna
    Miyazaki, Kayo
    Holmes, Tiffany
    Stewart, Jimmie
    CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, 2007, 111 (05): : 441 - 442
  • [9] Comparison of four sampling methods for the detection of Salmonella in broiler litter
    Buhr, R. J.
    Richardson, L. J.
    Cason, J. A.
    Cox, N. A.
    Fairchild, B. D.
    POULTRY SCIENCE, 2007, 86 (01) : 21 - 25
  • [10] Comparison of four sampling methods for the detection of Salmonella in broiler fitter
    Buhr, R. J.
    Richardson, L. J.
    Cason, J. A.
    Cox, N. A.
    POULTRY SCIENCE, 2006, 85 : 209 - 209