Oyster shell disarticulation in three Chesapeake Bay tributaries

被引:0
|
作者
Christmas, JF [1 ]
McGinty, MR [1 ]
Randle, DA [1 ]
Smith, GF [1 ]
Jordan, SJ [1 ]
机构
[1] MARYLAND DEPT NAT RESOURCES,FISHERIES RESOURCES,COOPERAT OXFORD LAB,OXFORD,MD 21654
来源
JOURNAL OF SHELLFISH RESEARCH | 1997年 / 16卷 / 01期
关键词
Crassostrea virginica; oyster mortality; box counts; shell disarticulation;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
S9 [水产、渔业];
学科分类号
0908 ;
摘要
We examined the effects of site location, season of deployment, substrate, size class, and salinity and temperature regimen on the time-since-death (TSD) required for the disarticulation of shells of Crassostrea virginica (Gmelin, 1791) at sites located in three Chesapeake Bay tributaries. The mean TSD required for disarticulation was greatest at Chestertown (815.5 days), intermediate at Oxford (718.9 days), and least at Deal Island (630.0 days), which corresponded to progressively increasing mean salinities. The mean TSD for all sites combined was 739.4 days, ranging from 21 to 1,427 days. Within sites, oyster shell size class (i.e., market-sized >76 mm, small <76 mm) had significant intrasite effects on mean TSD at Chestertown and Oxford, although among sites, a significant interaction existed between size class and sites. Overall, shell length had a strong positive correlation with TSD and accounted for 10.0% of the variability in TSD. Mean annual salinity had a strong negative correlation with TSD, accounting for 18.1% of the variability in mean TSD. The season of deployment of oyster shells had a significant effect on the mean TSD at Chestertown and Oxford. although not in a consistent manner from one site to another. However, overall, the cumulative percentage disarticulation was greatest in summer (47.6%) and least in winter (6.3%). Among sites, the substrate on which the trays were deployed (i.e., reef or sediment) did not significantly affect mean TSD.
引用
收藏
页码:115 / 123
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [2] OYSTER SHELL PRODUCTION AND LOSS IN THE CHESAPEAKE BAY
    Mann, Roger
    Southworth, Melissa
    Wesson, James
    Thomas, John
    Tarnowski, Mitchell
    Homer, Mark
    JOURNAL OF SHELLFISH RESEARCH, 2021, 40 (03): : 451 - 469
  • [3] PROSPECTING FOR FOSSIL OYSTER SHELL IN CHESAPEAKE BAY
    HOBBS, CH
    MARINE MINING, 1988, 7 (03): : 199 - 208
  • [4] Alkalinity in Tidal Tributaries of the Chesapeake Bay
    Najjar, Raymond G.
    Herrmann, Maria
    Del Valle, Sebastian M. Cintron
    Friedman, Jaclyn R.
    Friedrichs, Marjorie A. M.
    Harris, Lora A.
    Shadwick, Elizabeth H.
    Stets, Edward G.
    Woodland, Ryan J.
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-OCEANS, 2020, 125 (01)
  • [5] THE CAUSES OF ACIDIFICATION IN CHESAPEAKE BAY AND CONSEQUENCES TO OYSTER SHELL GROWTH AND DISSOLUTION
    Waldbusser, George G.
    JOURNAL OF SHELLFISH RESEARCH, 2011, 30 (02): : 559 - 560
  • [6] OYSTER DISEASES IN CHESAPEAKE BAY
    ANDREWS, JD
    MARINE FISHERIES REVIEW, 1979, 41 (1-2): : 45 - 53
  • [7] Sedimentation in floodplains of selected tributaries of the Chesapeake Bay
    Rossl, KM
    Hupp, CR
    Howard, AD
    RIPARIAN VEGETATION AND FLUVIAL GEOMORPHOLOGY, 2004, 8 : 187 - 208
  • [8] Endocrine disrupter - estradiol - in Chesapeake Bay tributaries
    Dorabawila, N
    Gupta, G
    JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS, 2005, 120 (1-3) : 67 - 71
  • [9] SEARCH FOR LINURON RESIDUES IN TRIBUTARIES OF THE CHESAPEAKE BAY
    ZAHNOW, EW
    RIGGLEMAN, JD
    JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY, 1980, 28 (05) : 974 - 978
  • [10] Operational analysis of shell planting strategies for improving the survival of oyster larvae in the Chesapeake Bay
    Wang, Q.
    Golden, B.
    Wasil, E.
    Bashyam, S.
    INFOR Journal, 1996, 34 (03):