Are clinical measures of foot posture and mobility associated with foot kinematics when walking?

被引:34
|
作者
Buldt, Andrew K. [1 ,2 ]
Murley, George S. [1 ,2 ]
Levinger, Pazit [3 ]
Menz, Hylton B. [2 ]
Nester, Christopher J. [4 ]
Landorf, Karl B. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] La Trobe Univ, Sch Allied Hlth, Discipline Podiatry, Melbourne, Vic 3086, Australia
[2] La Trobe Univ, Sch Allied Hlth, Lower Extrem & Gait Studies Program, Melbourne, Vic 3086, Australia
[3] Victoria Univ, Inst Sport Exercise & Act Living, Melbourne, Vic 8001, Australia
[4] Univ Salford, Sch Hlth Sci, Salford M5 4WT, Lancs, England
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
NORMATIVE VALUES; RELIABILITY; JOINT; MOTION; INDEX; SUBTALAR; GAIT; ARCH;
D O I
10.1186/s13047-015-0122-5
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: There is uncertainty as to which foot posture measures are the most valid in terms of predicting kinematics of the foot. The aim of this study was to investigate the associations of clinical measures of static foot posture and mobility with foot kinematics during barefoot walking. Method: Foot posture and mobility were measured in 97 healthy adults (46 males, 51 females; mean age 24.4 +/- 6.2 years). Foot posture was assessed using the 6-item Foot Posture Index (FPI), Arch Index (AI), Normalised Navicular Height (NNHt) and Normalised Dorsal Arch Height (DAH). Foot mobility was evaluated using the Foot Mobility Magnitude (FMM) measure. Following this, a five-segment foot model was used to measure tri-planar motion of the rearfoot, midfoot, medial forefoot, lateral forefoot and hallux. Peak and range of motion variables during load acceptance and midstance/propulsion phases of gait were extracted for all relative segment to segment motion calculations. Hierarchical regression analyses were conducted, adjusting for potential confounding variables. Results: The degree of variance in peak and range of motion kinematic variables that was independently explained by foot posture measures was as follows: FPI 5 to 22 %, NNHt 6 to 20 %, AI 7 to 13 %, DAH 6 to 8 %, and FMM 8 %. The FPI was retained as a significant predictor across the most number of kinematic variables. However, the amount of variance explained by the FPI for individual kinematic variables did not exceed other measures. Overall, static foot posture measures were more strongly associated with kinematic variables than foot mobility measures and explained more variation in peak variables compared to range of motion variables. Conclusions: Foot posture measures can explain only a small amount of variation in foot kinematics. Static foot posture measures, and in particular the FPI, were more strongly associated with foot kinematics compared with foot mobility measures. These findings suggest that foot kinematics cannot be accurately inferred from clinical observations of foot posture alone.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Are clinical measures of foot posture and mobility associated with foot kinematics when walking?
    Andrew K. Buldt
    George S. Murley
    Pazit Levinger
    Hylton B. Menz
    Christopher J. Nester
    Karl B. Landorf
    Journal of Foot and Ankle Research, 8
  • [2] The association between measures of static foot posture and foot mobility and foot kinematics during barefoot walking
    Andrew K Buldt
    George S Murley
    Pazit Levinger
    Hylton B Menz
    Christopher J Nester
    Karl B Landorf
    Journal of Foot and Ankle Research, 8 (Suppl 2)
  • [3] Effect of patellofemoral pain on foot posture and walking kinematics
    Kedroff, Louise
    Holmes, Melissa N. Galea
    Amis, Andrew
    Newham, Di J.
    GAIT & POSTURE, 2019, 70 : 361 - 369
  • [4] Relationship between static foot posture and foot mobility
    Mark W Cornwall
    Thomas G McPoil
    Journal of Foot and Ankle Research, 4
  • [5] Relationship between static foot posture and foot mobility
    Cornwall, Mark W.
    McPoil, Thomas G.
    JOURNAL OF FOOT AND ANKLE RESEARCH, 2011, 4
  • [6] Clinical measures of paediatric foot posture: a critical review
    Angela Evans
    Sheila Scutter
    Katherine Kneebone
    Journal of Foot and Ankle Research, 4 (Suppl 1)
  • [7] Clinical measures of static foot posture do not agree
    Ben Langley
    Mary Cramp
    Stewart C. Morrison
    Journal of Foot and Ankle Research, 9
  • [8] Clinical measures of static foot posture do not agree
    Langley, Ben
    Cramp, Mary
    Morrison, Stewart C.
    JOURNAL OF FOOT AND ANKLE RESEARCH, 2016, 9
  • [9] Foot posture is associated with kinematics of the foot during gait: A comparison of normal, planus and cavus feet
    Buldt, Andrew K.
    Levinger, Pazit
    Murley, George S.
    Menz, Hylton B.
    Nester, Christopher J.
    Landorf, Karl B.
    GAIT & POSTURE, 2015, 42 (01) : 42 - 48
  • [10] Investigation of the Relationships Among Clinical Measures of Foot Posture in Individuals with and Without Pronated Foot
    Kirmizi, Muge
    Cakiroglu, Mehmet Alphan
    Sengul, Yesim Salik
    Elvan, Ata
    Simsek, Ibrahim Engin
    Angin, Salih
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN PODIATRIC MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2021, 111 (06)