A framework for cumulative risk assessment in the 21st century

被引:48
|
作者
Moretto, Angelo [1 ,2 ]
Bachman, Ammie [3 ]
Boobis, Alan [4 ]
Solomon, Keith R. [5 ]
Pastoor, Timothy P. [6 ]
Wilks, Martin F. [7 ]
Embry, Michelle R. [8 ]
机构
[1] Univ Milan, Dipartimento Sci Biomed & Clin, Milan, Italy
[2] Univ Milan, Luigi Sacco Hosp, ASST Fatebenefratelli Sacco, Int Ctr Pesticides & Hlth Risks Prevent ICPS, Milan, Italy
[3] ExxonMobil Biomed Sci Inc, Annandale, NJ USA
[4] Imperial Coll London, London, England
[5] Univ Guelph, Sch Environm Sci, Ctr Toxicol, Guelph, ON, Canada
[6] Syngenta Crop Protect, Greensboro, NC USA
[7] Univ Basel, Swiss Ctr Appl Human Toxicol, Basel, Switzerland
[8] ILSI Hlth & Environm Sci Inst, Washington, DC 20005 USA
关键词
Chemical stressors; cumulative risk assessment; non-chemical stressors; RISK21; risk assessment; EXPOSURE; ROADMAP;
D O I
10.1080/10408444.2016.1211618
中图分类号
R99 [毒物学(毒理学)];
学科分类号
100405 ;
摘要
The ILSI Health and Environmental Sciences Institute (HESI) has developed a framework to support a transition in the way in which information for chemical risk assessment is obtained and used (RISK21). The approach is based on detailed problem formulation, where exposure drives the data acquisition process in order to enable informed decision-making on human health safety as soon as sufficient evidence is available. Information is evaluated in a transparent and consistent way with the aim of optimizing available resources. In the context of risk assessment, cumulative risk assessment (CRA) poses additional problems and questions that can be addressed using the RISK21 approach. The focus in CRA to date has generally been on chemicals that have common mechanisms of action. Recently, concern has also been expressed about chemicals acting on multiple pathways that lead to a common health outcome, and non-chemical other conditions (non-chemical stressors) that can lead to or modify a common outcome. Acknowledging that CRAs, as described above, are more conceptually, methodologically and computationally complex than traditional single-stressor risk assessments, RISK21 further developed the framework for implementation of workable processes and procedures for conducting assessments of combined effects from exposure to multiple chemicals and non-chemical stressors. As part of the problem formulation process, this evidence-based framework allows the identification of the circumstances in which it is appropriate to conduct a CRA for a group of compounds. A tiered approach is then proposed, where additional chemical stressors and/or non-chemical modulating factors (ModFs) are considered sequentially. Criteria are provided to facilitate the decision on whether or not to include ModFs in the formal quantitative assessment, with the intention to help focus the use of available resources to have the greatest potential to protect public health.
引用
收藏
页码:85 / 97
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Risk assessment needs 21st century rationality as well as 21st century science
    Boobis, A.
    TOXICOLOGY LETTERS, 2011, 205 : S1 - S1
  • [2] Cardiovascular Risk Assessment in the 21st Century
    Gaziano, J. Michael
    Wilson, Peter W. F.
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2012, 308 (08): : 816 - 817
  • [3] Risk assessment in the 21st century: Roadmap and matrix
    Embry, Michelle R.
    Bachman, Ammie N.
    Bell, David R.
    Boobis, Alan R.
    Cohen, Samuel M.
    Dellarco, Michael
    Dewhurst, Ian C.
    Doerrer, Nancy G.
    Hines, Ronald N.
    Moretto, Angelo
    Pastoor, Timothy P.
    Phillips, Richard D.
    Rowlands, J. Craig
    Tanir, Jennifer Y.
    Wolf, Douglas C.
    Doe, John E.
    CRITICAL REVIEWS IN TOXICOLOGY, 2014, 44 : 6 - 16
  • [4] A 21st century update on neurotoxicity risk assessment
    Boyes, W. K.
    TOXICOLOGY LETTERS, 2016, 259 : S51 - S52
  • [5] The concept of risk assessment evaluations in the 21st century
    Tsatsakis, A.
    TOXICOLOGY LETTERS, 2024, 399 : S47 - S47
  • [6] Risk assessment in the 21st century: where are we heading?
    Brescia, Susy
    Alexander-White, Camilla
    Li, Hequn
    Cayley, Alex
    TOXICOLOGY RESEARCH, 2023, 12 (01) : 1 - 11
  • [7] A 21st century roadmap for human health risk assessment
    Pastoor, Timothy P.
    Bachman, Ammie N.
    Bell, David R.
    Cohen, Samuel M.
    Dellarco, Michael
    Dewhurst, Ian C.
    Doe, John E.
    Doerrer, Nancy G.
    Embry, Michelle R.
    Hines, Ronald N.
    Moretto, Angelo
    Phillips, Richard D.
    Rowlands, J. Craig
    Tanir, Jennifer Y.
    Wolf, Douglas C.
    Boobis, Alan R.
    CRITICAL REVIEWS IN TOXICOLOGY, 2014, 44 : 1 - 5
  • [8] Can Cardiovascular Risk Assessment Be Improved in the 21st Century?
    Gaziano, Thomas A.
    Gaziano, J. Michael
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2024, 331 (22): : 1891 - 1893
  • [9] PSYCHOANALYTIC THEORY AS A UNIFYING FRAMEWORK FOR 21ST CENTURY PERSONALITY ASSESSMENT
    Bornstein, Robert F.
    PSYCHOANALYTIC PSYCHOLOGY, 2010, 27 (02) : 133 - 152
  • [10] Prelude: Assessment for the 21st Century
    Shute, Valerie J.
    Becker, Betsy Jane
    INNOVATIVE ASSESSMENT FOR THE 21ST CENTURY: SUPPORTING EDUCATIONAL NEEDS, 2010, : 1 - 11