On the optimal progressivity of the income tax code

被引:121
作者
Conesa, Juan Carlos
Krueger, Dirk
机构
[1] Univ Frankfurt, Dept Econ & Business, D-60054 Frankfurt, Germany
[2] Univ Autonoma Barcelona, E-08193 Barcelona, Spain
[3] Univ Penn, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[4] CEPR, London, England
[5] NBER, Gaithersburg, MD USA
关键词
progressive taxation; optimal taxation; flat taxes; social insurance; transition;
D O I
10.1016/j.jmoneco.2005.03.016
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
This paper computes the optimal progressivity of the income tax code in a dynamic general equilibrium model with household heterogeneity in which uninsurable labor productivity risk gives rise to a nontrivial income and wealth distribution. A progressive tax system serves as a partial substitute for missing insurance markets and enhances an equal distribution of economic welfare. These beneficial effects of a progressive tax system have to be traded off against the efficiency loss arising from distorting endogenous labor supply and capital accumulation decisions. Using a utilitarian steady state social welfare criterion we find that the optimal US income tax is well approximated by a flat tax rate of 17.2% and a fixed deduction of about $9,400. The steady state welfare gains from a fundamental tax reform towards this tax system are equivalent to 1.7% higher consumption in each state of the world. An explicit computation of the transition path induced by a reform of the current towards the optimal tax system indicates that a majority of the population currently alive (roughly 62%) would experience welfare gains, suggesting that such fundamental income tax reform is not only desirable, but may also be politically feasible. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1425 / 1450
页数:26
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]  
Aiyagari R., 1994, Q J ECON, V59, P659
[3]   The optimum quantity of debt [J].
Aiyagari, SR ;
McGrattan, ER .
JOURNAL OF MONETARY ECONOMICS, 1998, 42 (03) :447-469
[4]  
ALBANESI S, 2003, 190 FED RES BANK MIN
[5]   Tax and education policy in a heterogeneous-agent economy:: What levels of redistribution maximize growth and efficiency? [J].
Bénabou, R .
ECONOMETRICA, 2002, 70 (02) :481-517
[6]   EQUAL SACRIFICE AND INCENTIVE COMPATIBLE INCOME TAXATION [J].
BERLIANT, M ;
GOUVEIA, M .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS, 1993, 51 (02) :219-240
[7]   Accounting for the US earnings and wealth inequality [J].
Castañeda, A ;
Díaz-Giménez, J ;
Ríos-Rull, JV .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 2003, 111 (04) :818-857
[8]  
CASTANEDA A, 1999, UNPUB EARNINGS WEALT
[9]   Growth and welfare analysis of tax progressivity in a heterogeneous-agent model [J].
Caucutt, EM ;
Imrohoroglu, S ;
Kumar, KB .
REVIEW OF ECONOMIC DYNAMICS, 2003, 6 (03) :546-577
[10]   OPTIMAL TAXATION OF CAPITAL INCOME IN GENERAL EQUILIBRIUM WITH INFINITE LIVES [J].
CHAMLEY, C .
ECONOMETRICA, 1986, 54 (03) :607-622