Biosecurity - Pandemics and the aquatic environment

被引:0
|
作者
Roberts, RJ [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Idaho, Fish Culture Expt Stn, Hagerman, ID 83332 USA
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
S9 [水产、渔业];
学科分类号
0908 ;
摘要
Biosecurity, the protection of particular animals from particular areas from specific pathogens by exclusion and containment, is of great importance in relation to national and international transfer of stocks. The history of transfaunation of aquatic animals and their associated microorganisms is littered with disastrous outcomes. Occasionally, the effects are limited and localized, but from Aeromonas salmonicida in Europe in the 19th century to Aphanomyces invadans in Asia and North America in the 21st, the aquatic medium populated by wild susceptible hosts has proved itself to be a ready environment for the propagation of introduced pathogens. In order for any rational control or containment regime for infectious disease in any environment to prove effective, a number of specific conditions need to be met. In the aquatic environment, and particularly in open aquaculture operations, these are generally impossible to achieve. National control programmes may aim at preventing the introduction of specific pathogens or reducing the incidence of clinical disease. It is essential, however, if these are to have any success, that objectives are realistic, and that once a control system is seen to have been breached, they do not confuse the control of clinical outbreaks, which may be possible, with eradication of the agent once it is established. The latter may be claimed as an objective, but will be impossible if the agent and a susceptible wild host are both present in or have been released into the aquatic ecosystem within which the control measures are to be implemented.
引用
收藏
页码:5 / 11
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Aquatic biosecurity remains a damp squib
    Neil E. Coughlan
    Ross N. Cuthbert
    Jaimie T. A. Dick
    Biodiversity and Conservation, 2020, 29 : 3091 - 3093
  • [2] Aquatic biosecurity remains a damp squib
    Coughlan, Neil E.
    Cuthbert, Ross N.
    Dick, Jaimie T. A.
    BIODIVERSITY AND CONSERVATION, 2020, 29 (9-10) : 3091 - 3093
  • [3] Mercury bioremediation in aquatic environment by genetically modified bacteria with self-controlled biosecurity circuit
    Xue, Yubin
    Du, Pei
    Shendi, Amal Amin Ibrahim
    Yu, Bo
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2022, 337
  • [4] Pandemics and the global environment
    Hodges, Kip
    Jackson, Jeremy
    SCIENCE ADVANCES, 2020, 6 (28)
  • [5] Pandemics, antiviral stockpiles and biosecurity in Australia: what about the generic option?
    Lokuge, B
    Drahos, P
    Neville, W
    MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 2006, 184 (01) : 16 - 20
  • [6] <sc>Looking Left: Ecologically Based Biosecurity to Prevent Pandemics</sc>
    Reaser, Jamie K.
    Chitale, Rohit A.
    Tabor, Gary M.
    Hudson, Peter J.
    Plowright, Raina K.
    HEALTH SECURITY, 2024, 22 (01) : 74 - 81
  • [7] Pandemics, Mitigation Measures, and Environment
    Lee, Kangoh
    ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2021, 78 (02): : 353 - 374
  • [8] Evaluating Importation of Aquatic Ornamental Species for Biosecurity Purposes
    Atalah, Javier
    Davidson, Ian C.
    Thoene, Maike
    Georgiades, Eugene
    Hutson, Kate S.
    FRONTIERS IN ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2022, 9
  • [9] International and national biosecurity strategies in aquatic animal health
    Oidtmann, B. C.
    Thrush, M. A.
    Denham, K. L.
    Peeler, E. J.
    AQUACULTURE, 2011, 320 (1-2) : 22 - 33
  • [10] Perception as a tool to inform aquatic biosecurity risk assessments
    Cliff, Nicole
    Campbell, Marnie L.
    AQUATIC INVASIONS, 2012, 7 (03) : 387 - 404